The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (Wally / Montana, Otto Skorzeny, Hotrod Lincoln, Opelika Tom, FishinToms53, Nick in Manitou), 91 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,089
Posts1,056,437
Members48,443
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1390572 12/31/2020 3:31 AM
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 6
H
'Bolter
'Bolter
H Offline
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 6
I have a 1948 Chevy 3100 truck that is 95% stock / original. I changed to 12v system, upgraded mater cylinder to dual bowl and changed ring and pinion from the 4:10 to 3:55. Other than these, all original / restored. My question is; should the 216 engine bite the dust, what replacement would the members suggest? I was thinking a late model full pressure 235.

Thanks

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Is the engine dependable and strong enough to get you where/when you need to drive it?
If yes, why not just leave is as it is?
95% original is quite rare.

While you are enjoying your truck, get a 1954-63 235 (or 261) and rebuild it and safely/dryly store it.
A 1954/1955st truck engine would be the easiest to to swap in.

Almost all 1954 and later (high pressure) truck 235's had mechanical lifters.

1954 and later car 235s would be the next choice; however, they would have hydraulic lifters. Almost no truck engines had hydraulic lifters. Corvette 235s had mechanical lifters.

Some later car/truck engines have different motor mounts, but this is not an insurmountable reality (I will not call it a problem).

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,441
Bolter
Bolter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,441
Posting the same question in two different forums is not proper Stovebolt etiquette. Your post in GTT was deleted by the Moderator.


Martin
'62 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed (Restomod in progress)
'47 Chevy 3100 5 Window (long term project)
‘65 Chevy Biscayne (Emily)
‘39 Dodge Business Coupe (Clarence)
“I fought the law and the law won" now I are a retired one!
Support those brave men/women who stand the "Thin Blue Line"! Hug a cop!
USAF 1965-1969 Weather Observation Tech (I got paid to look at the clouds)

Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 6
H
'Bolter
'Bolter
H Offline
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 6
I am new so my apologies. I did enter it in General truck first then I found the Engine forum. I thought I had successfully deleted the General truck forum, evidently not...

Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 6
H
'Bolter
'Bolter
H Offline
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 6
The 216 in my truck runs like a top so not planning on changing it just to change it. I was just curious what my options might be if something did happen. I was also wanting to have the knowledge that if I came across something like a 235 or 261 for sale I might want to pick up strictly as a backup.

Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,450
F
'Bolter
'Bolter
F Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,450
Haney Nothing wrong with the 216 most of those that got damaged were hurt from rocking the truck in a mud hole (hung up) It would damage the rod dippers. Then the loose dipper would demolish the pan (oil channels) . If they stopped right away a good mechanic could still fix it. That forged crankshaft is pretty tough !

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,828
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Online: Content
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,828
It's possible to modernize the 216 and still keep it looking original, but either rebuilding the spray-oiler engine or modernizing the internals can get pretty expensive. Going with a slightly newer engine such as a 1954-62 235 is probably the simplest upgrade, as long as you don't mind losing the "original" look of the 216 engine. I'm currently working on a couple of projects that look like an original 216, but have either 235 or 258 cubic inches and a crankshaft that lubes the connecting rods internally, has a bigger oil pump, a hotter camshaft, and a leakproof rear main bearing seal. About the only thing "original" on those engines is the block and the cylinder head.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0