The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (artinva, RoadsScholar, Hotrod Lincoln, Bill Hanlon, Gdads51, 1 invisible), 88 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,078
Posts1,055,936
Members48,430
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1281573 09/26/2018 4:41 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 583
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 583
I need to replace the rear motor mounts on my 1939 JD, 216 stovebolt. I cannot lift the rear of the engine more than 1/8" off the cross member, making it virtually impossible to get to the bolts holding the motor mounts to the bell housing. The cross member is riveted to the side horns on the frame (4 rivets each side). I am thinking of removing the rivets, making it a whole lot easier to replace the mounts and using bolts/lock washers/ nuts to reattach the cross member. What say you stovebolt guru's?

Rick


1939 Chevrolet Stake Truck
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
Nothing wrong with that idea except, make sure that the cross member is not somehow trapped such that it has to slip out upwards towards motor. There may be a tapered flange or an obstacle or it may not slip out of the "C" channel. At any rate it will be tight and may have to be knocked loose.
Bolting is plenty strong.

I do not know if there is a way to lift the motor higher. Others will advise.


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
Sounds like a lot of work.

I'm not familiar with the 39 models, but I find it hard to believe that replacing motor mounts is very difficult. This would have been anticipated, and should be easy, certianly not by unriveting a cross member.
What does the shop manual say? Here's the page in 1938 manual http://chevy.oldcarmanualproject.com/shop/1938/38csm157.html



1951 GMC 250 in the Project Journals
1948 Chevrolet 6400 - Detroit Diesel 4-53T - Roadranger 10 speed overdrive - 4 wheel disc brakes
1952 Chevrolet 3800 pickup
---All pictures---
"First, get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish, and then in all probability you will succeed in doing it..." -Henry Maudslay-
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
I agree it sounds crazy. Things were not as anticipated back then. I've seen things like that. They only last a year or two until factory changes to common sense. Sometimes a component was attached to another prior to assembly in truck. They thought it was a good idea. Never realizing it was then "locked" for repair. Hope that is not the case. I don't know 1939 either. We all know that for many years maintenance/repair was not a design parameter. Bolt access was not considered. Not much better now. Pull the motor up to get oil pan off? No problem. Drain and pull the radiator to get fan off? No problem. Can't get the inside starter bolt off without taking tire and inner fender off? No problem. Oil spills all over because filter is mounted horizontally? No problem.

In 60-66 GMC, I have seen factory riveted cross members and factory bolted cross members. On the riveted cross member, motor was too long to remove with 4 sp. Could not get 4 sp out after unbolting from bell housing until rotated, rolled, jammed and slipped down. A 150 lb slug of iron waiting to crush your face and decapitate your fingers. Lots of fun. I would have rather gone to the dentist.


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,878
In my experience older vehicles are easier to work on, they did think about these things.
Modern vehicles have so much stuff crammed in a small space they are difficult.

1939 should be easy enough.
The 1938 manual says nothing of removing the cross member to service the mounts, nor removing the cab to remove the engine.
You much be able to remove and replace the mounts without much trouble.


1951 GMC 250 in the Project Journals
1948 Chevrolet 6400 - Detroit Diesel 4-53T - Roadranger 10 speed overdrive - 4 wheel disc brakes
1952 Chevrolet 3800 pickup
---All pictures---
"First, get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish, and then in all probability you will succeed in doing it..." -Henry Maudslay-
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 583
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 583
I can remove the motor mount bolt/nut going thru the cross member. The angle of the cross member where it is riveted to the frame does not allow any room to get a socket on the lower bolt holding the motor mount to the bell housing. I can get the top bolt holding the motor mount to the bell housing off. The clutch/brake levers and master cylinder bracket allow for virtually no room to lift the rear of the engine up off the cross member more than 1/8". The top the transmission also hits the bottom of the floor board. Not enough room to get to those lower bolts. I had to cut a 5/8 deep socket to 2 inches long just to get to the top bolts. I imagine during assembly back in 1939 the drive train was lowered onto the frame before the cab/sheet metal were installed. I'm going to go back out to my workshop and reassess this dilemma. It definitely needs new motor mounts.

Rick


1939 Chevrolet Stake Truck
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,094
T
'Bolter
'Bolter
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,094
I'm not familiar with a 39, but on my 59 and the AD trucks the center of the floor above the transmission is removable. Would this allow the engine to be raised up enough? Just a thought.


Tommy
59 apache 1/2t
261 short stepside
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 583
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 583
Update -

I removed the floorboard. Could lift the engine up maybe 3/8". Easier to get to the motor mount to bellhousing bolts from the top inside the cab, than from below. Still had a clearance problem trying to use any 5/8" socket/ratchet combo. Finally, I used a 5/8" spark plug socket that had the 3/4 end fitting for a 3/4" wrench. I cut it to 1-3/8" from end to end, just enough to clear edge of motor mount. That accomplished the task. The motor mounts were definitely toast. Still have to reinstall the floorboard.

Rick


1939 Chevrolet Stake Truck
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 92
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by rickmg
Update -

I removed the floorboard. Could lift the engine up maybe 3/8". Easier to get to the motor mount to bellhousing bolts from the top inside the cab, than from below. Still had a clearance problem trying to use any 5/8" socket/ratchet combo. Finally, I used a 5/8" spark plug socket that had the 3/4 end fitting for a 3/4" wrench. I cut it to 1-3/8" from end to end, just enough to clear edge of motor mount. That accomplished the task. The motor mounts were definitely toast. Still have to reinstall the floorboard.

Rick

Thanks 4 the update/tip. I'll be tearing into my 48 this weekend.
There's not any rubber left in/on any my mounts.... Only stalactites of dried tar hanging off the crossmembers.

Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
I replaced mine and I believe I actually used a wrench not a socket. Lay on the floor reach up. If I remember correctly.

Don


Can’t begin to tell you how much I hate the name Stovebolt.
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 583
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 583
Don

The head of the bolts were recessed 2" inside the rubber of the motor mount. The cross member is at a 45 degree angle within a one inch of the motor mount. That's why I cut down the spark plug socket to fit.

Rick


1939 Chevrolet Stake Truck

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0