There is a thread running on gas tank sending unit function. In that thread there are multiple references to grounding the sending unit. I didn’t want to hijack that thread , so here I am.
My sending unit does not have a ground wire. I was thinking that it probably grounded through contact of tank to cab, but in the course of installing my new tank I padded all the contact points. I thought I might have lost the ground contact- but I poured 5 gallons into the tank today and the gauge read 1/4 , so function checks.
Here’s my question: Should that tank be grounded , sending unit function aside? Should I be installing a ground wire to avoid static buildup, that sort of thing? If so , can I attach at a sending unit fastener?
By grounding the sending unit you are grounding the tank. The screws will ground the tank. Mine has a short jumper from the sending unit screw to the stiffening support on the back of the cab.
Phil Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals
1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes Project Journals Stovebolt Gallery Forum
What Buckshot says... my 54 3100 is factory grounded like that.
~~ Jethro 1954 3100 Back to Life In the Dity Gallery 1951 3100 (gone) / 1956 4400 (still in the neighborhood) / 1957 6400 with dump body (retired) / 1959 3100 panel (in the woods junked) / 1978 Custom Deluxe K10 / 1993 S-10 4.3 / 2004 Chevy Crew Cab / 1945 John Deere H / 1952 John Deere B / 1966 John Deere 2510 / 1967 John Deere 1020
Grounding the tank is also a good idea for disipation of static electricity. On modern vehicles they have a ground wire from the fuel filler for that reason.
As I mentioned earlier, I used a soft interface at all the metal to metal hard points when I installed the new tank, so I may have lost ground contact. A good reason to take the easy precaution of grounding the tank.
Now, one might wonder why my sending unit and fuel gauge are functioning well without any apparent ground, but I guess I shouldn’t question success. Which brings us to –- I dragged my feet on the grounding issue because the fuel gauge system is working as is. One might say that I am about to fix something that ain’t broke……
Gas tanks should be grounded, and I will ground mine. I just hope that my sending unit doesn’t take that as an insult.
The body of the tank was never designed to be grounded. The sending unit was designed to be grounded via a ground wire which has a ring connector which goes under one of the sending unit screws. The other end of that wire goes straight down in front of the tank, through the floor, then forward to a nut and bolt which holds a wire strap. That end goes under that wire strap to be in direct contact with the cab. This nut and bolt is located under the driver seat.
Last edited by 52Carl; 04/13/202411:22 PM.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
That wire grounds the gas tank as well as the sending unit. Unless you're using non-conductive screws to hold the sending unit to the tank.
Kevin 1951 Chevy 3100 work truck Follow this saga in Project Journal Photos 1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car) Busting rust since the mid-60's If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
In your mind, does it somehow seem necessary to ground a gas tank? The OP expressed that it was necessary to ground his tank. I had horrible thoughts of him drilling a hole in his tank for a ground strap. That is why I clarified the sole purpose of the ground under a sending unit hold down screw was to ground the sending unit.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
It's always been my belief and observation that early trucks had no ground wire to sender. They relied on ground contact thru sender screws to tank and tank touching frame. So when someone had trouble, we advised to add a ground from screw head to frame. Later years there was a tab on the sender for a ground wire. I don't know what Chevy "engineers" thought when sender has a gasket and tank had cushions under tank straps. I do not know exactly what AD had or did. My experience is 55.2-66 and up. The steel gas line would possibly ground the sender on it's way to fuel pump, at a line clamp somewhere, but it had a rubber hose near outlet.
Bottom line: Waveski's question is a trick question Yes, the tank needs to be grounded to ground the sender. Other than that, no it does not. As everyone knows, the tank is hard to ground and maintain todays good idea to re-pad the straps/add cushions/whatever. The sender itself has a gasket. Small screws are not a super way to ground. Hence the newer truck's senders have a dedicated tab built in. So if you don't want to have trouble, ground the sender flange by adding a wire from a screw to the frame and don't ask questions. (second smilley face is non binding)
This is what Carl said in a much more friendly way and a lot less words.... and a lot less coffee.
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Hey Carl - Give me half a break here. Do you really think I’d take a drill to my new gas tank- the tank that is my reward for holding firm with Spectra Premium for over a month as they passed me off from one person to the next, even putting a technician on the phone who barely spoke English?
What the Helios???
My sending unit works just fine as is. Maybe I’ll ground it, maybe I won’t. Forget that I asked. This thread has run its course.
Imagine a smiley face here if you wish. I don’t use emojis.
Waveski, We're good Wave. My concern was not directed at you specifically. There are a lot of newbies who wind up in here and I was just trying to clarify how the senders were grounded originally.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
It's always been my belief and observation that early trucks had no ground wire to sender. They relied on ground contact thru sender screws to tank and tank touching frame. So when someone had trouble, we advised to add a ground from screw head to frame. Later years there was a tab on the sender for a ground wire. I don't know what Chevy "engineers" thought when sender has a gasket and tank had cushions under tank straps. I do not know exactly what AD had or did. My experience is 55.2-66 and up. The steel gas line would possibly ground the sender on it's way to fuel pump, at a line clamp somewhere, but it had a rubber hose near outlet.
Bottom line: Waveski's question is a trick question Yes, the tank needs to be grounded to ground the sender. Other than that, no it does not. As everyone knows, the tank is hard to ground and maintain todays good idea to re-pad the straps/add cushions/whatever. The sender itself has a gasket. Small screws are not a super way to ground. Hence the newer truck's senders have a dedicated tab built in. So if you don't want to have trouble, ground the sender flange by adding a wire from a screw to the frame and don't ask questions. (second smilley face is non binding)
This is what Carl said in a much more friendly way and a lot less words.... and a lot less coffee.
Bartamos, ole pal. The ring connector for the ground wire is held down by a small sending unit screw, but that ring connector makes very good contact with the top of the sending unit which is all that is needed to make it work. If one were to use a sturdy screw which did not conduct electricity whatsoever, the ring connector would still be securely grounded to the top of the sending unit, would it not?
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
I am going to throw another monkey wrench into this discussion. The original tanks were not painted, nor were the tank straps. Given this, the tank would have been grounded in effect. So why did they add a ground wire under a sending unit screws on one end while the other end of the ground wire was placed under the cab, under a preexisting nut and bolt which held a wire clamp. Maybe they had issues with the tanks remaining grounded early on and this ground wire was a bandaid fix implemented an all trucks from that point forward. It would not be the first odd bandaid fix implemented on AD trucks through the long run of production.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Carl I know you try hard to conflict with me but you are not up to it today. Ole pal
Allow me to explain my comments.
1. Screw comment had nothing to do with screw and ring tongue being a good ground. That's why I said that we always suggest that. I am probably one of the first, if not THE first, to suggest that way back. It's a direct wire from flange to frame using the screw head as a clamp.
2. The comment was made about the original method of grounding the flange which has an "insulator" gasket. So the ground path was thru small screw threads into tank. I said "not a "super" way to ground." Meaning you should NOT rely on just screw thread for a ground. The tank, painted or not, had "insulator" pads under the straps on vehicles I've had. This underscores why so many folks post about gas gauges. Something was wrong with the initial factory idea or it did not last. Good ground is extra crucial in the way the rheostat and gauge work together.
3. I also said "I do not know exactly what AD had or did. My experience is 55.2-66 and up."
4. I did not know they added "a ground wire under a sending unit screws on one end while the other end of the ground wire was placed under the cab, under a preexisting nut and bolt which held a wire clamp." as you say. I don't know who "they" are. So I can't answer that for you.
5. Peggy has asked several times the past month NOT to quote, using quote.
Let's don't prolong this simple issue for no reason. I tried to complement and be kind to you in my post and use a touch of humor to Waveski. TWO emogeees! Geees boys.
Last edited by Phak1; 04/16/20245:16 PM.
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
I agree and I’m closing it to any more conversations.
Phil Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals
1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes Project Journals Stovebolt Gallery Forum