The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
8 members (C10 - C90 Bill, Donf, DoubleB, Otto Skorzeny, Gdads51, Hanks custodian, Forty9, 1 invisible), 40 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,090
Posts1,056,020
Members48,430
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#129783 06/19/2002 10:24 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
4
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
4 Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
I ran into this article about fuel injecting a slant 6 Mopar and I thought it might be useful for stovebolting: efi for slant
It uses a GM 3.8L batch fired EFI setup and uses GM parts for the most part. It looks like it would work great on a 235 or 261. I don't think the siamese ports will be a problem if you set the injectors up right.


Paint & Body Shop moderator
A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
#129784 06/20/2002 5:27 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 20
P
Member
Member
P Offline
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 20
A fuel injection conversion is interesting.Do you think it would really be cost effective on such a breathing limited engine like a 235?Don't think there would be any real improvement as the engines are not emissions regulated, leaves more room for conventional carburation jetting. At wide open throttle, injection offers very little over a correctly sorted carburetor.The late Japenese superbikes make fantastic HP with carbs and superior engine designs although they may now use FI to meet emissions.If you have the time and the parts , do it and then we will all know if it works.


Porky Pig is just a ham.
#129785 06/20/2002 6:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
4
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
4 Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
Yes, it is true that fuel injection doesn't do much for max power. I think it would do a lot for a 235 with a cam. Fuel injection does a good job of regulating idle and part- throttle drivability. If you put a wild cam in the 235 you would get better breathing and the fuel injection would take some of the lumpies out of the cam.


Paint & Body Shop moderator
A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
#129786 06/25/2002 3:48 PM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9
D
Junior Member
Junior Member
D Offline
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9
Every time I look at the TBI setup in my '86 Fiero 2.5 four cylinder, I wonder how easy it would be to retrofit this to a 216...would need to install an o2 sensor, coolant temp sensor and elec. fuel pump, but that'd be about it.

I believe a stock TBI setup like that flows about 390 cfm, and all the works could be had off a junk 2.5 GM car for probably about nothing.

Has anyone actually done this ? Wouldn't exactly be a fire-breathing setup, but those TBI's are pretty reliable.

#129787 06/25/2002 9:34 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
4
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
4 Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
I think the trick to adapting fuel injections from a donor vehicle is to pick one from a car with a similar engine displacement and same number of cylinders. That way the fuel map is close and the injectors fire in the right sequence. I don't think a four cylinder fuel injection would work well on a six cylinder engine. The Buick 3.8L is 231 cid, very close to the 235.


Paint & Body Shop moderator
A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
#129788 06/25/2002 10:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,571
G
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
G Offline
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,571
Try GM ECM at diy-efi.org You can adapt just about any system to just about any engine, with enough reprogramming. I'm starting work on a TBI system for a 250 that's going to go in my 1954 GMC Panel, I have a computer for a 4.3L V6 that will drive two one-barrel TBI units on a two-carb manifold. Once I make some progress, I'll post more info (that may be a while...).


Get a REAL truck, get a GMC! www.oldgmctrucks.com
1954 GMC De Luxe COE
#129789 06/30/2002 7:15 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 12
E
eb1 Offline
Member
Member
E Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 12
I am putting a throttle body system from Affordable Fuel Injection on my 292. Do not have it running yet so I can't talk about problems. It uses a two barrel TB from 4.3L. System came with rebuilt TB, custom computer, wiring harness, all sensors, and modified distributor - for about $1250. Here is the site www.affordable-efi.com


'64 C10-292 with TBI, 4speed, 3.42 rear
#129790 06/30/2002 6:02 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
The thing I don't like about all these swaps / kits is that they aren't very open that I can tell. You are stuck with the algorithms that they design for emmissions and the sensors that they use without regard to the compatibility of putting them on an old stovebolt. I have bought a few books on TBI and TPI systems that cover theory and sensor types as well as where to get all this stuff (donor vehicles, supply houses, etc.) I am going to use a Motorola DSP based controller board that is commercially available and make a home brewed system for my 292. The first few minutes of running might be dicey . . . better have my stuff together! grin eek

#129791 06/30/2002 8:20 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 77
B
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
B Offline
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 77
8-2bbl 97s on a 292 hemi yea idle on all 8 run up to half throttle on 4 open de 4 outsides oops dinosaurs talk grin

i likes this stuff simple digital fi systems and looks real adapitable program from yer lap top zoom zoom zooom zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


i thinkzz traveling along at terminal velocity will soon wear a body out.

i will not die in shame if i never finish my dreams because my family iz my reality

can't wait until we can bed de ponys down, lite de fire, put on a big ol pot of coffee, and talk about how strong and brave our teams are.

bullfoot thinkszzzzzzzzzzz
#129792 06/30/2002 8:45 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 316
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 316
Looking at their index page, it says:
Quote
SDS is not intended for use on engines with siamesed intake ports or on TBI systems.
SDS does not use RS232 communication protocol and is not laptop or PC compatible.
Looks interesting, though.... cool grin


*** GMC ***
#129793 07/01/2002 6:08 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 12
E
eb1 Offline
Member
Member
E Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 12
I agree with Ken, that the systems on the market don't allow much input from the end user as to what components to mix and match. But they do have their place, for me I can justify using one because it should run out of the box, without all the trial & error on my part. This is important on my daily driver. When I have the money and time, I want to create a MPI system that also controls a turbo. The siamesed intake ports really seem to be the stopping point. So what if you use one of the 12 port aluminum heads(big money). Not a crossflow-I want to keep the intake & exhaust on the same side for the turbo. Could also use stuff like a crank trigger & distributorless ignition.


'64 C10-292 with TBI, 4speed, 3.42 rear
#129794 07/10/2002 5:08 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 215
O
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
O Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 215
were would you find a 12 port head {cross flow
or not} I would love to have one

my idea is to use the injecter system of a hipower
chevy Camaro or firbird v6 and then you can buy
a programer to ajust performenc


Luke Dahlin

1946 Chevy 2 ton
1966 Chevy 2 ton
1969 Chevy 3/4 ton 4wd
http://www.stovebolt.com/gallery/dahlin_luke_1969.html]1969 Chevy 3/4 ton 4x4
#129795 07/11/2002 9:48 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
4
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
4 Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
Most of the 12 port heads today were made by cutting the 4th cylinder off a pair of SBC heads and welding them together and re-drilling the block for the new bolt pattern. Not easy at all.


Paint & Body Shop moderator
A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
#129796 07/14/2002 6:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 12
E
eb1 Offline
Member
Member
E Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 12
Mike Kirby at www.sisellsautomotive.com sells them. You can also look around inliners site for other sources. I think most 12port heads are for late inline sixes. Also Santucci's manual has lots of pictures of all styles of heads.


'64 C10-292 with TBI, 4speed, 3.42 rear
#129797 07/18/2002 2:18 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 215
O
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
O Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 215
what about the injector systym off a
new chevy vortech six along whith a twelve port
head and high compression pistons on a 250
500 hp?? grin grin grin
and than stick that in my 53 I think that iswhat you would call a dream


Luke Dahlin

1946 Chevy 2 ton
1966 Chevy 2 ton
1969 Chevy 3/4 ton 4wd
http://www.stovebolt.com/gallery/dahlin_luke_1969.html]1969 Chevy 3/4 ton 4x4

Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0