Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,046 Posts1,055,618 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#38208 03/30/2004 9:02 PM | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 13 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 13 | Truely how bad are the 216 motors? I have one in a 1950 Suburban and I'm trying to decide if it is worth rebuilding or going with a small block 350.... Any info will help.......
Anthony McCants
1950 Chevy Suburban
| | |
#38209 03/30/2004 9:12 PM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | Are those the only two options?
If you like the original look, a later 235 with pressure oil would be easier than a 350 and look more like it grew there.
The later sixes can be swapped in with less work than doing a 350 too. Steering column issues go away with the sixes.
How are you going to use the truck? What kind of transmission do you want to use.
If you aren't committed to keeping an original driveline you have many options, and at that point the first decision is how you want to use the truck once you've done all that work.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
#38210 03/30/2004 9:27 PM | Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 1,096 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 1,096 | [Truely how bad are the 216 motors?] Bad question to ask someone who uses the original 216 as a daily driver Nothing wrong with them at all ,, if driven within their normal operating capabilities . I have been running my old truck , and the '39 before it since 1974. Sure they leak oil , and are not over endowered with power . But that and other quirks is part of the character of old trucks. If you want a rig to cruise the freeway at 70mph , then you need a newer truck , or a hotrod . Sort out what you expect to do with the truck , then decide what will work.  | | |
#38211 03/30/2004 9:55 PM | | Anonymous Unregistered | | Anonymous Unregistered | I had a hot 327 in a 53 burb, and it was a lot of fun. Had about 325 horses, 373 posi, and a close ratio 3 speed. I could fly down the street with both back tires smokin, the nose in the air, and the q-jet howling like a banshee. When people see something that big squat down and start makin' all that racket, trust me, they perk right up and pay attention! However, if I had it to do over I would use a warmed up 261 and keep the vintage look. | | |
#38212 03/30/2004 11:30 PM | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | The 216 is a good motor, but it wasn't made for hotrodding. If you want to pump up an inline six, a later full pressure model is a better choice. If you look at the 216, you see a motor that looks very similar to the later 235. It evolved from the old design. Although Chev was behind the times with the oiling system, they designed improvements that gave it a good reputation and powered many trucks. | | |
#38213 03/31/2004 1:41 AM | Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 165 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 165 | Dusty, I agree!!! there is nothing bad about the 216 motor, they are a good unit. | | |
#38214 04/01/2004 2:57 PM | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 13 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 13 | Is the inline 235 the largest inline 6 you can install without major issues?
Anthony McCants
1950 Chevy Suburban
| | |
#38215 04/01/2004 3:04 PM | Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 1,966 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 1,966 | 261 is no harder to install than a 235. A few here have done it. Do a search for 261 on this forum. Lots of good info.
Professional Novice
| | |
#38216 04/01/2004 3:06 PM | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 985 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 985 | Wally just got done installing a 261.
Brian Moore 1949 3100 5 window Deluxe "Today is better than yesterday, but not as good as tomorrow" | | |
#38217 04/01/2004 4:41 PM | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 1,745 Member | | Member Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 1,745 | That is like going to a British bike website and asking if they are any good. 4 out of 5 stovebolters still use their stovebolts. The 5th, well, black sheep I guess. Try to find a 261. Once you go V8 you better upgrade the whole thing, brakes everthing. Or buy a newer truck that already has those things. Make sure your 216 is no good first as they run forever.
54 3100 with 235 62 flatbed dump C60 with 261
| | |
#38218 04/01/2004 6:57 PM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 62 Member | | Member Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 62 | 89cutlass, I replaced a 216 in a 40' half ton with a 261. I put a small Holley 4bb on it(for gas mileage) and ran into a minor carb to gas peddle linkage problem. Patrick's has what I needed to solve the fan clearance problem. Those were only problems I had. I kept the truck stock in that I can put the old 216 back in with a wrench. The 261 has modern oiling and runs like a raped ape. You might consider one. Patricks and Cliffords and my machinist and this site helped me tonnes as I'm NO expert. | | |
| |