Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (MickeyP, RoadsScholar, Gdads51, 1955 1 Series, thekid1950, tclederman, klhansen),
117
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,081 Posts1,056,068 Members48,433 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 181 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 181 | Hello again with a few questions re: the modified boosted brakes which I'm installing on my 58 Spartan 80 (I'm using a 'modern' 1970s-80s booster, originally from a medium duty International). I'm having a brain fart: 1) Is there any functional difference between placing my reserve vacuum tank in-line from manifold to booster, as opposed to tee-ing it from a T fitting at the booster vacuum connection (it makes a lot more sense for me to run the main line down the left frame rail, to the booster, then just as it is about to enter the booster, add a T fitting, allowing a line to the reserve tank to cross to the right frame rail where there is room to mount the reserve tank).. 2) in using a reserve tank, is there a necessity of using a second check valve, aside from the one on the firewall above the manifold? 3) would the original 1.5 inch master cyl be sufficient to operate this 'modern' booster? Your ideas and experiences very much appreciated!!
1955 GMC 630, 1959 GMC W660, 1958 Chevy Spartan 80
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 6,214 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 6,214 | That sounds right...out of the manifold to the check valve high on the firewall, then down to a T on the drivers side at the Hydrovac, then out of the T and over to the tank on the passenger side. I think 1/2" copper will do the trick! There could also be a fresh air intake on the Hydrovac that should have an air filter on it or be piped back up to the engine air cleaner to keep dust/dirt out of the Hydrovac piston chamber. Some trucks had what looks like a valve cover breather attached to the inside of the cab either behind the dash on the firewall or behind the seat on the floor. Your existing MC will work fine... Mike B  | | | | | Joined: May 2017 Posts: 330 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2017 Posts: 330 | What Mike said ^, with just one check valve, not two.
Mac :{)
1962 K10 short step side, much modified for rally 1969 T50 fire truck, almost nos, needs a few things
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 181 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 181 | Mike and Mac, many thanks! I am using copper tubing (I'll double check the size, but it's not small).....also I did see the breather on the inside of the firewall, but not sure what size line I should use to connect to it.....and good to know that the original MC will work and that a single check valve is all that's necessary. Thanks again!
1955 GMC 630, 1959 GMC W660, 1958 Chevy Spartan 80
| | | | | Joined: May 2017 Posts: 330 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2017 Posts: 330 | The size of the tubing is important, it needs to flow properly so that the booster reacts quickly to the pedal movements. Just do not downsize it and keep it as short as practical.
Mac :{)
1962 K10 short step side, much modified for rally 1969 T50 fire truck, almost nos, needs a few things
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 181 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 181 | Got it....thanks for the added info!
1955 GMC 630, 1959 GMC W660, 1958 Chevy Spartan 80
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 6,214 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 6,214 | The fresh air tubing/hose should be the same size as the nipple on your Hydrovac...it could be 1/2" or 3/4". My Illustrated Parts Book shows the 1962 trucks used 1/2" steel tubing (if needed I'll dig to confirm '58 is the same), but I think copper will be just fine. Mike B  | | | | | Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 181 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 181 | Good, thanks for the added info!
1955 GMC 630, 1959 GMC W660, 1958 Chevy Spartan 80
| | |
| |