Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,078 Posts1,056,024 Members48,433 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 67 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 67 | hi i have a 54 3100 with a 235 and a late model 4 speed manual (originally 3 on the tree) the car has been converted to 12v with a alternator. i would like to switch to a modern key or push-button starter instead of the floor starter. nothing wrong with the original starter but one i dont trust it (looks original) and two i would like to take this truck on long trips and want something new and reliable and which could be easily had at any parts store in case something happens. Are there any starters from any other year cars or trucks which would just bolt up, and how do i go about making it turn key or push-button? thanks allot!!!! | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | There's not really much in the line of choices, one thing you'll need to know is what flywheel you have. If the 12 volt conversion used the original 6 volt starter (not uncommon) then you will have the early "wide tooth" flywheel, the later flywheels have a different tooth patter/count and while interchangeable, only work with they're respective starters. So, what you'll need is either a starter from a passenger car 6 or Hydro-Matic equipped truck. These are the only ones that will bolt up to you're bellhousing, but they will convert it to a key switch start. Oh, and you'll need an ignition switch from a key start vehicle, too. One question, are there any other reasons you want to do away with the foot starter other than the reasons you list? Those starter are really easy to overhaul, and are more reliable that what they put on cars these days (I know, I replace alot of them, including 4 on my own late model Blazer). i everhauled the one in my '55 for about $12 (parts and electrical cleaner), and it starts up every time.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 67 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 67 | well one problem i have with it is it grinds sometimes when i push in the foot pedal. and i really dont like the whole foot starter thing, and figured something newer would be more reliable. so would a rebuild of this original unit be better? could i convert this original unit to push or key start with a different selenoid? | | | | | Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 581 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 581 | Sound's like the ring gear on the flywheel is worn. The engine tends to stop in the same place when it's turned off and this area of the ring gear gets chewed up over time by the stronger metal of the starter gear. If this is the case, you will still have the problem after swapping out starters. The ring gear is a press fit and it can be taken off the flywheel with heat. You can flip it and reposition it so that "fresh teeth" will engage the starter gear or you can replace it with a new ring gear.
One of the nice things about the foot starter is that few of today's car thieves know how to start the truck. | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | There's no solenoid on the original foot starters, just the linkage from the pedal. As for the grinding, Laroke's on the right track, most likely the ring gear. You can chnage over to a solenoid type starter, but you will have to use one from a '54 or earlier passenger car or a '54 Hydro-matic truck, unless you change the flywheel to the '55-'62, then you could use starters up to '62 from passenger, truck Hydro-matic '55-59, or any truck '60-'62. I do beleive that napa has reman units, not sure about actual "new" starters though.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 67 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 67 | well this 235 seems to have a solenoid equipped starter: Picture | | | | | Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 1,299 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 1,299 | hydramatics had a solenoid start but they will be tough to find. | | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 769 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 769 | Any more pics of the roadster? I saw a great 27 T roadster at last years Route 66 in San Bernardino. It had a 235 in it, very cool.
BTW, the starter on the roadster is from a later model 235. My 54 hydro has exposed solenoid linkage. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | As Lonnie stated above the 1954 Chevrolet truck's Hydra-Matic's solenoid-equipped starter (it has a push button actuator on the dash) has an external engagement linkage . Does anyone know if the engagement teeth on the Hydra-Matic starter are the same as on a regular 6v truck starter? Tim | | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | Your choices of solenoid starters are:
1949-54 passenger if you have a 6 volt flywheel 1955-63 passenger with 6 cylinder, 12 volt flywheel 1960-62 truck with 6 cylinder, 12 volt flywheel.
The foot starter is in my opinion one of the most reliable starters.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,029 Member | | Member Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,029 | Also bear in mind that six volt solenoids are not particularly reliable at twelve volts, even though the six volt starter does well at twelve volts. You could change to a later flywheel and twelve volt starter to eliminate that problem, but I think the stomp starter is more reliable anyway. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 637 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 637 | The push button starter and the floor starter are internally identical. The only difference being the power is supplied by a small switch on the foot job, but the solenoid starter has a copper washer that makes the contact. There will be no advantage to changing to the solenoid thing, but if you insist, I have a '54 GMC starter that has been remanufactured with all new stuff that I will trade for a foot setup. I just like the foot thing, I think its neat. I'm also changing my Hydramatic trans for a standard shift one, again I think it's neat. | | | | | Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 1,299 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 1,299 | I nay be interested in that trade. I have a foot stomp starter from my 54 Chev 235 truck. I also have bellhousing, linkage and all else. I switched over from 3 spped to Hydramatic. | | |
| |