The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
8 members (MickeyP, Gdads51, Ridgeback, 55shaker, Gray_Ghost, 32Fordpuchoptop, Charles in CA, elhippie64), 114 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,118
Posts1,056,302
Members48,439
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#38603 07/22/2003 2:26 AM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 26
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 26
I have a '55 4400 truck with a 235 engine. The engine is shot. I have another '56 235 engine in a '37 Chevy 1.5 ton truck made into a tractor. It runs, and I am swaping that engine into the '55. I pulled the head on the engine to give the head the once over before it goes into the truck. I checked the cylinders for roundness, and have come up with a average number of 3.567" bore. My Motors manual says the bore of the 235 is 3.452". Is this a misprint??? I am reading the mics right, and my tools are not inaccurate, at least that much. Could the 235 be bored out 0.100"? The cylinders are round, the pistons fit well, and bores are smooth.

Any thoughts on this???


1942 Chevy G7104 1.5 ton 4x4
1946 Willys CJ-2A
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Blue - my manual says a stock bore is 3-9/16 inches which is 3.5625" Sounds like the bore is fine.

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,897
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,897
Also the top of the pistons should have the oversize stamped into them if they are oversize.
0.10 , 0.20, 0.30 and so on.


There is enough good in the worst of us and enough bad in the best of us that it does not behoove any of us to criticize the rest of us.
-
-
Be yourself. If you are ever lost, It will be much easier to find yourself if you know who you are!
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 26
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 26
Ok, my book must have a misprint in it. I cleaned off the pistons and looked for the stampings of oversize, but did not find any. Ken, your numbers make sense, as I have about a .005 - .006 ridge on the top of the bore where the rings dont hit. Is the wear on this engine (.005-.008) acceptable?


1942 Chevy G7104 1.5 ton 4x4
1946 Willys CJ-2A
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
4
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
4 Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
That might be acceptable as long as the ring gap and ring lands are and the cylinder taper isn't too bad, but you might want to have it bored 0.10 over if your ring or piston gap is out of spec. Don't bother getting the pistons knurled, that won't last.


Paint & Body Shop moderator
A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0