| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,068 Posts1,055,881 Members48,428 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#17042 12/27/2001 1:33 AM | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 142 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 142 | Have to put a new transmission in my '51 GMC 1/2 ton long bed. It presently has a 3 speed but I was wondering about a 4 speed. I have heard that you need a different u-joint for the 4 speed and there are abit hard to find. Since I have a a long bed and I have 2 u-joints I was wondering if I need t replace both or is only 1 that is different? Any preferences between the 3 and 4 speed? Tom | | |
#17043 12/27/2001 3:25 AM | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 1,248 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 1,248 | thomas, The transmission is more according to what you like. The three speed of course would be easier to install since you have the parts for it. My 1/2 ton had a four speed and I like it because it is sync in the top three gears. You would have to find a four speed from a half ton truck that would have the rear piece for the ball. My U-joint went bad on mine so I got a u-joint from a 3/4 ton. Had the rear part of the joint machined out and the rear part of a three speed joint welded in. Much more heavy duty than original joint. The early 3/4 ton Chevy trucks also had enclosed driveshaft between transmission and carrier bearing. I'm not sure up to what year they were made that way though, at least I think till '51 or so. I think the transmission would also work from these trucks, but you would still have to come up with a u-joint. I hope this will help.  | | |
#17044 12/28/2001 5:36 PM | Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 258 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 258 | Thomas,
Any '48 to '54 1/2-ton 4-speed should be a direct bolt-in.
The '48-'53 3/4-ton 4-speed also had the enclosed u-joint, and should work;
The 4-speed from the larger trucks had open driveshafts, and aside from that, are the same tranny.
Your limiting factor here is finding something that will adapt to your existing tourqe tube rear.
Is your 3-speed beyond re-build?
Frank McMullen 1941 Chevy dump truck 1949 GMC 100 pick-up 1954 Chevy 3600 pick-up 1955.1 4400 dump truck 1941 De Soto & other MoPars 1928 Model A F**D Special Coupe
| | |
#17045 12/28/2001 10:20 PM | Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 54 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 54 | Unless you want to keep it original-like I would go with a saginaw or better a t-5. Supposing you're using the original 228 stock. When the joints went out on mine they shreded the bells so I just tore the whole truck down to rebuild  . but seriously after driving mine as long as I did I was ready for that od. Should be an easy swap, you'll get your floor shifter too. Pick up a rear axle (125-150 bucks here) and get a driveshaft built (about the same as the rear) and a s-10 t-5 (I got one for $175, a good '95). Look into it if it's what you want. Should be great with that jimmy motor. Seeya  | | |
#17046 12/30/2001 8:50 PM | Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 18 Member | | Member Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 18 | I changed the 3 to a 4speed on my 54 3/4 ton just because i wouldnt have to deal with the linkage for the 3 speed and I found a nice 4speed for $100.I also like the floorshifting because it feels more direct. I didnt have the driveshaft problem because mine is not enclosed. good luck | | |
| |
| |