Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (55shaker, MickeyP, Ranger, KCMongo, Otto Skorzeny, Wally / Montana, Gdads51),
94
guests, and
0
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,051 Posts1,055,706 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#30030 07/07/2003 3:59 AM | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 587 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 587 | Doing my first stovebolt engine, only 2nd engine ever. 261 six. Everything looks real clean on this engine, which I had running on stand recently. I wasn't gonna tear-down, but changed mind as going in COE and hard to get out if bad or problems again. One valve spring (intake) was broken, but valve still worked until you touched the spring. All the valves look good from first look. All are oiling good. On head bolts, I didn't see any special looking bolt for oil passageway to valve train! Is there one on 261? No little tube in side cover either. There was hardly a ridge on any cylinder and all pistons came right out w/out cutting it. Rings and pistons looked fairly new and nice. Rod and main bearings all smooth and uncolored, look new. Even the rear main seal, which was a rubber unit with a metal core looked good. Is this a replacement fot the rope one or did they have rubber on 261? So, now off to shop to get checked and cleaned and measured. I'm pretty sure I'm not gonna bore, think this is low mileage engine or recent rebuild. Even the cam looks fine to me, I'll ask the shop. I can hear the money drain already! Kaching! 
G.L. Grumpy's Old Iron Ranch Huntington, IN 46750
MM R tractor, Speedex and Power King tractors
| | |
#30031 07/07/2003 4:07 AM | Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 523 Member | | Member Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 523 | If the piston rings don't cut your fingers and the rings don't move up and down in the ring lands I be you don't have to bore it.
Look at the back of the bearings and their contact with the caps....if that looks even and not spotted Runn'em
Clean-new rings-assembly lube-torque-run
Hey it could happen | | |
#30032 07/07/2003 4:18 AM | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | If you feel the top of the cylinder wall just under the ridge, you will detect the worst part of the taper. If it is a recent rebuild that is not rebored, the taper will be there with little or no ridge. | | |
#30033 07/07/2003 6:21 PM | Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 | I just got my '62 261 fired up in my '50 this weekend after waiting for a new radiator. It really has a lot more power than the old 216. The later blocks have the neoprene main seals from the factory and oil through a passage from head to block, and don't need the oil line in the lifter gallery. If your block is in that nice of shape I agree with Proffit, get new rings, get the head done up right, and run it. Use new springs on all the valves, get the seats ground, and put in new valve guide seals. Paint it green!
Paint & Body Shop moderator A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic. | | |
#30034 07/07/2003 6:40 PM | Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 | I would recommend installing the umbrella style valve seals, if they're not already there. Also, do the exhaust valves have hardened seats? And, yes, all new springs and keepers.
Fred 52 3600 69 C-10
| | |
| |