The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (Stewart2, klhansen, Otto Skorzeny), 78 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,052
Posts1,055,718
Members48,426
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#129414 02/01/2002 10:31 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2
T
Junior Member
Junior Member
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2
I have a '60 261 engine I pulled out of a 60 series truck. I am toying with the idea of putting a weiand blower on this engine to go in my '57 stepside. I do not want to go the
V-8 route. Everyone, and there dog, puts a 350/350 in there truck, and to me thats just not to original. I think the hot six approach would be very cool and very period for the truck and would make for a nice street rod. My stepside had a 235 w/848 head in it, but its hopelessly tired. The blower/6 combo would give great torque and the power of a V-8, but be unique.

I am new here, but have visited this site many times. This site is very informative and helpful and very different from many other sites that I have visited. Alot of shared information and it seems like most of the postings are trying to help. I hope that I may get some of that positive and informed imput on this topic.

What I would like to know is this: Does anyone still make a 12 port head to fit this engine? I've seen pictures of a Wayne, and that looks to be just the ticket. The stock Chevy head, even the 848 casting, leave alot to be desired. Siamesed ports, poor airflow, heavy valves/rockers and the seat areas are all negatives and do not aid performance. You could port on one of these heads for a month, and still be wanting more performance/airflow!

Would I be farther ahead to go with a 302? Can I get a 12 port for that engine? I do not know anything about this engine (302), except that I have read about it several times here on the board. Thanks for any and all responses. :confused: eek :confused:


Scotty: I need more POWER!
Flight - 502
#129415 02/02/2002 7:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,586
T
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
T Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,586
Tim, if you have the money, go with the 302. Even with the stock head it will make alot more power than the 261 engine in a similar state of tune.The blower is something to think about because of the expense and length complications that may be a problem in the engine compartment.Maybe some one here or one www.inliners.org can give you actual experience on the set up.

#129416 02/02/2002 8:06 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 77
B
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
B Offline
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 77
blower motor hummm i likes de sound of that and i thinks maybe 7 mains like a 302 with a good stock head will breath just fine with the air stuffed in would be clean mean torque machine. and turbos don't do a bad job grin and leaves more horses not having to drive a blower and dem folks don't let de 12 port heads go cheap [jim you there?] wink

[ 02-02-2002: Message edited by: bullfoot ]


i thinkzz traveling along at terminal velocity will soon wear a body out.

i will not die in shame if i never finish my dreams because my family iz my reality

can't wait until we can bed de ponys down, lite de fire, put on a big ol pot of coffee, and talk about how strong and brave our teams are.

bullfoot thinkszzzzzzzzzzz
#129417 02/03/2002 2:34 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 72
D
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 72
To my knowledge no one is repoping the Wayne head for the 235/261 engine. Arias pistons is repoping the 12 port for the 302 GMC. I've only seen 1 Wayne head in person and a couple in pictures. Also the 302 GMC is only 4 mains (sorry Bullfoot). Deppe (sp) is making some water coled heads for the 292 Chevy, and making good horsepower out of them. If $$$$ is not a problem look at them. Hope this helps.
Dennis

#129418 02/03/2002 7:09 AM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,773
F
'Bolter
'Bolter
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,773
The Wayne heads are now collector's items. I did a web search for them a while back and found a website that listed where most of them are. With the 848 head professionally ported & shaved, full race cam, cast Fenton headers and dual two carbs you can get a bit over 200 hp out of a 261. The 302 stock gets you that much, and is a good engine to start with. But be prepared to have a bottomless wallet to get your parts. The 292 does have 7 mains and is also a good engine. there is a book that covers rodding the 292 family, Chevrolet Inline Six-Cylinder Power Manual by Leo Santucci. I recently bought one from Amazon, they can also be found at the Inliners web page


Fred
52 3600
69 C-10
#129419 02/03/2002 8:14 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
TIM . . . BLOW THAT BABY!!!! Forget about a 12 port head if you are going to be stuffing it with a compressor. Siamesed ports give you more staging volume and more even flow than you would get with dedicated runners and some argue the properly prepared siamese head flows better in certain conditions anyway due to the smoother flow of air rather associated with 2 cylinders pulling rather than the start / stop associated with only one pull every two revs of the motor. (not my words . . . but those of guys who get into the 10's in the 1/4 mile with siamesed heads)

[censored] Larrowe makes a cast intake for a 236/261 that allows bolt on of a Weiand blower or a B&M or a 4/6-71 blower - $400 for the casting ready to bolt onto your head, but you have to do the final machining (drilling mounting bolts) for your particular blower and make your own gasket or pay them $ to do it for you. Front bearings on these motors dont really like the side load to drive the belt but nothing is free when adding power to a 6.

Another book you need to look at is "Supercharged" by Corky Bell. Get it at Amazon.

After you read this book (and Leo Santuccis book Fred mentioned - not for your motor, but for the principles) you will be much better prepared to select the right cam, carb setup, timing setup, etc.

Have fun!! smile

#129420 02/06/2002 10:26 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2
T
Junior Member
Junior Member
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2
Thanks Guy's, for the informed responces. This is a great site. Sorry, I did not repost sooner, but with all the usual things going on you know, like kids, honey-doos and work and stuff. Probably not telling you guy's anything new, but you know how it is trying to work in time for your favorite projects, in and around the day to day schedule.

Sounds like time to retreat and regroup on my initial plans. Better to do further study and comparisions as you suggest, so as to get it right the first time. I will pick up both those books for research. Going to rethink this 261 idea. Maybe it would be better to go with a 292 or the 302, with longer stroke and more inches as you suggested. I don't have a preference on either size, as I have never worked on them. The 292 is newer, so it would be more likely to have more parts available. But the 302 would probably be more nostalgic. Cost is really not an object since I been saving my funds, and am prepared to spring four or five grand on the engine. (I knew there was a good reason my wife has that high paying job) grin grin

I just know I would prefer to stick with a six to be unique. Would appreciate any imput on choosing either 292 or 302. Positives and negatives on both, as far as chassis mounting, flywheel/clutch,
blower or turbo and why?, and FI or carbs. I plan on going with a Saginaw or Muncie 4 speed. I just love that "snap your head back" take off!

Thanks Again. smile


Scotty: I need more POWER!
Flight - 502
tim502 #1145022 01/16/2016 7:37 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,096
E
Crusing in the Passing Lane
Crusing in the Passing Lane
E Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,096
Tim,
If you added your location in your header, perhaps someone here is in your vicinity, could help with ideas, parts?

Ed


'37 GMC T-18 w/ DD 4-53T, RTO-610, 6231 aux., '95 GMC running gear, full disc brakes, power steering, 22.5 wheels and tires.
'47 GMC 1 ton w/ 302, NP-540, 4wd, full width Blazer front axle.
'54 GMC 630 w/ 503 gasser, 5 speed, ex fire truck, shortened WB 4', install 8' bed.
'55 GMC 370 w/270, 420 4 speed, grain, dump bed truck from ND. Works OK.
EdPruss #1145784 01/20/2016 11:57 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 200
1
'Bolter
'Bolter
1 Offline
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 200
I hope he's finished with this project by now, his last post before your's was 14 years ago. ohwell


We cannot solve our problems today using the same thinking we used when we created them!

Albert Einstein
12 Port #1145838 01/21/2016 4:40 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,820
6
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
6 Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,820
HELLO, Tim ..... are you there?


"Truckin' Around .......... Since 1937!"
My name is Joe and I am addicted to Classic Country Music. I just can't hep myself.
Operators are standing by to take your calls!
Now cruising in the Passing Lane
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Originally Posted by 6cylindersovertexas
HELLO, Tim ..... are you there?
Probably not - he last posted on 06/02/02


Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0