BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| |
11 members (52Carl, Otto Skorzeny, Fifty-Five First, Danielbolt, Peggy M, Bill Hanlon, Waveski, Lightholder's Dad, hapydirty, Guitplayer, cspecken),
530
guests, and
1
robot. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums66 Topics126,781 Posts1,039,301 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | | | Joined: Jun 2023 Posts: 143 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2023 Posts: 143 | Is it possible to run a stock GM manifold with Fenton headers without heating the fuel. I understand why a stock exhaust manifold heats the fuel on a cold engine, and closes on a warm engine. I really do not want to remove the headers and stainless exhaust, but if the prevents me from having a smooth running engine I will remove it. I purchase a new stock exhaust system from Waldron's in the event I cannot run the system mentioned above. The average winter temp here in SW fl. is 75-54 degrees. and in the summer just hot.
Lookin for advice Red
1950 5 Window
| | | | Joined: Mar 2014 Posts: 4,210 Moderator, Electrical Bay | Moderator, Electrical Bay Joined: Mar 2014 Posts: 4,210 | Red in my experience the originally designed scheme for heating the intake manifold is hard to beat. It was used for many years and it worked extremely well when kept in good nick.
Certainly using water to heat it is not effective and in my opinion almost a joke. I have not seen a single header design that accomplished what the stock setup did. Living in Dallas our weather isn't dramatically different from yours in Naples...actually our summers are hotter (yesterday was 103) and still I would not want to deviate from the stock design. Getting a smooth running engine (not to overlook an economically running engine) requires several things be in balance. When they are, all is well.
I'm sure some folks will appear soon with some other ideas. Good luck to you no matter what you choose.
~ Jon 1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end
| | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 28,675 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 28,675 | It's possible to tap exhaust gas off the Fentons and circulate it under the intake with a heat transfer block bolted to the underside of the stock intake. That's much better than using coolant- - - -which is COLD at precisely the time it needs to be several hundred degrees. It's still not as efficient as the original equipment setup, but it's better than nothing. Send me a PM if you like and I'll get more specific about how to do the heat transfer setup.
Running Fentons and dual exhausts is a very good example of why doing race stuff on a street engine is stupid squared! Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,993 Crusty Old Sarge | Crusty Old Sarge Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,993 | Why can't you just use a heater exchanger like this one from Speedway? It would bolt to the bottom of your intake and feed exhaust gases from the headers. GM L6 Manifold Heat Kit, 216/235/261 Fenton Headers
~ Craig 1958 Viking 4400"The Book of Thor"Read the story in the DITY1960 Chevrolet C10"A Family Heirloom"Follow the story in the DITY Gallery'59 Apache 31, 327 V8 (0.030 over), Muncie M20 4 Speed, GM 10 Bolt Rear... long term project (30 years and counting) Come Bleed or Blister, something has got to give!!! | Living life in the SLOW lane | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 28,675 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 28,675 | TUTS 59 -- The tubing is too small, and it's a dead end road- - - -no way to get any gas flow. That "kit" is worse than useless. It fools people into thinking they're accomplishing something. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | Joined: Jun 2023 Posts: 143 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2023 Posts: 143 | Ok, Stock all the way.
Red
1950 5 Window
| | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 4,886 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 4,886 | You can wrap copper tubing around a header tube and the intake with both ends open, the heat will flow up the tube and around the intake. Not the best way but it will work. You can also heat the air using a newer air filter housing and stove pipe tubing, still better then nothing but useful. Even in 75* weather, a hot intake is needed to keep the fuel vaporized. I had a triple carb intake for awhile with no heat, it took forever to run decent, and even then it wasn't all the great. | | | | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 1,878 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: May 2001 Posts: 1,878 | Consider a frost plug heater in the block under the manifold. I have taken my '48 (with '61 261) to work as low as 20 below with 4 hrs of heating on a timer. When it got that cold, I would also put a magnetic heater on the oil pan all night.
You won't need to go to that extreme but mine would run great after just 4 hrs of heating.
Last edited by Wally / Montana; 05/16/2025 3:24 PM.
1948 3/4-Ton 5-Window Flatbed Chevrolet 33 Years. Now with a '61 261, 848 head, Rochester Monojet carb, SM420 4-speed, 4.10 rear, dual reservoir MC, Bendix up front, 235/85R16 tires, 12-volt w/alternator, electric wipers and a modern radio in the glove box.
| | | | Joined: Dec 2017 Posts: 1,609 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2017 Posts: 1,609 | Water heat is fine. Its not like you are driving it as a daily driver. The intake needs a little heat to help with atomization. It will take the motor a few minutes of warm up to get to 180 where the therm opens and you are all set.
The stock set up is of course the better engineered set up and it plain works, as long as the butterfly is not frozen or the spring is not broken.
Running multi carbs, there is always a little trade off. I run the water to my Clifford 2X2 and the motor, with two Holley 2300 350 cfm carbs, runs fine.
On the other hand, if you are running or want to run a single carb, then use the stock exhaust manifold. You will be much happier. If you want, you can split the stock manifold.
Mike
| | | | Joined: Jul 2014 Posts: 854 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2014 Posts: 854 | I have run a setup like shown on the Speedway site, though I fabricated it myself, for 20+ years. It does work reasonably well, though I've wondered about the intake getting too hot in warm weather when pulling a hill. There is enough gas transfer back and forth due to rhythmic pressure differential to heat the intake manifold. I have an Offenhauser two single barrel manifold. It has provision for a factory-style heater for when you're running a stock exhaust manifold. I just took a quarter inch plate and drilled a couple of holes in it for the pipe fittings. I believe I used 3/8" copper tube. Works well even in Wally Montana winters, which we have where I live. On the humid coast it suffers from carburetor icing at idle until the thermostat opens. But that was a problem when it was stock. The carb(s) has a thick heat insulator under it. 1951 3800 1-ton"Earning its keep from the get-go"In the DITY Gallery1962 261 (w/cam, Fenton headers, 2 carbs, MSD ign.), SM420 & Brown-Lipe 6231A 3spd aux. trans, stock axles & brakes. Owned since 1971. | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 Renaissance Man | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 | Most of the wear of these engine occurs during warmup. This is due to unburned fuel washing the oil away from the cylinders until the intake warms up allowing the air/fuel to stay in suspension. The flapper in the cold engine position puts lots of exhaust heat to the underside of the intake, warming it up in a very short time. Without that feature, you will experience more cylinder wear than normal, and crankcase contamination which will cause undue wear to bearings. If you don't have the original intake/exhaust setup with a functioning flapper valve, you would be well advised to check for gasoline smell on your dipstick frequently and change the oil more frequently that every 3,000 miles.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 1,363 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 1,363 | I'll second Carl, you need heat to a cold intake for both drivability engine longevity. I have been down the Fenton road with coolant heat then exhaust heat. Now I run factory set up.
BC 1960 Chevy C10 driver 261 T5 4.10 dana 44 power loc 1949 GMC 250 project in waiting 1960 C60 pasture art Retired GM dealer tech. 1980 - 2022 | | |
| |