The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
5 members (Wally / Montana, J Lucas, Gray_Ghost, 2 invisible), 47 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,075
Posts1,055,918
Members48,429
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1543770 04/12/2024 7:02 PM
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
There is a thread running on gas tank sending unit function. In that thread there are multiple references to grounding the sending unit. I didn’t want to hijack that thread , so here I am.

My sending unit does not have a ground wire. I was thinking that it probably grounded through contact of tank to cab, but in the course of installing my new tank I padded all the contact points. I thought I might have lost the ground contact- but I poured 5 gallons into the tank today and the gauge read 1/4 , so function checks.

Here’s my question:
Should that tank be grounded , sending unit function aside?
Should I be installing a ground wire to avoid static buildup, that sort of thing? If so , can I attach at a sending unit fastener?

Input , please.
Attachments
AE69611C-29D2-4800-B598-6C5908FE8822.jpeg (368.01 KB, 164 downloads)

Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,476
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,476
By grounding the sending unit you are grounding the tank. The screws will ground the tank. Mine has a short jumper from the sending unit screw to the stiffening support on the back of the cab.


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
Ok , that’s a good way to ground the tank.
But does the tank need to be grounded? Is that a standard procedure?

Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 322
T
Professional procrastinator
Professional procrastinator
T Offline
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 322
The gauge needs to have a clean ground. (On edit, I really did mean to type sending unit, not gauge)

Last edited by Twin Jimmys; 04/15/2024 11:38 AM.

1947.2 GMC 1/2T SWB panel
1947.2 GMC 1/2T long bed
1948 GMC 1/2T short bed

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,307
K
'Bolter
'Bolter
K Offline
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,307
My 54 has a ground wire like Phil described and it looked factory if someone has a 54 wire diagram maybe it can be confirmed.


1954 Canadian GMC 9300
"The Journey"
Follow in the DITY
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
It seems that there is nothing to lose by grounding the tank.
Grounding the tank will also ground the sending unit (which is working fine as …)

I’ll ground my new tank on Monday.

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,987
7
'Bolter
'Bolter
7 Offline
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,987
My '57 is grounded at one of the sending unit screws to the rear of the cab.


1957 Chevrolet 5700 LCF 283 SM420 2 speed rear, 1955 IH 300U T/A, 1978 Corvette 350 auto, 1978 Yamaha DT175, 1999 Harley Davidson Softail Fat Boy
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
I will do something similar.

Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 557
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 557
What Buckshot says... my 54 3100 is factory grounded like that.


~~ Jethro
1954 3100
Back to Life
In the Dity Gallery
1951 3100 (gone) / 1956 4400 (still in the neighborhood) / 1957 6400 with dump body (retired) / 1959 3100 panel (in the woods junked) / 1978 Custom Deluxe K10 / 1993 S-10 4.3 / 2004 Chevy Crew Cab / 1945 John Deere H / 1952 John Deere B / 1966 John Deere 2510 / 1967 John Deere 1020
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 1,368
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 1,368
Grounding the tank is also a good idea for disipation of static electricity. On modern vehicles they have a ground wire from the fuel filler for that reason.


1949/50 3600 Project
Follow in Project Journals
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
As I mentioned earlier, I used a soft interface at all the metal to metal hard points when I installed the new tank, so I may have lost ground contact. A good reason to take the easy precaution of grounding the tank.

Now, one might wonder why my sending unit and fuel gauge are functioning well without any apparent ground, but I guess I shouldn’t question success.
Which brings us to –- I dragged my feet on the grounding issue because the fuel gauge system is working as is. One might say that I am about to fix something that ain’t broke……

Gas tanks should be grounded, and I will ground mine. I just hope that my sending unit doesn’t take that as an insult.

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
The body of the tank was never designed to be grounded.
The sending unit was designed to be grounded via a ground wire which has a ring connector which goes under one of the sending unit screws. The other end of that wire goes straight down in front of the tank, through the floor, then forward to a nut and bolt which holds a wire strap. That end goes under that wire strap to be in direct contact with the cab. This nut and bolt is located under the driver seat.

Last edited by 52Carl; 04/13/2024 11:22 PM.

1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,052
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,052
That wire grounds the gas tank as well as the sending unit. Unless you're using non-conductive screws to hold the sending unit to the tank.


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
In your mind, does it somehow seem necessary to ground a gas tank?
The OP expressed that it was necessary to ground his tank. I had horrible thoughts of him drilling a hole in his tank for a ground strap.
That is why I clarified the sole purpose of the ground under a sending unit hold down screw was to ground the sending unit.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
It's always been my belief and observation that early trucks had no ground wire to sender. They relied on ground contact thru sender screws to tank and tank touching frame. So when someone had trouble, we advised to add a ground from screw head to frame. Later years there was a tab on the sender for a ground wire. I don't know what Chevy "engineers" thought when sender has a gasket and tank had cushions under tank straps. I do not know exactly what AD had or did. My experience is 55.2-66 and up. The steel gas line would possibly ground the sender on it's way to fuel pump, at a line clamp somewhere, but it had a rubber hose near outlet.

Bottom line: Waveski's question is a trick question smile
Yes, the tank needs to be grounded to ground the sender. Other than that, no it does not. As everyone knows, the tank is hard to ground and maintain todays good idea to re-pad the straps/add cushions/whatever. The sender itself has a gasket. Small screws are not a super way to ground. Hence the newer truck's senders have a dedicated tab built in. So if you don't want to have trouble, ground the sender flange by adding a wire from a screw to the frame and don't ask questions. smile (second smilley face is non binding)

This is what Carl said in a much more friendly way and a lot less words.... and a lot less coffee.


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
Hey Carl -
Give me half a break here. Do you really think I’d take a drill to my new gas tank- the tank that is my reward for holding firm with Spectra Premium for over a month as they passed me off from one person to the next, even putting a technician on the phone who barely spoke English?

What the Helios???

My sending unit works just fine as is. Maybe I’ll ground it, maybe I won’t. Forget that I asked.
This thread has run its course.

Imagine a smiley face here if you wish. I don’t use emojis.

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
Waveski,
We're good Wave. My concern was not directed at you specifically. There are a lot of newbies who wind up in here and I was just trying to clarify how the senders were grounded originally.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
Originally Posted by bartamos
It's always been my belief and observation that early trucks had no ground wire to sender. They relied on ground contact thru sender screws to tank and tank touching frame. So when someone had trouble, we advised to add a ground from screw head to frame. Later years there was a tab on the sender for a ground wire. I don't know what Chevy "engineers" thought when sender has a gasket and tank had cushions under tank straps. I do not know exactly what AD had or did. My experience is 55.2-66 and up. The steel gas line would possibly ground the sender on it's way to fuel pump, at a line clamp somewhere, but it had a rubber hose near outlet.

Bottom line: Waveski's question is a trick question smile
Yes, the tank needs to be grounded to ground the sender. Other than that, no it does not. As everyone knows, the tank is hard to ground and maintain todays good idea to re-pad the straps/add cushions/whatever. The sender itself has a gasket. Small screws are not a super way to ground. Hence the newer truck's senders have a dedicated tab built in. So if you don't want to have trouble, ground the sender flange by adding a wire from a screw to the frame and don't ask questions. smile (second smilley face is non binding)

This is what Carl said in a much more friendly way and a lot less words.... and a lot less coffee.
Bartamos, ole pal. The ring connector for the ground wire is held down by a small sending unit screw, but that ring connector makes very good contact with the top of the sending unit which is all that is needed to make it work.
If one were to use a sturdy screw which did not conduct electricity whatsoever, the ring connector would still be securely grounded to the top of the sending unit, would it not?


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
I am going to throw another monkey wrench into this discussion.
The original tanks were not painted, nor were the tank straps.
Given this, the tank would have been grounded in effect.
So why did they add a ground wire under a sending unit screws on one end while the other end of the ground wire was placed under the cab, under a preexisting nut and bolt which held a wire clamp.
Maybe they had issues with the tanks remaining grounded early on and this ground wire was a bandaid fix implemented an all trucks from that point forward.
It would not be the first odd bandaid fix implemented on AD trucks through the long run of production.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
Carl I know you try hard to conflict with me but you are not up to it today. Ole pal

Allow me to explain my comments.

1. Screw comment had nothing to do with screw and ring tongue being a good ground. That's why I said that we always suggest that. I am probably one of the first, if not THE first, to suggest that way back. It's a direct wire from flange to frame using the screw head as a clamp.

2. The comment was made about the original method of grounding the flange which has an "insulator" gasket. So the ground path was thru small screw threads into tank. I said "not a "super" way to ground." Meaning you should NOT rely on just screw thread for a ground. The tank, painted or not, had "insulator" pads under the straps on vehicles I've had. This underscores why so many folks post about gas gauges. Something was wrong with the initial factory idea or it did not last. Good ground is extra crucial in the way the rheostat and gauge work together.

3. I also said "I do not know exactly what AD had or did. My experience is 55.2-66 and up."

4. I did not know they added "a ground wire under a sending unit screws on one end while the other end of the ground wire was placed under the cab, under a preexisting nut and bolt which held a wire clamp." as you say. I don't know who "they" are. So I can't answer that for you.

5. Peggy has asked several times the past month NOT to quote, using quote.

Let's don't prolong this simple issue for no reason. I tried to complement and be kind to you in my post and use a touch of humor to Waveski. TWO emogeees! Geees boys.

Last edited by Phak1; 04/16/2024 5:16 PM.

Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,476
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,476
As Waveski put it,
Originally Posted by Waveski
This thread has run its course.
I agree and I’m closing it to any more conversations.


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum

Moderated by  ndkid275, Phak1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0