The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (Gray_Ghost, tclederman, Gdads51, moparguy, Otto Skorzeny, 1 invisible), 80 guests, and 12 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,078
Posts1,056,027
Members48,433
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#173460 01/10/2005 5:16 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 328
H
Member
Member
H Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 328
There's a guy down the street from me who's got a 1972 3/4 ton for sale. He only wants $1800 for it. Here's what it's got on it:
New Crate 350 motor from GM
New rebuilt Tranny TH400 Turbo Hydra-Matic
Performance Carb
All interior has been redone.
LWB
Alarm system (oops, I set it off and ran smile )

Well anyways, I asked him how good of gas mileage it got, because I'm not the richest person around. He said he didn't know, but he'd guess about 13-15 mpg. Is this right? I've never heard of one getting that good, and even if it's a 3/4 ton.

So anyways, anyone think this is a good deal or bad? I'm looking for a good truck, right now I've got an 81 that gets 8mpg, and I want something a little better. Then again, it's only 1800, and it's so beautiful smile

Oh, the cosmetics are a little bad - grille broken in one spot, bed just a little rusty, few scratches, nothing bad though.

Thanks, any replies will be helpful!


GO RANGERS grin
Photos Updated so check them out!
#173461 01/10/2005 5:34 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 565
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 565
The engine and tranny are worth the 1800.00 and it should get better than 8 m.p.g. I say go for it. Good luck.


"Do not walk behind me, for I may not lead. Do not walk ahead of me, for I may not follow. Do not walk beside me either. Just leave me alone, you're starting to freak me out."

1957 GMC 150
#173462 01/10/2005 5:38 AM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 523
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 523
Bout like mine.....mine has 135,000 on it and I'd not sell it for $1800

When gas was gas I'd get 15 but not for years now(mine has a big camper on it) I'm lucky to get 8 if I push it 75-80 it's half that

#173463 01/10/2005 5:46 AM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 36
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 36
The price sounds pretty good going by how you describe the truck. I'm assuming the body is in fairly good shape and it hasn’t had a lot of bondo or shoddy body repair work done. Invest in a small magnet and carefully check out the rocker areas, wheel wells and such. Also look at the floor pans and cab supports from underneath the cab. Sometimes the firewall and roofs on these trucks will rot out if they've sat outside a long time.

Going by your name and profile, it sounds like you deal with restorations so this advice is probably obvious to you.

As far a mileage, 13-15 mpg is the BEST this thing's going to get - that is going downhill with a strong tail wind. I get 12 MPG on the highway with my 327/4 speed 1/2 ton truck. I'd guess 8-10 mpg in town, 12-13 mpg highway is more realistic.

Good Luck!

#173464 01/10/2005 6:13 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
My '72 1/2-ton, loaded with a big utility bed and pulling a car behind it, got about 13 last summer. Better than I expected!

I'd be surprised if a 3/4-ton ever got any better than that.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
#173465 01/11/2005 6:00 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 328
H
Member
Member
H Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 328
Thus comes the rest of the story:
I went and checked it out today - Here's what happened.
It's got a bad upper A-Frame, it's not broken off, just the bearings are gone and will need to be replaced. Almost no rust, only a little on rocker panel. Bed is scratched up, like any bed off a truck. The owner said that the old gas tank had a lock on it, but he didn't have a key, so like an idiot, he took a hammer to the neck, and jacked it up. He said it started to leak a little, and so he took it out from behind the seat and put it up against the front bed panel, along with the sending unit, etc. connected. He said it works fine, just leaks a tad every now and then. I would have NO problem replacing that for SAFETY issues. The blower fan box is cracked open. He said that it will not take R-134, but rather R-12, so he bought a $65 adapter.
The interior:
He said that since the interior gauge lights sometimes do not work, he put a toggle switch under the dash that controls them. He also has a push button starter, since the old normal starter was broken.

Soo....with all these things, does anyone out there think that this is possibly a good truck? It has a really good body for being a 72. Original bumper, most everything works. doors are great. I just don't want to get myself into the situation I'm into now, with the gas crap.

Besides, I thought all that information above might trigger some thoughts to make this a longer post. smile Thanks!


GO RANGERS grin
Photos Updated so check them out!
#173466 01/11/2005 6:25 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
I'd look for another one.

The a-arm problem sounds like it has not been well-maintaned. The approach to fixing things sounds like there could be more surprises.

I'd check the receipts on that motor and transmission. If they check out and you want the parts the price might be fair, but based on how he has dealt with other things I'd pass.

Well okay, I'd drag it home as a parts truck if it were free.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
#173467 01/11/2005 6:46 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 328
H
Member
Member
H Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 328
Haha yes, he is a weird fellow. First he pulls up in his car with a beer - that's enough right there. But then he starts cussing like a maniac about the story of his truck...Yea, if it were free, it'd already be sitting in my driveway smile


GO RANGERS grin
Photos Updated so check them out!
#173468 01/11/2005 7:27 AM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 477
K
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
K Offline
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 477
do what ya want, but i think i would suspect everything the guy said was bogus unless you see it with your own eyes. 1800 ain't a bad price if the body is good, even if you have to rebuild the front end. if you are doing your own work, and want to keep the truck, then the price could be more than fair. that body style is pretty popular with collector types, with good resale values.
you are invited to visit the webshots site and check out my old 72 4wd. look under koolkar100.

#173469 01/11/2005 2:14 PM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 36
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 36
Is the paint original or is there newer paint hiding a bunch of sins?

If it's original paint and you can really tell that the body is good offer 1200 or 1500. He might go for it.

#173470 01/11/2005 2:43 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 142
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 142
I'd say it is a fair price considering the drivetrain is new , and the "rigging up " stuff can be taking care of pretty easily . As far as the gas mileage it would depend on how low of gears it has , my 72 1 ton got horrible mileage but it had 4:11 gears and the turbo 350 , but when the tranny went out I put a 700r4 in and it was more drivable ,not sure on the mileage but it was better!

#173471 01/11/2005 10:29 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
It all depends on how much of the work you can doyourself. If you had to pay a shop to do the work it could turn into a nightmare. Otherwise it sounds like a good buy. I,ve never been able to buy one that didn,t need a lot of work. smile


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
#173472 01/12/2005 2:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 24
T
Junior Member
Junior Member
T Offline
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 24
Your best hope for rear gears is 4:11. That's as high as 3/4 tons went in 72 if it has the normal HO52 axle. You'd have to get a 1/2 ton to get a 3:73 or 3:07 ratio.


Tender caretaker of antique tractors and old trucks.

Moderated by  Gdads51 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0