The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (Bill Hanlon, Bogart's Truck, TexasA&M48Truck, Donf, 2 invisible), 87 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,131
Posts1,056,369
Members48,441
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1432030 12/02/2021 4:09 AM
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 5
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 5
So I've acquired my grandfathers 1953 pickup. I believe it is a 1 ton, it has a 9ft. bed and the load rating on the driverside door post says 8800lbs. The motor is in unknown condition, supposedly drove into to the shed under its own power where its been parked for at least the last 35 - 40 years. There's 92,000 on the odometer. I'm sure it lived a hard life being a farm truck pulling heavy silage wagons and who knows what else. So the question is, is it worth putting any work at all into this motor? I've seen a fair amount of info about people putting a later model engine in these pickups for a little better reliability. The goal is mainly to get the pickup running decent and maybe do a little light work with it just for fun. My grandpa would also be tickled to see it run and drive again!! The casting number on the passenger side of the block is 3835849 so according to my research that makes it the 216 I believe..
Thanks in advance!

Last edited by Coleunruh; 12/02/2021 4:11 AM. Reason: Added info
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 19
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 19
Congratulations on your acquisition. I like the look and practicality of a 9 foot bed. If that is the original engine, it has Babbitt rod bearings making it more expensive to rebuild. That being said l would prefer having an original engine. If you can replace it for less cost than a rebuild then I'd do it but I'd keep the original on a shelf. What is the number stamped on the ledge to the left of the distributor?

Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 5
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 5
Looks like BJCA 427300? Pretty difficult to read.
Attachments
20211202_075604.jpg (233.33 KB, 139 downloads)

Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 19
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 19
That code leaves me totally lost, perhaps someone else can decipher it. I believe you are correct and it is a 1953 or older 218. I would try to get it running. My 53 3600 had sat since 85 and runs great. You may get lucky too. With 4 feet of rubber hose you can bypass the tank and draw your gas from a can in the bed while cleaning or replacing the gas tank. My tank was filled with about a gallon of rust and shellac.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Originally Posted by Coleunruh
Looks like BJCA 427300? Pretty difficult to read.
BJCA Engine Serial Number = 1951 216.5 truck engine assembled in Flint, MI - with RPO 270, Heavy Duty Clutch

427300-1000 = 426300th engine at that engine assembly plant that year

Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 5
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 5
Well thanks for the info guys! Maybe I'll try and fire it up and see how it runs. I'll have to get a new valve cover gasket, I couldn't resist taking a look and when I took the it off of course the original crumbled to pieces! Yes I'll definitely bypass the original tank for now, looks pretty crusty in there.

Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,450
F
'Bolter
'Bolter
F Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,450
Coleunruh Would give that 216 a chance it may be good,one came to me stuck in 82,soaked it limbered it up still is fine today. If the shaft is round you can adjust the shims-just do one at a time-and you will have a durable engine. Most of those got ruined when they rodded it too hard in mud holes,once you damage the dippers and pan it's tuffer to fix hard to find parts today !!


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0