The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (Steelonsteel, EchoBravoSierra, Grandpas_48, Ridgeback, klhansen, TooMany2count), 596 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,780
Posts1,039,291
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#136163 11/26/2006 10:26 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
L
Junior Member
Junior Member
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
I am asking for some free advice from the members.....
I want to replace the 235 in my '58 pickup. I'm torn between a 292 or 350 small block. Jinda want to stay with a 6 to be different. A friend has a complete 25 that he will give me. He thinks that a strong rebuild on it and a 3 angle valve job on my 848 head will be about as good and much less costley then buying a 292 and rebuilding it. I have a ZZ4 crate motor in the street rod so I know what it can do....and cost.
Thanks in advance

#136164 11/26/2006 11:03 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,897
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,897
if you want to be different... stay with a 6 banger.

#136165 11/27/2006 12:06 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
If you are going to drive it much go with the V-8. It was an option in there & looks right at home. They even handle better with a V-8. It weighs less & the weight is further back so it steers easier & drives better. Early V-8,s had stovebolts too.


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
#136166 11/29/2006 1:45 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 237
J
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
J Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 237
As much as I personally like the straight 6, the SBC 350 V8 is a good engine. The 350 parts will be cheaper and easier to find. The engine will be easier to tune (as more people have knowledge on how to tune it).

That being said, straight engines (with multiples of 3 cylinders... i.e. 3, 6, 9, 12, etc..) are inherently balanced engines. V8's are NOT. There is a reason you see them on BIG STRONG tractors, trucks, etc... and not the bent engine counterpart.

I'm currently looking for a 292 to tweak a little and put in my 58. Should not be too difficult to get 300 ft/lb, reliable torque at 3500 rpm. Racers want to talk about HP, but when you want to get work done talk about torque.

Know what kind of engine BMW just spent years of time developing to put in there new HOT sedan... a straight 6. Wonder why? Because they are good engineers, not good ole boy racers.

#136167 11/29/2006 2:49 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,971
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,971
If the six isn't a problem for you why not fix it? If I were going to swap, I would go straight to the small block myself, because of the ease and expense.

#136168 12/05/2006 1:00 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
The 292 would be a cool engine if you score one. I found websites that sell rebuilt 292's for $1200 bucks. Of course, that's a stock rebuild.

350's run so incredibly well and offer the best bang for the buck. But you lose that original look.

In a car show about a year ago, I entered my truck along with several really pristine AD trucks. But mine was the only one with the stovebolt engine. Mine was far from perfect, but it won the people's choice award, despite how beautiful the V8 AD trucks were.

From that, I draw the conclusion that most people prefer the old-fashioned look of the Stovebolt engine.

The 292 would give you that. But I agree with the above, if you plan on driving it a lot or using it for work, the 350 might be the more practical approach.

Bottom line, it's your truck, and your choice.
I'd advise going to a good car show that might have a few different AD trucks on display.


52 GMC 3/4 ton pickup
68 Big Block Vette
68 455 Firebird
#136169 12/05/2006 1:05 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
Here's the link for the 292 crate engines:

http://www.usdieselparts.com/category.cfm?Category=1400&CFID=818845&CFTOKEN=780

And here's another one:

http://www.gmplace.com/engine/gmcgmplacegmc_292lb_6.html

Looks like the prices vary. But for about a grand, that's a nice deal.


52 GMC 3/4 ton pickup
68 Big Block Vette
68 455 Firebird
#136170 12/05/2006 1:24 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29
Hey guys I also have got intrest in the 292. Just bought two salvage engines complete. Don't know much about them but in conversations with Tom Langdon of Langdons stovebolt its not wise to buy a engine if you don't have the brackets to go on it.

I started to buy long block re-man and I could not find any hardware to complete.....Just a thought.

#136171 12/05/2006 3:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
P
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
Do the 350. The 6 is OK, but not as a daily driver. Personally i cant see driving a 216 because i would blow it up from pushing it too hard-and then what good is it to anyone? If i can i am going to drive the stovebolt every day and never buy a new truck or car again-therefore it needs to be able to be taken on open freeways and open roads. My truck(s) are not original anyhoo and never will be so a v-6 or a small 8 is appropriate.
That vortech v-6 in the chevy trailblazer LTZ is impressive to say the least. has the power of a 350 and drives like it never gets wore down. We are approaching 100,000 miles on it and it hasnt slowed yet-hauls a load too. Would be cool to score one of those and put em in a stovebolt...

#136172 12/05/2006 11:41 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,031
C
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
C Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,031
The 250's can rev higher than the 292's.
the 292's have more torque.

i put a 292 in my 3104
got it at the junk yard for $600 and it was completely rebuilt w/ 600 miles... out of a wrecked 67 truck

we love it
500 edelbrock, clifford, langton headers, dual to single exhaust, hei, T5, 12 bolt,


Jim & Caroline
The highway is for gamblers, better use your good sense."
Gooday-that's my 1¢ answer due to the lousy economy ~ cause I ain't got - no . mo . doe

Every Shaver | Now Can Snore | Six More Minutes | Than Before ... | Half A Pound for Half a Dollar | Spread On Thin | Above the Collar || BURMA-SHAVE
#136173 12/06/2006 1:37 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 595
1
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
1 Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 595
the 292 is a great update. make sure when you buy the motor if you don't have access to casting number id look at the mounting area on block. 194,230,250 blocks have their mounts in parallel like 350's. 292's are offset,the passenger side is further forward. this will keep you from buying the wrong motor.fastest way i know of for 292 id. don't let peer pressure sway you!

#136174 12/06/2006 12:33 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 262
P
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
P Offline
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 262
I had a 250 in my last '49. Drove it every day, everywhere. Of course, I had an automatic and high gear rearend. I could cruise the freeways and keep up with the V-8 guys (as long as they didn't punch it!). Did it that way 'cause I liked the original look, but wanted something easier to get parts for. Also I was given 2 250's. For $150 worth of machine work, I had a running engine.


My truck: She may not be the prettiest girl at the dance, but she's all mine!
#136175 12/06/2006 8:04 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,029
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,029
Unless I misunderstood IMS's original post, you can't put your 848 head on a 250 C.I. engine, but it goes great with a 261.

#136176 12/06/2006 8:13 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 103
Offline
'Bolter
'Bolter
Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 103
Gee, seems like the V-8 guys have all the pro's. NOT!!! Go here: http://www.customdesignperformance.com/leo/leo.html I have a 55 GMC dump truck with the never-ending 302. Even after trying to install a tree where the radiator should be, it still runs flawlessly. (NEVER trust your park brake, ALWAYS chock your wheels!!)


My 1955 GMC 450 Dump Truck
In the Stovebolt Gallery
Elderly Iron
"Performance" is the pursuit of a toy that won't break.
#136177 12/06/2006 8:38 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,031
C
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
C Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,031
Quote
fastest way i know of for 292 id.
The 292's have two 6'' high side valve covers


Jim & Caroline
The highway is for gamblers, better use your good sense."
Gooday-that's my 1¢ answer due to the lousy economy ~ cause I ain't got - no . mo . doe

Every Shaver | Now Can Snore | Six More Minutes | Than Before ... | Half A Pound for Half a Dollar | Spread On Thin | Above the Collar || BURMA-SHAVE
#136178 12/07/2006 1:52 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
L
Junior Member
Junior Member
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
made the decision. it now has a 1996 LT1 with 4L60 trans and all is in and running.....perfectly

#136179 12/07/2006 10:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,067
Good choice.


52 GMC 3/4 ton pickup
68 Big Block Vette
68 455 Firebird
#136180 12/08/2006 4:23 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,374
Moderator - The Electrical Bay
Moderator - The Electrical Bay
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,374
283 or 327... classic look and good HP


Another quality post.
Real Trucks Rattle
HELP! The Paranoids are after me!

Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.053s Queries: 13 (0.049s) Memory: 0.6746 MB (Peak: 0.7934 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 19:42:08 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS