The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
1 members (Southerntruck), 134 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,192
Posts1,057,353
Members48,469
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,907
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,907
All straight weight oils, such as SAE 30, have "Winter" weight viscosities ("W") but it's just not reported on the bottle, right? If you ran a "cold test" on your SAE 30 oil, you might have a 20W30 or 10W30. It's an xW30 where x = unknown.

Has anyone seen where the winter weight number has been reported for a straight weight oil? Just curious.

Last edited by Wally / Montana; 05/29/2025 3:53 PM.

1948 3/4-Ton 5-Window Flatbed Chevrolet

34 Years. Now with a '61 261, 848 head, Rochester Monojet carb, SM420 4-speed, 4.10 rear, dual reservoir MC, Bendix up front, 235/85R16 tires, 12-volt w/alternator, electric wipers and a modern radio in the glove box.
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,965
O
'Bolter
'Bolter
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,965
To figure that out, you'll have to look up look at the SAE J300 classification. The lower the number, the better the flow at low temperatures.

There are charts on the web that show the J300 viscosities of straight weight oils in cold temps.


1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy)

1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom) | 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck) | 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe |1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red) | 1969 Pontiac GTO (The Dishpit) I 1979 Ford F-100 | 1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red) | 1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,965
O
'Bolter
'Bolter
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,965
Here is the information you need all in one place:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAE_J300


1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy)

1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom) | 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck) | 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe |1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red) | 1969 Pontiac GTO (The Dishpit) I 1979 Ford F-100 | 1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red) | 1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,907
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,907
I don't want to figure something out. I wonder if anyone bought some Pennzoil SAE 30 and did the cold test on it (the special equipment would be required) and reported the winter weight. The number isn't on the bottle but it does exist. The winter weight probably varies between different batches.


1948 3/4-Ton 5-Window Flatbed Chevrolet

34 Years. Now with a '61 261, 848 head, Rochester Monojet carb, SM420 4-speed, 4.10 rear, dual reservoir MC, Bendix up front, 235/85R16 tires, 12-volt w/alternator, electric wipers and a modern radio in the glove box.
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,965
O
'Bolter
'Bolter
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,965
No it's not on the bottle but the chart shows its viscosity properties in cold weather.

The number SAE30 designates it's properties at engine operating temperature. All SAE30 oils must meet the same standard , regardless of brand.


1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy)

1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom) | 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck) | 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe |1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red) | 1969 Pontiac GTO (The Dishpit) I 1979 Ford F-100 | 1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red) | 1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,177
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,177
This may help you. But as you can see, it's THICK.
A multi-viscosity oil such as 10W30 has a viscosity of 30 weight at 100C and a viscosity of 10 weight at 0C.
Attachments
Viscosity Chart.jpg (14.07 KB, 123 downloads)
dynamic_viscosity_sae_vs_temperature.png (98.88 KB, 123 downloads)


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 114
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 114
If it's straight 30 weight, I don't think you'll find a "W" rating; as 30 shouldn't be used in winter nor would it pass the minimum viscosity tests for 0 deg.


Geoff

1955 2nd Series 3600 235 cid, 4 sp. - Current
1979 Chevy K10 350 cid 4 sp -Sold
1955 2nd Series Wide Window 283 cid 3 sp - Totaled
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,907
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,907
I'm having trouble explaining myself.

A straight weight oil, such as SAE 30, is actually "xW-30" where x is not known to the consumer. Perhaps it varies from batch to batch. Perhaps the x is too large. There has to be a result of some sort when you test the oil in a "cold test" machine. What would be typical?

Have you ever heard of someone putting a straight weight oil in the "cold test" machine and determining its winter weight number?

I'm just curious about a typical result. 25W30? or ?


1948 3/4-Ton 5-Window Flatbed Chevrolet

34 Years. Now with a '61 261, 848 head, Rochester Monojet carb, SM420 4-speed, 4.10 rear, dual reservoir MC, Bendix up front, 235/85R16 tires, 12-volt w/alternator, electric wipers and a modern radio in the glove box.
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,177
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,177
If you did a cold test on straight 30 weight oil, it would come up as 30 weight. Like the chart I posted, it would have a dynamic viscosity of 1.53+/- N s/m^2 versus a dynamic viscosity of 0.01 N s/m^2 at 100C.

The only thing that would change that would be adding viscosity index improver to the oil, which would then make it NOT straight 30 weight.

In other words, straight 30 weight oil is ------ wait for it -------- straight 30 weight oil.


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,310
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,310
The '52 Chevrolet operators manual suggests that if you will be operating in an extreme cold environment, you need to add kerosene to the straight 30 oil in order to be able to turn the engine over to start it.
So, with that said, in 1952 the straight 30 weight oil was in all likelihood straight 30 weight.
I do not understand why oil manufacturers today would formulate 30 weight any differently today than they did in 1952.
If they did add something to make today's 30 weight multi-viscosity, would that not be considered deceptive to the consumer?

Last edited by 52Carl; 05/30/2025 2:31 AM.

1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,965
O
'Bolter
'Bolter
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,965
It wouldn't be straight 30 weight then. If there were something added to a straight 30 weight (called viscosity index improvers) it has to be designated on the the label and would be considered a multi-viscosity oil, not a straight weight oil.

By definition, to meet SAE standards, 30 weight oil must meet all tests for 30 weight oils but MUST FAIL tests for 20 weight oils, for example.

You should also be aware that the numbering system 10w, 20w, 30, 40, etc. bears no relation to any specific test. The numbers merely rank oils in order of low viscosity to high viscosity without regard to any actual measurement. That is, 40 weight is not twice as viscous as 20 weight. The numbers simply make it easy for consumers to figure out what oil is thicker and what oil to put in their cars.


1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy)

1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom) | 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck) | 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe |1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red) | 1969 Pontiac GTO (The Dishpit) I 1979 Ford F-100 | 1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red) | 1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,511
J
Moderator, Electrical Bay
Moderator, Electrical Bay
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,511
Well, since we seldom get much real winter weather here (aside from a freak cold/ice storm every once in a while) I just use 30 weight all the time.


~ Jon
1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,243
Herder of Cats, Goats, and Sheep (moderator)
Herder of Cats, Goats, and Sheep (moderator)
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,243
Originally Posted by Wally / Montana
I'm having trouble explaining myself.

A straight weight oil, such as SAE 30, is actually "xW-30" where x is not known to the consumer. Perhaps it varies from batch to batch. Perhaps the x is too large. There has to be a result of some sort when you test the oil in a "cold test" machine. What would be typical?

Have you ever heard of someone putting a straight weight oil in the "cold test" machine and determining its winter weight number?

I'm just curious about a typical result. 25W30? or ?

30W oil is 30W30.
20W oil is 20W20.

If it is a straight weight weight, it is the viscosity of that weight oil at all temperatures.

Just to be clear, it is not the *same* viscosity at all temperatures, it is the viscosity of that weight oil.


From the Rocky Mountains?
Check in with the RM Bolters!
HiPo Forum Moderator

1958 Task Force Truck
"Frank" gets a new lease on life
Follow in the DITY Gallery
1959 3200 Task Force
The Ballad of Enkidu
The Saga in the DITY Gallery ~ and the story continues
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,881
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,881
Woodsy Owl says "WHOOOOOO- - - - - -CARES?" 30 weight oil is too thick for anything but extremely hot climates. You'll beat the rod bearings to death on a cold startup before they get enough oil pressure to lubricate them properly in all but the hottest summer weather. On an old engine with three times the recommended rod bearing clearance due to worn bearings, it might prolong the engine life a while before it beats itself into oblivion.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0