Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
0 members (),
139
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,113 Posts1,056,619 Members48,450 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#39407 02/12/2002 5:40 AM | Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 45 Member | | Member Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 45 | Hi, I recently acquired this intake manifold and am just curious what it is. I was told it was used on the 216/235/261 6 cylinders when they were converted to propane for more power, but the ports look a bit too big. Could it possibly be for a GMC or something like that? I have absolutely no clue. It was made by the Johnson Machine Company. Thank you. http://chuddy117.homestead.com/propane.html Chad
1955 Chevrolet 210 2 door Sedan a 30,000 mile UNMOLESTED original, now my daily driver! Original 6 cylinder with a rebuilt '66-'69 Saginaw 3-speed Overdrive. Synchro low! Otherwise, everything original down to the spare tire. Interior is like new. Needs paint, but absolutely zero rust.
| | |
#39408 02/12/2002 8:22 AM | Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 523 Member | | Member Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 523 | Two things ..... measure the manifold end to end the GMC is longer When I went to you link I got two pop-ups on the desktop DON'T DO THAT!! | | |
#39409 02/12/2002 8:34 AM | Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 1,897 Member | | Member Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 1,897 | It is NOT for a pre-63 GM 6-cylinder.If it fits GM, it will be 63 and up when they made the 194-230-250 and 292.I would almost guess it to be a marine manifold,,,,,or off an engine from a generator (large type). Are you positive it is GM ??
There is enough good in the worst of us and enough bad in the best of us that it does not behoove any of us to criticize the rest of us. - - Be yourself. If you are ever lost, It will be much easier to find yourself if you know who you are!
| | |
#39410 02/12/2002 10:48 AM | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 587 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 587 | Sure spaced out there! I was thinking marine too as you said Johnson Machine in your post and I was thinking of Johnson outboards. ports don't look right for GM.
G.L. Grumpy's Old Iron Ranch Huntington, IN 46750
MM R tractor, Speedex and Power King tractors
| | |
#39411 02/12/2002 3:27 PM | Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 962 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 962 | I'm gonna guess and say a 1 bbl manifold for a big F*** six.
chip
Preaching the Hot Rod Gospel according to the 4-stroke apostles:
Suck, Squish, Fire and Fumes
| | |
#39412 02/12/2002 6:23 PM | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 72 Member | | Member Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 72 | Nope not for a big F**d. They had individual intake ports. Dennis | | |
#39413 02/12/2002 9:16 PM | Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 962 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 962 | Whoops... Knew the **** fuelies had individual ports, wasn't sure about the carb version. So what is it?
Are the ports too big for a 250? Was GM the only company that didn't have bolt holes in their intakes? Any kinda engine come stock in that green color? Why could it be a propane intake?
chip
Preaching the Hot Rod Gospel according to the 4-stroke apostles:
Suck, Squish, Fire and Fumes
| | |
#39415 02/12/2002 10:56 PM | Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 1,897 Member | | Member Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 1,897 | Tony,,,,, go see the optometrist!!!!
It does have the same bolt-holes! On the mounting flange to the head anyway.the exhuast manifold to the bottom of the intake has some difference though!
There is enough good in the worst of us and enough bad in the best of us that it does not behoove any of us to criticize the rest of us. - - Be yourself. If you are ever lost, It will be much easier to find yourself if you know who you are!
| | |
#39416 02/12/2002 11:10 PM | Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 1,586 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 1,586 | Ok Mechainac, I found my reading glasses.At least I can see it ain't a GMC,FoMoCo,Mopar,AMC,or Honda LOL | | |
#39417 02/12/2002 11:19 PM | Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 1,897 Member | | Member Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 1,897 | The lack of exhaust manifold attached to the bottom of the intake makes me think it is for a marine application.It certainly looks like a GM 230/250/292! BTW,,,, glad you found your glasses.I was getting a little worried! 
There is enough good in the worst of us and enough bad in the best of us that it does not behoove any of us to criticize the rest of us. - - Be yourself. If you are ever lost, It will be much easier to find yourself if you know who you are!
| | |
#39418 02/13/2002 12:35 AM | Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 45 Member | | Member Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 45 | Hey, thanks for all the posts guys. Why would this company go to all the trouble of producing an intake that is almost identical to the stock manifold? Is this worth anything or is it a boat anchor? I'm thinking of just throwing it on ebay or something. Thank you.
Chad
1955 Chevrolet 210 2 door Sedan a 30,000 mile UNMOLESTED original, now my daily driver! Original 6 cylinder with a rebuilt '66-'69 Saginaw 3-speed Overdrive. Synchro low! Otherwise, everything original down to the spare tire. Interior is like new. Needs paint, but absolutely zero rust.
| | |
#39419 02/13/2002 6:48 PM | Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 198 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 198 | That looks an awful lot like my '63 230 intake, especially the drilled 'hump' on the left for the throttle linkage. However the carb mount isn't as built up as it us on mine. [img]http://www.msnusers.com/acpngi6ubdjpoiv6d045kfo3g6/Documents/Pictures%2F230intake2.jpg[/img]
Attitude - The difference between an adventure and an ordeal! Deja Moo - The feeling you've heard this bull**** before! '63 Chev Fleetside Longbox 'Rusto-rod' 'Big Red' '69 or'70 or ? Mantaray DuneBuggy
| | |
#39420 02/13/2002 11:22 PM | Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 | It probably isn't a propane manifold. Propane engines absolutely require heated manifolds to keep from icing up since propane is compressed to a liquid when stored and when it comes out it cools off by about 50 degrees (kinda like nitrous). It would ice up the manifold on a street engine. The regulators and carbs have to be water heated.
Paint & Body Shop moderator A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic. | | |
#39421 02/14/2002 5:30 AM | Joined: Jan 1970 Posts: 365 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 1970 Posts: 365 | The only heat required in a propane fuel system is in the regulator/convertor. Liquid propane, like LIQUID gasoline will not burn. Propane at normal temperatures is a gas. I cannot remember the temperature that propane becomes a liquid, but it is pretty cold (like -50 or so???)
Anyway, when propane as a liquid becomes a gas, it evaporates which has a cooling effect, hence the need for heat in the convertor/regulator to keep it from icing up. The propane in the tank will not evaporate fast enough on its own to run an engine under full power, so hot water basically boils the liquid propane, so the engine will have enough vapor to run on. Once the propane is a vapor, it has to be pressurized (250-300 psi) or supercooled to become a liquid again. That is where propane has an atvantage over gas. In normal operation conditions, propane is a vapor and will stay suspended in the intake manifold to be burned by the engine. It is a much cleaner fuel to handle and burn because it does not have all the additives and contaminants that gasoline has. It does NOT have the BTU energy that gasoline has, so it will not produce as much power.
I remember some guy around Wichita KS about 25 years ago that built a heat exchanger that vaporized gasoline which he then ran in a propane carburetor. They were interviewing him on TV and the reporter asked him if his pickup (a 66 Chevy pickup) showed any difference in power or economy with this invention. He said he was getting 60 mpg pretty regular. The reporter asked about power again, and the guy got this sly grin on his face. He jumped in the quietly idling pickup and smoked BOTH tires (posi) all the way down the block and most of the way down the next block before he backed out of it. The smoke cleared just enought for the reporter to surmise that power was not a problem and the story ended. | | |
#39422 02/14/2002 6:25 AM | Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 45 Member | | Member Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 45 | Thanks for the info on the propane! Thats interesting.....so do you think this is a propane manifold or just a marine manifold? I suppose it could be used for either purpose. I'm just wondering what to write when i throw it on Ebay. Thanks!
Chad
1955 Chevrolet 210 2 door Sedan a 30,000 mile UNMOLESTED original, now my daily driver! Original 6 cylinder with a rebuilt '66-'69 Saginaw 3-speed Overdrive. Synchro low! Otherwise, everything original down to the spare tire. Interior is like new. Needs paint, but absolutely zero rust.
| | |
| |