|
BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| |
7 members (cmayna, festerhairball, Peggy M, Ponchogl, homer52, Leo, Gdads51),
528
guests, and
1
robot. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums66 Topics126,777 Posts1,039,264 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 21 Apprentice | Apprentice Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 21 | Well thanks to a couple of fellows in the big bolt section that have answered 2 of my questions and one I did not ask they now have given me the need to ask a couple more here in this site the help here is great anyway to the questions. It seems I am the proud owner of a 1953 3 ton truck with a 248 engine. The odometer reads 18000 miles truck has not been used since the mid 70s. Now my questions 1 can it be run on unleaded fuel without the use of lead substitute or will it need to be rebuilt with the hardened valve rods. 2 will it maintain 50-55 miles per hour speed limit as if I dont have to change the drive train I would like to keep it as close to original as possible and I plan on driveing it daily. I believe that trucks of this period have class and deserve to keep working heck its only a year older than I am and I still work. Thanks for your help. | | | | Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 49 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 49 | Interesting question about the fuel. I have a 1972 Toyota Landcruiser, with the original 6 cylinder. It was designed to run on regular gas. I do not remember when unleaded fuel started being made, but it must have been about this time. The reason I say this, is because in my owner's manual, Toyota includes a note that says that if unleaded fuel is used, it must be 91+ octane. I don't know if that statement is true or not. I have owned the Landcruiser for 12 years. I have always put 91+ octane in it and have had no problems with the engine. It uses no oil and runs like a top. From time to time, I will run it at 65-70 mph. At 70 mph, the engine is really screaming, since the transmission is a 3 speed. I think the rear end is a 3.7. But, I'm not sure. | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,112 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,112 | Congratulations on your new aquisition.
As for the fuel question, doing a search will yield mixed opinions. My advive is to drive it the way it is and if it needs a teardown at some point, talk it over with your machinist.
Your truck will probably cruise at less than 50 mph. I would think that 45 mph would be cranking it pretty good. There are many on this site that can tell you from experience. | | | | Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 49 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 49 | Well, once again, I have shown my ignorance on the mechanics of the vehicles I own. I stated earlier that I thought my Landcruiser had 3.7 gears. WRONG! They are 4.11. Wanted to correct myself, before someone else corrected me. Not that there are a lot of 'Bolters out there that have '72 Landcruisers. But, you never know.
However, this thread was about fuel, and my statement still stands. | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 21 Apprentice | Apprentice Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 21 | Thanks guys that answers a lot of ?s for me it was suggested over on the big bolt forum that the engine is a 248 GMC but I will add the engine serial # here as I should have done in the first place engine serial # is g42224. I have a axle that is currently in a 1991 school bus its an International with disk brakes but as the I already own the bus and have the elictic brake system and the rims and matching front axle I can update the brakes and rims and rear end all at the same time. The bus was a deisel with a automatic transmission will the engine and tranny in the 53 work with enough power to get her up to speed. | | |
| |
|