Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
2 members (gswbbc, Gray_Ghost),
50
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,035 Posts1,055,446 Members48,422 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 576 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 576 | anybody running them?would you do it again if you did it over?i know you can get quiet versions ,but does or did the noise get on your nerves after awhile? just trying to make a decision and appreciate your opinions......dave 1949 Chevrolet 3100 "When this thing hits 88 miles an hour, you're going to see some serious sh%t." -Doc Brown
| | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 33 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 33 | I have one in my Chevelle. It is a Pete Jackson "noisy" one for a small block. I haven't had any problems with it, but it is also basically a street legal drag car. I kind of like the sound of it, but the car also has 11:1 compression and 3" exhaust. So, you really don't hear it too much. I don't know that there is enough advantage over a double roller chain to justify the cost difference on a more stock engine. I have built several other "mild" engines since the one I put in the Chevelle and have just used chains on them. I'm not sure if any of that rambling helps you in your decision. Jeff | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 147 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2005 Posts: 147 | I always thought of them as a poor mans blower. Or the sound of a bad alternator.
I would much rather listen to a high compression engine with solid lifters.
my 2cents. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 Master Gabster | | Master Gabster Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 | Sounds more like a cash register opening up. 
~Jim
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 576 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 576 | me too jeff,i like the sound also, really not lookin for an advantage over chains just noise.finaly made a decision to not run a bigger cam so i thought this might help to take the sting out of that.....dave 1949 Chevrolet 3100 "When this thing hits 88 miles an hour, you're going to see some serious sh%t." -Doc Brown
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 21 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 21 | i bought one of the 54 dollar quiet ones from ebay,ill have it in the ol truck runnin very soon!!!!!! | | | | | Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 31 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 31 | Dave, I too had a Pete Jackson gear drive in my 72 Chevelle. I decided to put it in when I re-built the motor and at first I loved it. However, its been 2 years since I rebuilt the motor and I've decided to pull the thing out this winter. Yeah, it sounds cool for awhile, but personally it got to be a pain in the ***. The gear drive was so loud I couldn't hear any other aspects of the motor or the dual exhaust I put on it, so I suppose it's a bit of a craps shoot. Then again, that's just my preference. Hope this helps. -Jake | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | Noise is a form of wasted energy, like heat in the radiator.
A completely efficient engine would make no sound, need no radiator, and have cool exhaust. Then you know that every bit of energy in the fuel is put to work moving the truck, or what ever.
So, if you think a "noisy" gear drive is "high performance", think again, the "quiet" one is actually higher performance....
Anyone have another hair, I have a knife.... :rolleyes:
Grigg | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | Stay with a chain, I have yet to see any peformance guide (either published by GM or aftermarket) that suggests a gear drive for an engien that originally had a chain. None of the Nascar engines run a gear drive.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 | Originally posted by LONGBOX55: None of the Nascar engines run a gear drive. Because the metal to metal friction between the gears of a gear drive don't provide enough give for a chromemoly crank. Remember that even though a chromemoly crank is stronger the a cast or factory Chevy forged crank, it is also more brittle. I will choolse to use a chain and not risk snapping the end off or cracking my crank. The guys that are making lots of HP will even opt for a belt system over a true roller chain. I figure if a Nascar engine (and sprint car) will live with chain, then so will my 4340 crank. So like Longbox55 suggest, stay with a chain.
Admin for Turbobuick.com 87 GN, and new toy: 1955 Chevy 3200 pickup, soon to have: 383, Cola crank, Childs/Albert 6 inch rods, Brownfield heads, 10:1 KB hypers, CompCam 284 Extreme Energy, Tilton Plate transmission realignment and built Turbo400.
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 Master Gabster | | Master Gabster Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 4,983 | If noise is what is wanted a better idea would be to drop your mufflers and run straight pipes. 
~Jim
| | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats | | Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 | If noise is what is wanted a better idea would be to drop your mufflers and run straight pipes.  Or go with a Blower if that is the sound you want Big-ol 671 or even a 471 sitting on top of the engine.
The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | If noise is what you want... Don't stop with just the 4-71 or 6-71 blower, go ahead and install the whole engine.
A Detroit Diesel is the most efficient device for turning #2 Diesel fuel into noise.
Also the only engines mentioned in the bible: "...and the earth was inhabited by screaming monsters..."
The Detroit that makes the most noise is a 6V53, no turbo, straight two lobed blower rotors, and 2,800 rpm goverened....
Grigg | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | I don't know about that. We had a 6-71 in the Deisel class workshop when I was in college, 5" x 4' stack, no muffler. They could hear that thing run clear across the campus when we ran it up against the governor (3200 rpm). The thing sounded like a Top Feuller leaving the line.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | I don't recall what series it was, i do know it came out of a '63 GMC cement truck, we had the Allison 6 speed auto that came with it, too.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | Ahh, it was an n series then, no turbo.
Bill Burmeister | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | N is a series after the standard early Detroit's, they have newer pistons, liners, and injectors. The injectors are N type, for needle valve, the valve in the tip.
N is usually understood as "Naturalized", or non turbo, but it's more complicated than just that.
An N engine sounds different than an older engine, or one with older injectors.
A turbo quiets an engine.
Grigg | | |
| |