BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| |
11 members (homer52, Guitplayer, Hotrod Lincoln, 32vsnake, Charles in CA, Peggy M, TUTS 59, 46 Texaco, 3 invisible),
558
guests, and
1
robot. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums66 Topics126,776 Posts1,039,271 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | | | Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 285 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 285 | What are the good AND bad points to consider in having a 216 motor in your Stovebolt? :confused: | | | | Anonymous Unregistered | Anonymous Unregistered | Good Point - Original Motor Bad Point - Original Motor You could have had a V8! | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 203 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 203 | Brian, there's no good points about the 216 ... low pressure - just a poor design all round. I have one in the Canary it's been converted to shell bearings but I still am unfortable with it. | | | | Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 3,374 Moderator - The Electrical Bay | Moderator - The Electrical Bay Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 3,374 | Good Point = Mine has the only reference to the serial number on my title.
Bad Point = It's heavy as all get out, leaks oil and rusty water everywhere and it's sitting in the corner of my garage.
Bad Point #2 = It dont work.
Another quality post. Real Trucks Rattle HELP! The Paranoids are after me!
| | | | Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 1,586 Extreme Gabster | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 1,586 | Yup, those old motors are junk,the 10's of millions of Chevys made with them never got beyond the dealer's parking lot. For driving around or actually working the truck at speeds it was designed to run at, a good running 216 is fine.countless Chevy cars drove cross country with those engine. Countless Chevy trucks,overloaded,delivered the goods powered by 216's. Bad points,expensive to rebuild these days. In fact, 235's,261's and GMC's are all expensive to rebuild. | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 203 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 203 | LOL, true enough. Better stated that they are not designed for today's usages. | | | | Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 74 Member | Member Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 74 | put in a "late model" 235 and be done with it.
I am not bound to please thee with my answers. - William Shakespeare 1967 C10 1983 Olds Delta 88
| | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 975 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 975 | Good Point # 1- Mine runs Good Point # 2- Mine runs well and is still in the truck
Bad point- I am not sure what to do with it now that it is in there. Everyone tells me Fentons and a dual intake will kill it quickly. That will erase points one and two listed above..eliminating all good points about afore mentioned 216.
If I did not have the 216, I would probably not keep the closed driveline, tranny, brakes, etc....so my 216 is the driving force behind what I do to my truck....not sure why...but it is.... | | | | Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 384 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 384 | Oh great--now we're 216 bigots.  I gotta tell ya--good motors. Remember my Gramps truck--he drove it forever; till he died. He was a plumber--hauled his tools around in it--took it on vacations--went up Pike's Peak-truck did everything he asked of it. He kept it flawless shape always in the barn. I expect a lotta guys who have been on this site still have one--tuff motors. Technology has changed too--full pressure oiling (45psi) is available for the 216 from Beck\'s Machine and Tool They've also solved the notorious rear seal problem. Oh well, :rolleyes: everybody wants to tear em out and put in Bus Motors popular thing to do I guess--makin horses. Those 216s sure were quiet stout little engines though. Anybody can make a strong motor out of a lot of displacement. Would be really neat to see somebody(maybe one of the Deco Crowd) make a 216 with full pressure oiling and maybe a little overdrive. A rebuilt 216 that somebody made modern hiway capable would be something to be proud of--I'd sure be impressed. 
Buzz'n Half Dozen
| | | | Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 285 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 285 | Thank you all for your informative replies. I figured the 216 was not a motor of choice, and wanted to hear what our Stovebolt experts had to say. I'm convinced!  | | | | Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 175 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 175 | Mine runs well. I would say that if you have one, run it 'til it blows up, then replace it. If your's needs rebuilding, replace it.
Gravity - It's not just a good idea, it's the law.
| | | | Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 629 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2001 Posts: 629 | Wished you had not posted this one. I've been wrestling with this for three years now and have been restoring everything around mine. It turns but has not run in well over 20 years. The debate goes on.....rebuild it to keep it original or just go with a 235? I just keep hoping someone around here or on e-bay decides to "upgrade" their 216 they just rebuilt. That's when I'll be taking a road trip. Shortly after I got my truck three years ago I saw a beautiful 216 that was freshly rebuilt even with new gray paint and all the bolt-ons that ended up going on e-bay for under $1000. I'm still kicking myself for not bidding! You can see it in my "Details" photo album and the picture name is 216.
Tim Sheridan 1947 First Series Chevy 1/2-Ton"Liberty Series" - "Art Deco" - Whatever you'd like to call it. In the Gallery | | |
| |