The casting number that would be more helpful for engine ID is located on the passenger's side of the engine block near the fuel pump, down close to the oil pan. The stamped number near the distributor doesn't look like it's got the letter/number codes that are usually used to identify a vehicle application. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Clean the oil off the machined pad near the distributor. You may have to take a piece of sandpaper and clean the rust and paint off to see if there is more of the stamp. Notice in the attached picture you can see a series of numbers but barely make out "T54".
"Adding CFM to a truck will only help at engine speeds you don't want to use." "I found there was nothing to gain beyond 400 CFM."
I went to the car wash and knocked a little crud off everything. Magically a few more digits came out on my engine. The pad below the distributor had this: 0304213T54Z. Is this a replacement or original motor?
1953 Chevy 3100 I have recreated my Dad's old work truck with a 5 window. Photos
Where is the casting date on the head located? Also, does this engine have hydraulic lifters. I would like to set the valves hot. What are the settings?
Last edited by Redbird; 08/04/20222:25 PM. Reason: Addition
1953 Chevy 3100 I have recreated my Dad's old work truck with a 5 window. Photos
Redbird, the casting date for the head is under the valve cover, farther toward the rear, and facing the driver's side. The V/C has to come off to see it.
If you have verified that the engine number suffix is T54Z, the Z designates a passenger car 235, originally mated to a standard transmission. That would have a solid lifter camshaft, and the block will not have been drilled at the factory for the oil gallery needed to run hydraulic lifters.
Valve lash for a '54 235 solid lifter passenger car engine was spec'ed at 0.006" intake and 0.016" exhaust.
There is no reason to attempt to adjust valves on a running engine of any kind, 6 cylinder, V8, or any other style, solid or hydraulic lifters. If the engine has solid lifters, get it warmed up, shut it down, and use the companion cylinder method of establishing top dead center on each compression stroke. All 12 valves can be set with two turns of the engine and they'll be accurate- - - -no mess, and it's done right the first time. Adjustable hydraulic lifters are set cold, with the engine stopped, by anyone who understands basic tuning procedures. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
First, no, the oiling is just a light drip when the engine is running. There is very little oil pressure to the rockers in a '54 235. Just enough oiling to keep things wet, so not at all like an SBC. Choice is to set the valve clearances with engine off, paying attention to the where in the rotation the engine is while working through each valve, so that it's clear when the lifter is on the low portion of its cam.
If you go to the forum's Tech Tips and scroll down to the section labelled Engine, you will find this tip on valve adjustment that explains the procedure: Valve Adjustment. This is my preferred method, FWIW.
BTW, I strongly recommend you browse through the forum's tech tips, as you will find many answers to your questions, electrical, mechanical, body... lots of good info.
Or, you can set the valves with the engine running, using feeler gauges. No clips needed (and nothing to clip them to!). Sort of takes three hands, but with practice it's a fine way to set the valves, just not my preferred method. And, the procedure is not like a typical hydraulic lifter SBC. This engine has solid lifters.
To your earlier question, the T54Z is a passenger car "Blue Flame" 235, originally mated to a standard transmission, and rated at 115HP.
Thank you guys for all your help. I am trying to get used to the forum format. The Corvette Forum and TriFive Forum are a lot different. I will try to get the valves done this week. I have already ordered parts from Rock Auto & Classic Parts USA.
1953 Chevy 3100 I have recreated my Dad's old work truck with a 5 window. Photos
Stovebolts have a nasty habit of wearing a dimple in the tips of the rocker arms where they contact the valve stems. That usually results in a noisy valve train because the true clearance can't be set with a feeler gauge, or a chewed-up feeler gauge if it's inserted between the rocker and the valve with the engine running. Some valve grinding machines have an accessory designed to reface rocker arms, but there's a lot of controversy about how accurate a radius can be done that way. In my decidedly biased opinion, a smooth rocker tip is better than one with a big hole in it regardless of how technically accurate it might be. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Stovebolts have a nasty habit of wearing a dimple in the tips of the rocker arms where they contact the valve stems. That usually results in a noisy valve train because the true clearance can't be set with a feeler gauge, or a chewed-up feeler gauge if it's inserted between the rocker and the valve with the engine running. Some valve grinding machines have an accessory designed to reface rocker arms, but there's a lot of controversy about how accurate a radius can be done that way. In my decidedly biased opinion, a smooth rocker tip is better than one with a big hole in it regardless of how technically accurate it might be. Jerry
I have had good results by using a bench grinder with a very fine grit wheel with a steady hand, keeping the rocker surface aligned with the wheel, and rolled the rocker as best as I could to match the curved surface. I checked progress after every pass. The nice thing was, the divot in the rocker arm followed the same radius as the original unworn surface, so all I had to do was roll the rocker arm and remove metal so that, as it went away, its contour matched that of the divot until there was only a minute amount of the divot remaining. I then switched to cloth polishing wheel loaded with jeweler's rouge until the divot was gone.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission