| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
0 members (),
170
guests, and
3
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,081 Posts1,056,078 Members48,434 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 19 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 19 | Put in the new radiator, new hoses, gas tank and with a little sweat and blood got baby running and moving on her own yesterday. Now on to the next step....getting her to stop.
I have no problem with manual drum brakes - neither does the budget. And this subject was touched on briefly in another thread. Has anyone made the conversion from the single circuit to a dual circuit manual drum brake set up? In the other thread it was suggested that the MC out of a '67 was a direct bolt in for my '66.
Any help would be appreciated. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | I've not made this exact conversion so I can't speak to direct bolt-in from experience.
My bet is that the dual master will easily bolt up where the single is removed. Getting the right length rod may mean using the early or the late or even modifying one. Someone else may speak to that.
I think it was '68 that the dual master approach became required by law. '71 was when disk brakes became an option on these trucks and '72 they became standard. Looking at a truck built with dual master and front drum brakes should give you what you need.
Most likely you will need to do some plumbing to make it all work right. I'd suggest you find a '68 to '70 with the stock setup and study it a little before choosing or paying for any parts. You'll get a good idea how the factory solved the problems that way, and it should go easier than it might otherwise.
While the body changed in '67 the frame suspension and brakes are all basically the same. Years ago I parked a '66 and a '70 next to each other and in one weekend swapped the motors and drove both away. My memory of the effort is that they were extremely similar, even though the '66 was a Powerglide truck and the '70 was a manual transmission four-wheel-drive.
I currently have a '72 that is basically stock and a '55 1st that I've converted to dual master and front disks. I'll tell you what I can from those, but neither is quite what you are dealing with.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 2,384 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 2,384 | I didn't do it, but I bought a 66 for parts, it had a 67-70 master on it. No dist. block, they just added another line down to the TEE under the engine where it tees off to the rear. Truck stopped real good. I know a 71 manual brake master fits right where the single pot master was before. | | | | | Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 19 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 19 | Thanks guys. I have been trying to locate my old Bendix brake catalog but have had no luck. And now-a-days there are no old paper catalogs at the parts houses to do any research. They pretty much look at you like you are from Mars or something if you tell 'em what you're planning on doing.
I know I would have to replumb but was planning on replacing the steel lines and hoses anyway so that's no big deal - just buy the dual circuit set.
Well as this progresses I will keep ya'll informed. | | |
| |
| |