The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (sron48, J Lucas, Hotrod Lincoln, klhansen, Peggy M, 1 invisible), 453 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,777
Posts1,039,267
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1297682 02/05/2019 7:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
Looking for recommendations on what to do with rebuilding my brake system. Keep stock or ????
I'll be running the 216 for a spell once I get it up and running but I'm contemplating dropping a small block V8 later on down the road.

Thanks in advance for any/all input.

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,214
V
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
V Offline
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,214
Are you driving your truck now or is it close to running with the 216 or are you in the middle of restoring it?

Stock brakes are fine for a stock 216 but not sufficient for higher powered engines..

If you're currently driving it redoing the stock brakes is fine.

If you're restoring it and have designs on repowering it, now would be the good time to upgrade the brakes to a dual master cylinder and disc's up front. Adding a power booster will make it stop like a modern vehicle.

Good luck

Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
Subscribing as I'm curious as well.


1953 Canadian GMC 9314 w/ (factory) Chevy 235
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
Not currently driving it. I'm going to completely replace the entire brake system and looking to buy everything now. I've been contemplating disc front wheels but the thought of cost savings keeping it as stock is always on my mind.

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,214
V
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
V Offline
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,214
You don't have to go with disc's right off the bat, you could add them later. When it comes to the brakes don't cut corners, do them right.
There are dual reservoir master cyl kits available that bolt up where the OEM master cyl does. You could then plumb your truck for separate front and back brake circuits which would give you alittle better stopping power with your drum/shoe brakes.
Adding disc's is a pretty steep expense whether you do it upfront or afterwards. They do provide better stopping power tho....

Good luck
Dave

Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
Thank you for your thoughts on this. I reckon should the day ever come I go V-8, I'll be ready for it.

Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
Originally Posted by Volfandt
You don't have to go with disc's right off the bat, you could add them later. When it comes to the brakes don't cut corners, do them right.
There are dual reservoir master cyl kits available that bolt up where the OEM master cyl does. You could then plumb your truck for separate front and back brake circuits which would give you alittle better stopping power with your drum/shoe brakes.
Adding disc's is a pretty steep expense whether you do it upfront or afterwards. They do provide better stopping power tho....

Good luck
Dave

I'm currently looking at the dual master cylinder Brothers Trucks offers.


1953 Canadian GMC 9314 w/ (factory) Chevy 235
Lindsey #1298330 02/10/2019 3:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
Lindsey,

Was that master cylinder a dual reservoir for front and rear drum brakes with manual transmission? All the ones I seem to locate for drum brakes are for automatic transmissions.

Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
I’ll have a look for the link it was non boosted, just adds the dual feature. I find the boosted master cylinders are advertised for autos as the floor mounted booster interferes with the stock trans crossmember.


1953 Canadian GMC 9314 w/ (factory) Chevy 235
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
https://www.brotherstrucks.com/Manual-Master-Cylinder-Conversions/products/1278/

Looks like you add the proportioning valve for disc brakes.


1953 Canadian GMC 9314 w/ (factory) Chevy 235
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214


1953 Canadian GMC 9314 w/ (factory) Chevy 235
Lindsey #1298502 02/11/2019 3:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
Thanks Lindsey,

I did some parts researching and pricing and have decided to go front disc / rear drum. With that upgrade and replacing everything else in the system (not including the drums themselves) it looks like I can do it for just under $2k. I can live with that and knowing my family and I will be safe going down the road!

Tony AK49 #1298555 02/11/2019 10:49 PM
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
Awesome. Are you going boosted or just adding discs?


1953 Canadian GMC 9314 w/ (factory) Chevy 235
Lindsey #1298636 02/12/2019 3:23 PM
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
Budget says non-boosted for now. With the brakes checked off on my list, steering controls (front end) is next.

Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
I’m thinking the same and upgrade to power brakes when/if we change out the transmission.


1953 Canadian GMC 9314 w/ (factory) Chevy 235
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
Engine, tranny, rear end after the front end for me then electrical or body work after that. Gotta have a plan and gotta have short term goals to achieve the ultimate goal/vision!

Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
I’ve got most that done now. Axle shafts were scored and I just found decent used ones. Just have rubber brake components and tie rod to do and it’s essentially ready for the road. It’s pretty much stock and will start updating, not restoring, over time.


1953 Canadian GMC 9314 w/ (factory) Chevy 235
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
Nice! When I get to digging into mine, I’ll lean on you for advice, tips and things to look out for.

Lindsey #1299966 02/21/2019 3:50 AM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 731
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 731
Thanks for that link. Just received the adapter bracket and it seems very solid and durable. Nice anodized 1/4" thick, $88 shipped.

Plan to start converting my '52 3100 single-res master tomorrow. Will remain drum/drum, under the floor. Ordered the dual master listed for '67 C10 drum/drum from Rockauto, was approx $50 shipped.

Hope it fits oriented as shown in picture with master "inside" the bracket so to speak, rubber boot facing forward as original.
If all goes well I'll post an update asap!
Attachments
IMG_0577.jpeg (272.35 KB, 63 downloads)


Matthew 6:33

1952 Chevy 1/2-ton 3100
Late '55 235/SM420/torque tube 3.55
Dalton Highway survivor (using original 216)
www.truckwithaheart.com
Skooter #1300018 02/21/2019 3:49 PM
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 35
Skooter, did you get a portioning valve or was it not required?

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,442
Bolter
Bolter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,442
Drum, drum no proportioning valve needed. I just did it to my ‘62 and added power assist.


Martin
'62 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed (Restomod in progress)
'47 Chevy 3100 5 Window (long term project)
‘65 Chevy Biscayne (Emily)
‘39 Dodge Business Coupe (Clarence)
“I fought the law and the law won" now I are a retired one!
Support those brave men/women who stand the "Thin Blue Line"! Hug a cop!
USAF 1965-1969 Weather Observation Tech (I got paid to look at the clouds)

Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 731
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 731
Originally Posted by Justhorsenround
Drum, drum no proportioning valve needed. I just did it to my ‘62 and added power assist.
Nope, no prop valve. I learned that after reading a bunch of the internets. grin thumbs_up


Matthew 6:33

1952 Chevy 1/2-ton 3100
Late '55 235/SM420/torque tube 3.55
Dalton Highway survivor (using original 216)
www.truckwithaheart.com
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 731
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 731
Is there any reason to not use 3/16 brake lines coming out of both MC ports? Tighter bend will give an inch more side clearance to transmission, and the SM420 weighs 42,000 lbs so removal even with a cherry picker one wrong sway could damage stuff. Clearance space is good. thumbs_up Originally there's a 1/4 line going across bellhousing crossmember to passenger side (RF and both rear brakes), so I'd prefer 1/4 if I had my druthers but space is critical.

FYI, picture shows MC to rear trans support crossmember clearance with the Performance Online setup.
Attachments
IMG_0818.JPEG (260.39 KB, 118 downloads)


Matthew 6:33

1952 Chevy 1/2-ton 3100
Late '55 235/SM420/torque tube 3.55
Dalton Highway survivor (using original 216)
www.truckwithaheart.com
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 731
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 731
Attached pic looks straight up from floor. You can see the floor plug for original MC access. I don't know why they couldn't make the bracket to fit the dual MC in its original location under the floor access plug!! ohwell No worries, my floorboards aren't concours perfect so I've got a 3 inch metal cutting hole saw on the way, will simply have two floor plugs instead of one. MC lid can easily be removed from underneath truck, then fluid poured in from top.

For trans clearance remember it has to be moved back toward the brake lines before it's lifted out.
Attachments
IMG_0816.JPEG (240.14 KB, 119 downloads)


Matthew 6:33

1952 Chevy 1/2-ton 3100
Late '55 235/SM420/torque tube 3.55
Dalton Highway survivor (using original 216)
www.truckwithaheart.com
Skooter #1300641 02/26/2019 2:43 AM
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
Originally Posted by Skooter
Attached pic looks straight up from floor. You can see the floor plug for original MC access. I don't know why they couldn't make the bracket to fit the dual MC in its original location under the floor access plug!! ohwell No worries, my floorboards aren't concours perfect so I've got a 3 inch metal cutting hole saw on the way, will simply have two floor plugs instead of one. MC lid can easily be removed from underneath truck, then fluid poured in from top.

For trans clearance remember it has to be moved back toward the brake lines before it's lifted out.

A couple places offer a larger access panel as well. Brothers being the better quality one that I’ve seen.


1953 Canadian GMC 9314 w/ (factory) Chevy 235
Tony AK49 #1301275 03/02/2019 12:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 731
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 731
Bonus: my sound abatement methods consisting of an old ripped floormat topped by a layer of 3/8?? carpet padding stuff followed by the nice floormat...actually pretty effective.

Anyways, I've always been fundamentally opposed to any departure from original. If there's any cutting of sheetmetal I want it to be as little as possible (although the cover Lindsey mentioned is ohh so tempting...and expensive). Received 3-inch holesaw today and promptly cut the MC access hole. Still need to order another original type floor plug. It's about 1/4-inch wider than MC lid and I can just reach in, grab and retrieve without crawling under the truck, another bonus. thumbs_up
Attachments
IMG_0940.JPEG (384.94 KB, 72 downloads)
IMG_0945.JPEG (292.37 KB, 71 downloads)


Matthew 6:33

1952 Chevy 1/2-ton 3100
Late '55 235/SM420/torque tube 3.55
Dalton Highway survivor (using original 216)
www.truckwithaheart.com
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
Dual master cylinder and access door showed up today. I ended up going with the kit from POL. I tried ordering from Brothers but they turned around and wanted a lot extra in shipping. Ill try installing once weather smartens up outside.


1953 Canadian GMC 9314 w/ (factory) Chevy 235
Skooter #1304959 03/28/2019 1:04 AM
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 214
Originally Posted by Skooter
Is there any reason to not use 3/16 brake lines coming out of both MC ports? Tighter bend will give an inch more side clearance to transmission, and the SM420 weighs 42,000 lbs so removal even with a cherry picker one wrong sway could damage stuff. Clearance space is good. thumbs_up Originally there's a 1/4 line going across bellhousing crossmember to passenger side (RF and both rear brakes), so I'd prefer 1/4 if I had my druthers but space is critical.

FYI, picture shows MC to rear trans support crossmember clearance with the Performance Online setup.

Did you decide on line sizes?


1953 Canadian GMC 9314 w/ (factory) Chevy 235

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.090s Queries: 18 (0.044s) Memory: 0.7331 MB (Peak: 0.9112 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 04:28:10 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS