The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
9 members (GMCJammer51, Materman, Lightholder's Dad, Ridgeback, Brian Moore, tclederman, jupitor, treegrower, 1 invisible), 189 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,080
Posts1,055,952
Members48,430
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1390370 12/30/2020 1:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 14
D
New Guy
New Guy
D Offline
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 14
I'm sure I'm gonna hear some good and bad. So how do you like the 47-53 trucks slammed to the ground big motors ? or all original ? give me your answer and explain why. For me I like the airbag lowered but i still like the look of the original body not much custom work. Thanks guys and HAPPY NEW YEAR

Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 788
I am not a purist ; my '54 3100 is not at all original.

Having said (admitted) that , in answer to your question -
"Slammed to the ground" is a look I have no use for. It looks sad and dysfunctional to me.

Horrible thing to do to a truck.

Eye of the beholder...

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,780
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,780
The really butt-ugly ones have the front bumper almost dragging the ground and the rear close to original ride height. They remind me of a floppy-eared blue tick hound that's just come out on the losing end of a close encounter with a skunk!
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,476
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,476
To me it depends on what condition and how original the truck is. I wouldn’t want to destroy an unmolested 60-70 year old original truck in decent shape. Once you slam it you can’t go back to original.

Now if the truck has been “worked” on by so called mechanics that own a pipe wrench and BFH with that “Git-R-Done” attitude, then I’m all for it.


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,407
J
Former Workshop Owner
Former Workshop Owner
J Online: Content
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,407
I've never been keen on notching a frame and dropping them to the ground. I just never liked the look (cars or trucks). I wonder what percentage of them get finished.

I am not a purist, just have never been into low riders, slammed or whatever else you call it. Not my cup of tea.

John.

Last edited by J Lucas; 12/30/2020 3:48 AM.

~ J Lucas
2006 GMC Envoy 4.2 I6
2023 Ram 2500/Cumins 6.7 I6
2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee (Wife’s)
2002 Silverado 2500 Gas 6.0
1941 Chevy 1/2-Ton
1942 Chevy 1.5-Ton SWB
In the Gallery
My Flicker Photos!
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,904
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Online: Content
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,904
Do whatever makes you happy. I never wanted a brand new 1948 truck but I never wanted to morph what I have into something else. I just want to do what a rancher along the Rocky Mountain Front would do to keep his truck going.

Again, do what you want. You'll find plenty of fans!

Last edited by Wally / Montana; 12/30/2020 4:30 AM.

1948 3/4-Ton 5-Window Flatbed Chevrolet

34 Years. Now with a '61 261, 848 head, Rochester Monojet carb, SM420 4-speed, 4.10 rear, dual reservoir MC, Bendix up front, 235/85R16 tires, 12-volt w/alternator, electric wipers and a modern radio in the glove box.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,386
T
Crusty Old Sarge
Crusty Old Sarge
T Offline
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,386
For me it's kind of two sided, I love a true original truck, I also can appreciate a "GOOD" modified truck. I don't really care for the "Air Bag" suspension or the "C" notched frames, I have seen to many hack job's doing this to a truck.

That being said is my 59' stock .. No, but it also isn't chopped up or butchered. I still have a solid axel up front and leaf's in the rear, it's lowered but not to the point of "Jerry's" interpretation. I have a V8 and 4 speed , not an LS (I do like Barnfind's truck) but the truck didn't have the Stovebolt when it came to me. The point is we all have our idea of what a truck should be, do we like them all .. No, but you can enjoy a well thought out build.


~ Craig
1958 Viking 4400
"The Book of Thor"
Read the story in the DITY
1960 Chevrolet C10
"A Family Heirloom"
Follow the story in the DITY Gallery
'59 Apache 31, 327 V8 (0.030 over), Muncie M20 4 Speed, GM 10 Bolt Rear... long term project (30 years and counting)

If you don't like driving yourTruck, you won't drive yourTruck..| Living life in the SLOW lane
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,440
Bolter
Bolter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,440
I like the look of a tastefully lowered pickup. Maybe a couple of inches is plenty. Would I do that to a nice unmolested truck that runs and drives as intended? No! A truck drug out of a locust grove out in the south 40 after 30-50 years of acquiring patina, heck yes! As always, it’s yours do what YOU want.


Martin
'62 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed (Restomod in progress)
'47 Chevy 3100 5 Window (long term project)
‘65 Chevy Biscayne (Emily)
‘39 Dodge Business Coupe (Clarence)
“I fought the law and the law won" now I are a retired one!
Support those brave men/women who stand the "Thin Blue Line"! Hug a cop!
USAF 1965-1969 Weather Observation Tech (I got paid to look at the clouds)

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,660
B
Curmudgeon
Curmudgeon
B Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,660
This is an over-exaggeration, but suppose you want "the works". Today you spend mega bucks on the latest hi-tech engine, transmission, suspension, modern interior, huge chrome rims with 1" high rubber tires with fantastic body paint and chrome that will blind. Fast forward 10 years. Your dream car has lost public desirability because the ride is too harsh, doesn't have the latest hi-tech EV motor, autopilot, collision avoidance system, computerized steering, 3D entertainment system etc.

Unless you have money to burn, consider the return on your investment before you shuck out the $$$. I venture to say that there are tens of thousands hot rod classis cars that spent most of their lives sitting in a home garage, beach house or storage facility. The owner's lose interest and it goes up on an auction block or car lot. Most of the money you have spent goes in someone else's pocket.

There is another aspect. The parts that are removed may end up in the junk pile for the metal recyclers to shred and melt down. These pieces of history will be gone forever.

This forum is about "old work trucks" that today happen to be collectible. To me it's all about the noise, slight aroma of burning oil and the satisfaction you get from trying to keep a 60 year old truck running halfway decent. The on-going challenge. The skinned knuckles and the cursing. The enjoyment of reading Hot Rod Lincoln's witticism's.


"Adding CFM to a truck will only help at engine speeds you don't want to use."
"I found there was nothing to gain beyond 400 CFM."
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 464
O
'Bolter
'Bolter
O Offline
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 464
Not a big fan of the trucks down on the ground and original is to high. Everyone has their likes and dislikes I guess. I have my 49 lowered and it sets level. Not a fan of the California rake either.

Last edited by olezippi; 12/31/2020 1:42 PM.

"If you can't fix it with duct tape it's an electrical problem"
1949 5 Window 3100
Follow in the DITY
Veteran of the USAF
My Website
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,052
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,052
Originally Posted by olezippi
Not a big fan of the trucks down on the ground and original is to high. Everyone has their likes and dislikes I guess. I have my 49 lowered and it sets level. Not a fan of the California rake either.
I agree. The postal truck "squat" isn't very attractive either. dang


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
Lowering to dirt level should be reserved for the lesser makes. Most of them are already ugly.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 678
M
'Bolter
'Bolter
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 678
While I like the look of a slammed truck, I hate the "gimmickyness" of it. It's basically akin to the hydraulic lowrider-hopper cars ("Oh look, my car does tricks!"). I've been in hot-rodding a long time and I've seen lots of fads come and go. Like mullet haircuts, the cooler something was in its hey-day, the more embarrassing it will be after it's time has passed. Someday the slammed look will be regarded as ridiculous as the "high-heel" elevated rear of the 1970s, but a simple static-lowered stance will be classic forever.

My former '50 longbed: low enough to look good, but never scraped anywhere:
Attachments
20161111_151536 (Medium).jpg (122.21 KB, 96 downloads)


1951 Chevy Panel Truck
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,386
T
Crusty Old Sarge
Crusty Old Sarge
T Offline
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,386
Someday the slammed look will be regarded as ridiculous as the "high-heel" elevated rear of the 1970s, but a simple static-lowered stance will be classic forever.

AMEN, a little off the front and a touch off the rear please.


~ Craig
1958 Viking 4400
"The Book of Thor"
Read the story in the DITY
1960 Chevrolet C10
"A Family Heirloom"
Follow the story in the DITY Gallery
'59 Apache 31, 327 V8 (0.030 over), Muncie M20 4 Speed, GM 10 Bolt Rear... long term project (30 years and counting)

If you don't like driving yourTruck, you won't drive yourTruck..| Living life in the SLOW lane
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 559
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 559
When i was 17 I built a nissan hardbody on air bags. Loved that truck. I dragged through a few oil pans, gas tank, front perches. I had sooo much fun in that truck. I still love lowriders. My next truck was a ford superduty that I mildly lifted on 35’s. Love that truck and it was perfect daily driver height and look. Now my 49 GMC I like to look 100% bone stock. Its a personal opinion on what or how you build it. Who cares if anyone else likes it or if some guys say it “devalues” it or whatever. To each his own. Its your truck so build it exactly how you like it. When you go to sell a truck someone somewhere is gonna be in love with it and buy it.


Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0