Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
8 members (SammyC60, TUTS 59, 52Carl, Mike Roache, TooMany2count, Hawkman, Otto Skorzeny, 1 invisible),
101
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,101 Posts1,056,518 Members48,448 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 44 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 44 | question 1- can you use an 82-93 S10 frame under a 47 1/2 ton? if so how much work has to be done to do so? :confused: 2- if so should you use a short,long, or a extended cabe frame 3-how much can you lower the suspension without major fabrications and alterations if you can use an S10.
41 Chev 2dr coupe 51 3100 w/a 261 11 Camaro RS ragtop
| | | | | Joined: Aug 2002 Posts: 141 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2002 Posts: 141 | no vote butI have an s-10 rear bumper not bolted to trk yet but I dont have to do any mod. just provide flat steel for bumper brackets | | | | | Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 398 Member | | Member Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 398 | Allan, welcome to The Stovebolt Pages. I couldn't vote, pewter wouldn't let me in. On to your topic. If you had taken a quick peek at my post "frame swappin'" a little further down the Shop, you would have found this link: http://www.commerce.usask.ca/staff/hipkin/burb/ This guy has done the number with a combination of S-10 Blazer 4WD front chassis and S-10 Pickup longbox rear chassis. You can see for yourself by checking out his site that this is not a task for the faint of heart. There is a WHOLE PILE of fabrication work necessary to fit everything together. The longbox S-10 chassis seems to be the rails of choice for this swap, as the wheelbase is similar to the half ton AD. The S-10 front track width is approximately correct, however the rear axle is way too narrow-not "tub it" narrow, just narrow enough to sink the wheels too far into the wheelwells. A mid to late seventies Camaro or Firebird rear axle swap would work pretty O.K. to get you the right width. Many folks here would scorn you for a fool for attempting this-I'm not one of them. I think this might be an O.K. way to save an old truck with rusted out floorboards, myself. But if your truck is solid, you are probably better off saving up for the traditional Mustang II crossmember and lowered leafs for the rear. In the long run, what may seem like a cheap way to upgrade can turn into a very expensive nightmare. Just my $.02 Best of Luck, whatever you decide, Allan. Regards, Wannabe 
"Don't expect anything and you'll never be disappointed"
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 5,226 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 5,226 | As with any swap, you need to know what you can do your self as far as welding and fabricating.
The question is why do it? Does it really need to be changed? If the frame is usable, change only the springs and axles. This will save countless hours of work. What does the S-10 have that yours don't? It all can be made to fit the original frame that fits the truck in all the right places. Box in the original if you want it stiff. Check out the many links on this site for vender information. Go buy a Street Rodder Magazine, they are all about lowered, chopped, slammed, shaved etc..... The less drastic work you do, the faster you get to drive!! Most of all, have fun. If that stops happening, you might be on the wrong road. Joe | | | | | Joined: May 2001 Posts: 2 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: May 2001 Posts: 2 | why on earth would u want an s-10 frame? | | | | | Joined: Jun 2002 Posts: 96 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2002 Posts: 96 | Heres a web page that approaches it from scratch built.
Send David Hicks home - now! "Better to be wrong and kill no one then right with mass graves" Albert Camus
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 | Someone here has done it, I am thinking Boyo. :confused: Said the biggest pain was converting the floor mount clutch and brake, the S-10 is firewall mount. Concensus was that it was far more effort than it was worth.
Fred 52 3600 69 C-10
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 244 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2002 Posts: 244 | Try this:http://www.usbodysource.com/Install%2047%20chevy.htm | | | | | Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 2 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 2 | Hey pal, I own an S-10. Let me tell you first hand having experience with other pickup's that this is not, I repeat not the suspension you want under your rig! My previous vehicle was ... get this, a Dodge Dakota, and let me say the Dakota was and is a far superior street truck. Not to mention the Dodges rack and pinion, and far healthier 3rd member. Surely the Dakota frame would be something to look into. Just my opinion. | | |
| |