The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Labor Day

Labor Day

Putting down your wrenches or time for
MORE wrenching?

Wrenching this Labor Day
Plenty of places to share.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (cmayna, Otto Skorzeny, Rusty Heaps, Gdads51), 45 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,018
Posts1,055,256
Members48,417
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,660
B
Curmudgeon
Curmudgeon
B Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,660
When I said, "determine your shift points", I wasn't thinking of creating new internal transmission ratios. I should have said "see or visualize your shift points". The graph shows three slopes. The more vertical the slope the less time you have to do your shifting in the power band. At least this is how I see it. Hopefully someone will speak up if I'm in the ditch.

The graph can be used to help visualize, in a very rough way, the transmission you have now and the transmission you thinking about going to. Based on past conversations we have 3 speed, 3 speed O/D, 4 speed (SM420), 4 speed Hydramatic, conversions with 3 and 4 speed Saginaw transmissions, Tremec versions, T-5 and others. I've heard it said that you don't need a T5. A 4 speed Saginaw with a 3:11 first gear and a ?? rear axle ratio with ?? tire size will give you the same results.

To continue on, we figured out the cruising speed but what about launching this heavy metal truck to get it moving? As a general rule you want the launching gear ratio times the rear axle ratio to be around 9. A plain 3 speed with first gear of 2.85 times 2.70 (gas saving Camaro rear axle) = 7.7. You have to ride the clutch to get the truck to move. Ask me how I know. A 4 speed Saginaw with first gear of 3.50 times 4.11 (generic truck axle) = 14.4. Jack rabbit starts. A few dragstrip pulls then failure.

Looking back at 52Carl's setup. First gear is a granny so it is given that you launch in second gear of 2.37 (I am assuming this is the correct ratio for his transmission) times 4.64 = 11. That is on the stout side. He probably gives it light pedal to get it moving "pulling stumps down the road".

Last edited by buoymaker; 10/15/2022 9:47 PM.

"Adding CFM to a truck will only help at engine speeds you don't want to use."
"I found there was nothing to gain beyond 400 CFM."
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,270
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,270
Originally Posted by buoymaker
When I said, "determine your shift points", I wasn't thinking of creating new internal transmission ratios. I should have said "see or visualize your shift points". The graph shows three slopes. The more vertical the slope the less time you have to do your shifting in the power band. At least this is how I see it. Hopefully someone will speak up if I'm in the ditch.

The graph can be used to help visualize, in a very rough way, the transmission you have now and the transmission you thinking about going to. Based on past conversations we have 3 speed, 3 speed O/D, 4 speed (SM420), 4 speed Hydramatic, conversions with 3 and 4 speed Saginaw transmissions, Tremec versions, T-5 and others. I've heard it said that you don't need a T5. A 4 speed Saginaw with a 3:11 first gear and a ?? rear axle ratio with ?? tire size will give you the same results.

To continue on, we figured out the cruising speed but what about launching this heavy metal truck to get it moving? As a general rule you want the launching gear ratio times the rear axle ratio to be around 9. A plain 3 speed with first gear of 2.85 times 2.70 (gas saving Camaro rear axle) = 7.7. You have to ride the clutch to get the truck to move. Ask me how I know. A 4 speed Saginaw with first gear of 3.50 times 4.11 (generic truck axle) = 14.4. Jack rabbit starts. A few dragstrip pulls then failure.

Looking back at 52Carl's setup. First gear is a granny so it is given that you launch in second gear of 2.37 (I am assuming this is the correct ratio for his transmission) times 4.64 = 11. That is on the stout side. He probably gives it light pedal to get it moving "pulling stumps down the road".
That stout first gear with that 4.64 rear end gears comes in handy when traffic is at a crawl. Leave it in first and snail along. It rolls right along without my foot on the gas. This setup would be perfect for teaching a newby how to drive a stick. It is hard to stall it out when upshifting. I will say again that going from 28" to 30.5 tires made 1st gear much more useful to start out in.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,270
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,270
Originally Posted by D B Cooper
52Carl’s real world experience with a tire diameter change is what I’m more interested in.

Anybody out there have a Task Force truck with a 235, three speed transmission, 338 gears and 30” tires? How does the truck perform with that tall of tire? What kind of RPMs are you turning at 60 MPH on a flat road? What’s your average MPG?

Thanks in advance for any info you can offer.
What is the ratio of 1st gear in your transmission? Taller tires could hurt you in first gear if your 1st gear ratio is not conducive to the 3.38 rear end you are running.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 157
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 157
52Carl,

The Shop Manual lists first gear at 2.94 to 1.
Attachments
F63618F3-30BC-4175-8BA5-0D10D7A826E4.jpeg (243.27 KB, 291 downloads)


Dan

35 CC Case
38 Chevy Pickup
51 3100 AD
58 3100 Apache Fleetside
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
The change in engine speed will of course vary with axle ratio and tire diameter, but a Muncie 2.20:1 and 2.52:1 (both available in most GM muscle cars) will have very different RPM recovery on the 3-4 shift with the same axle + tire (1-2, 2-3 shifts remain constant).

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,270
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,270
Originally Posted by D B Cooper
52Carl,

The Shop Manual lists first gear at 2.94 to 1.

With that 1st gear ratio and a 3.38 axle ratio and 28 inch tires I am guessing that doing burnouts in the parking lot to impress the chicks isn't happening.
Those same chicks will be even less impressed if you change over to 30.5" tires when you burn your clutch up from milking it, trying to get the truck rolling without stalling.
It all boils down to the chicks. That's why we do all of these mods isn't it?


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 157
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 157
I’ve taken off from a dead stop, on flat ground in 2nd gear with the 338 gear set and my 27” tires. I didn’t do it intentionally, the chick I was trying to impress (my wife of 40 years) was critiquing my driving skills at the time and I got distracted. She wasn’t impressed but it worked out.

If I can do that, I’m pretty sure I should be able to go up an inch or two in tire diameter and still have adequate low gear performance. A 30” tire is probably a bit much.


Dan

35 CC Case
38 Chevy Pickup
51 3100 AD
58 3100 Apache Fleetside
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 58
3
'Bolter
'Bolter
3 Offline
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 58
D B Cooper,

What is the recommended fuel pump for this application? Sorry if i missed it. I went through their inst man on their site also and didnt see it.


"Commonly quoted life advice I dont even try to live by." -Famous Person
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,242
Herder of Cats, Goats, and Sheep (moderator)
Herder of Cats, Goats, and Sheep (moderator)
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,242
Holley sells a whole line of pumps:
https://www.holley.com/products/fue...s_and_filters/fuel_pumps/efi_fuel_pumps/

That said, you can use any generic EFI pump and regulate it to the proper pressure. I ran an Aeromotive inline 255lph pump on my holley system and it worked great.


From the Rocky Mountains?
Check in with the RM Bolters!
HiPo Forum Moderator

1958 Task Force Truck
"Frank" gets a new lease on life
Follow in the DITY Gallery
1959 3200 Task Force
The Ballad of Enkidu
The Saga in the DITY Gallery ~ and the story continues
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 157
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 157
327amc,

Fibonachu is absolutely correct, Holley has a bunch of pumps to choose from. I went with the Holley 12-305, 255LPH, in tank pump. The TB has a regulator and regulates fuel pressure to 58.5 psi. The inline Earls fuel pressure gauge shows 60 psi at the TB inlet.

Are you thinking of installing an in tank pump or an inline pump?

So far so good with my system, no issues.


Dan

35 CC Case
38 Chevy Pickup
51 3100 AD
58 3100 Apache Fleetside
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 593
T
'Bolter
'Bolter
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 593
Looks super space age on that old stovebolt! I bet it runs good too, and removing the tank from right behind the driver is a big boost for safety in the event of accident or upset, heaven forbid.

This debate rages on in the Cadillac forums too-carbs vs EFI. I've owned and driven multiple '77-79 C body DeVilles, (and older ones too, back to the '60s) and the best running one I ever had was the one with the factory multiport EFI. Even that primitive analog ECU system was, in actual use, better all the time. More power, more snap off the line, better MPG especially in mixed driving.. just better all the time.

Regarding TBI and its rapid replacement of carburetors back in the '80s, well.. that's when I became a mechanic, and can I just take a moment to thank the Gods of Chevrolet for doing away with those frankly AWFUL computerized carburetors?! Look me in the eye and try to tell me those bastardized 2bbl half a Quadrajet things were in any way the equal of the throttle body injection systems which soon replaced them. And gave every engine they put it on, 40hp vs that slap in the face to a real QJ of a carb.

I did it the old way-from points, to advance weights and springs, to metering rods and color coded power valve springs and vacuum pulloffs. Got great service from those, but you know what? My next big engine project on my bus-the almost last carbureted vehicle in my fleet-will allow me to tune it all with my tablet. If they drop the bomb and the EMP takes out all the computers, I'll still know how to make a rig roll.. but until that day, I'm ready for the modern way. Even on a pre-CAD engine design.


1965 C60 school bus | 1967 GMC 6500 school bus
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 77
T
'Bolter
'Bolter
T Offline
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 77
Hi - D B , would you have any of the "iceing - up issues" , yet . Just asking, and I like the way you're 'Thinking' .. . . . . keep going, we're all in "learning Mode" .

Thanks , jim

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,677
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,677
Originally Posted by D B Cooper
52Carl's real world experience with a tire diameter change is what I'm more interested in.

Anybody out there have a Task Force truck with a 235, three speed transmission, 338 gears and 30" tires? How does the truck perform with that tall of tire? What kind of RPMs are you turning at 60 MPH on a flat road? What's your average MPG?

Thanks in advance for any info you can offer.

I recently swapped rears in my 1951 and accidentally ended up with a 3.38. I was concerned that I’d be needing to slip the clutch from a takeoff. Can’t really say that there’s much difference there from the 3.90 it replaced. I have 215/85r16 tires. They are 30.5” tall.

Last edited by klhansen; 11/26/2024 4:25 AM. Reason: fixed weird characters

1951 3100
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0