The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
2 members (DadsFirstPickup, greenie-reddy), 105 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,184
Posts1,057,195
Members48,465
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1540811 03/18/2024 9:25 PM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 9
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 9
I'm setting up a 292 with a 700r4. I want to calculate and install the rear end gear, with the wheels that I have, for the best cruisin RPM (mainly for mileage).
What would be the best RPM for a 292, to shoot for? The engine is basically stock.
I am also trying to figure out the best carb for mileage. Presently, I have a Weber 32/36 DGEV200 12091 ser.430
(This is all in a '64 GMC van.)
TIA!!

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,308
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,308
What is the height of the tires going to be?


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,510
J
Moderator, Electrical Bay
Moderator, Electrical Bay
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,510
The 1964 292 had a pretty decent net torque line...from around 1600 out to around 24~2500 so I'd be inclined to stay down in the 1800 to 2000 rpm range for highway driving with the best gas mileage. However, that wasn't known as a high efficiency engine. It was said about the 292 they could pass nearly anything...except a gas station.


~ Jon
1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,875
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Online: Content
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,875
The 292 was designed to compete with the 300 cubic inch Ford inline six- - - -both of them made for use in medium-duty box vans, school buses, and other gas guzzlers. They spent most of the time lugged down and pulling hard, at or near their rated top RPM and horsepower ranges. Getting good gas mileage from either engine is about as likely as finding a chicken with lips. I'd suggest gearing for a cruise RPM in top gear of around 2100-2300 RPM or so, which is right in the middle of ther engine's torque band. That will allow for a light throttle opening, especially with a real carburetor such as a Carter YF. A Weber makes a pretty good sinker when bottom fishing for BIG catfish.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 9
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 9
Tire height is 25 1/2 and circum. 81 1/2.
To be honest, I don't think it is a '64 engine. That is just what it's in. I never check the numbers to see what year.
Yeah, I know she won't sip the go-juice, especially since I'm pushing a barn door down the road but I'd like to set her up the best I can while I'm doing it.
I certainly am not attached at the hip with Weber. It does however have the linkage in the correct direction. So you suggest a Carter YF?? Would that be the best with a stock manifold? I will look one up.
THANKS gents!! I really appreciate all the help and your time.
Chaz

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,875
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Online: Content
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,875
Therer is a Carter YF calibrated for a Ford 300 that should be close to the right mixture for a Chevy 292, definitely better than the Rochester that was OEM. You can also tinker with the mixture without changing jets or making permanent modifications by altering the float level a little at a time- - - -a higher level goes rich, and lowering the level leans things out a little. Just don't get the float high enough to cause flooding at idle.
Jerry

Last edited by Phak1; 03/20/2024 11:30 AM. Reason: Spelling

"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,512
P
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
P Offline
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,512
I have to moved this thread to the Greasy Spoon. The Stovebolt forum is for Chevy and GMC trucks and unfortunately vans don’t qualify as trucks under the present forum guidelines. If the thread stayed on just talk about the engine, I could allow it to continue, but once the thread started talking about tire size, that crossed the line and forced me to move it.

You can continue this thread in the Greasy Spoon as you wish.


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 9
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 9
I hope it will continue. I am learning a lot. To be honest tho, I thought a Van would/could be classified as a truck. My day, in the '70's, it was "Keep on Truckin", and that implied vans. Oh well. I was also here because I thought Stove Bolts referred to inline sixes. Sorry for the mistake.
I am still rather interested in Carbs. Thanks Hotrod Lincoln.

I also came up with a 323 gear as probably a good one. I plugged in a computer (on a gear site) 2000 RPM, .7 trany gear, tire height 25.5 and speed was 67 MPH. I understand I can get a rear end out of a "whale wagon" that will fit my "vehicle".

Thanks again guys!! You have helped me a LOT!

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,308
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,308
There are online calculators which can help you determine what rear axle ratio to choose. All you need is the tire height, overdrive ratio and desired RPM in overdrive.
I don't have that online calculator site handy. Maybe someone else can chime in.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 901
5
'Bolter
'Bolter
5 Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 901


Brian
1955.2 3100 Truck
The older I get the more dangerous I am!!!!!
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,512
P
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
P Offline
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,512
After discussion, John decided that Vans did qualify as trucks as they’re built on truck chassis’s. With this decision, I moved this thread to a more appropriate forum, Driveline.

Last edited by Phak1; 04/21/2024 3:01 PM.

Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0