The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (klhansen, Peggy M, Wayne67vert, Otto Skorzeny, gswbbc, J Lucas), 124 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,042
Posts1,055,497
Members48,424
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#25192 08/27/2003 4:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 175
R
Member
Member
R Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 175
working on new brakes for a 49 1/2 ton. As I read the shop manual it seems to indicate that all brake lines were 1/4 in dia tubing. I ordered a preformed set from Jim Carter and the tube that would connect the rear cylinders is a smaller dia than the rest of the lines. Is this correct? Does it make a difference in braking efficiency? Any body jump in that has a thought. Thanks.

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 198
F
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
F Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 198
If I remember correctly it was an early and simple attempt at brake equalization. Smaller line moves smaller amount of fluid, less braking at the rear than at the front.
Someone here will probably confirm or deny this theory. smile


Attitude - The difference between an adventure and an ordeal!
Deja Moo - The feeling you've heard this bull**** before!
'63 Chev Fleetside Longbox 'Rusto-rod' 'Big Red'
'69 or'70 or ? Mantaray DuneBuggy
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 224
M
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
M Offline
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 224
sounds good to me.

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 504
5
Member
Member
5 Offline
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 504
The lines that connect to 1/2 ton wheel cylinders are 3/16. As for the carrying lines from the master to the blocks , I think they are 1/4 inch..


Bill M
53 GMC Hydra-Matic

Home Page
http://home.comcast.net/~bd97/index.html

When you argue with a fool, two fools are arguing..
#25196 08/27/2003 10:36 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 140
G
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
G Offline
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 140
In any hydraulic system, pressure is equal throughout the system, regardless of line size.

So when you step on the brake, fluid is gonna move through tubes and push the shoes out. Until the shoes hit the drums, there's not much resistance and the pressure is low.

Once the shoes meet resistance, pressure goes up rapidly and remains equal throughout the system.

A smaller tube would introduce a *very* slight pressure drop during the initial take-up show movement, but that wouldn't matter since the shoes aren't touching yet.

Once the shoes touch, the amount of actual fluid flow is small, and so the very small pressure drop through the tube is not significant comapred to the severla hundred PSI operating pressure.

I'd use whatever tubes, etc fit the fittings.

Cheers!
George

#25197 08/27/2003 11:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 428
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 428
If I remember right,when I redid my 50 with the Huck brakes all the lines were 1/4". On my 51 with the Bendix brakes the line from the master to the frame block was 1/4". All other lines to wheel cylinders were 3/16".

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 175
R
Member
Member
R Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 175
Thanks for the input. I talked to Bob Adler about this and he indicated that the 3/16 connectors would not even fit in the brass junction blocks in the wheel cylinders if they were original 49s. I checked this out and he is correct. All lines on the 49 1/2 ton were 1/4 inch. Jim Carter is exchanging the 3/16 that they sent for 1/4".

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 197
R
Member
Member
R Offline
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 197
You can get adapters from your local parts house to fix this.


Jason

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0