| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (Hotrod Lincoln),
72
guests, and
0
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,049 Posts1,055,680 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 595 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 595 | guys! lets say you have 2 87' s10's one 2wd,one 4x4.we know that the frames are different from the doors foward. are the frames the same doors back? i know the rearends are different widths but are the frame rails the same.reason i ask is a 52' ad 3100 has 117" wb. so to match that you need a std cad long box s-10 and most s-10's were short box's which the wheelbase is to short. can a guy use the 2wd front frame section with 4x4 rear frame section stretched to correct wheelbase also giving you the correct rear end (4x4) as the 2wd rear is too narrow for AD trucks. FEEDBACK PLEASE!  | | | | | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 164 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 164 | Are the frames different? I thought the only difference was in the front suspension...but I've never measured them. | | | | | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 595 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 595 | | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | Yes, from the doors back, other than the crossmember for the torsion bars, the frames are identical. I don't see why you couldn't splice tham together to make the length you need. Do be advised, though, that if the 4x4 truck is a ZR2, the ride hight is much higher due to the factory lift. Swapping in the 2wd springs is advisable.
Bill Burmeister
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 38 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 38 | | | | | | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 595 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 595 | thanks guys! one of the reasons i asked is the rearend perches, when you put a 4x4 rear into 2wd you have to move the spring perches inward so that they will line up with the springs and that would tell me the 4x4 springs are mounted further apart? i would simply just measure but i don't wan't to drag home the whole blazer if i'm only going to use the rearend. thanks! | | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2006 Posts: 8,351 | The perches will be the same, the extra width of the 4x4 rear is outboard of the springs. The actual reason for the wider rear is because of the way the front is made. In order to use the ifs, it has to be wider than the std 2wd front because of the drive axles. If they were to be shorter to narrow up the front, there would be binding in the cv joints from the limited range of motion. That's also the reason tha front drivers have the wheels offset like they do. The wider rear on the S10 (and the '88-up fullsize) is to compensate for the extra offst required in the front. Std offset wheels will be fine on that axle for what you're doing with it, though.
Bill Burmeister
| | |
|
|
| |
