The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
2 members (BC59, 1 invisible), 152 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,088
Posts1,056,110
Members48,434
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1268011 06/03/2018 4:04 PM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
After installing a PCV in the top of my draft tube and connecting it to the intake manifold. I’m experiencing a harder start.

1) What adjustments may be required? Will this make it run rich or lean?

2) Will or should the truck run better?

3) I installed the V237 as recommended. How do I know it’s right and working properly?

Thanks for the help, Don

I took some pictures with an iPhone and dumbed them down to 133kb. But for some other reason I was not able to get them excepted.



Can’t begin to tell you how much I hate the name Stovebolt.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 843
Y
yar Offline
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
Y Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 843
Don,

Does your 216 have a rear main seal that would allow the inside of the engine to actually hold a vacuum? If not, a PCV system will just pull contaminants in through the rear main bearing area. That was the case on my '36 Chevy 206 engine and I had to abandon the idea of adding PCV.

If I were building the engine today I would try to adapt in a rear main seal. But when I assembled the engine 45 years ago adding PCV was not even a fantasy.


Ray
yar #1268029 06/03/2018 8:37 PM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
Well Yar this I the first I’ve heard of this in all the posts about making the change.

Don


Can’t begin to tell you how much I hate the name Stovebolt.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,337
1940 was the first 216 to use a rear main seal.


See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet!
My Blog
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 843
Y
yar Offline
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
Y Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 843
"Well Yar this I the first I’ve heard of this in all the posts about making the change."

Don,

I didn't know either until I built a complete PCV system and found that there was no vacuum in the crankcase with the engine creating 21 inches of vacuum idling. So I attached my AC service vacuum pump and turned it on and heard the noise of air rushing into the crankcase through the back of the engine. Checking further I found that the engine has a huge oil drain-back passage between the pan and the slinger on the back of the crankshaft. Prior to that I thought that the only opening to outside air at the back of the crankshaft was the rear main bearing clearance. Live and learn, huh?

I'm sorry to be a bearer of bad news Don but unless a rear main seal is added the PCV system won't work.

My '36 restored pickup pickup has been running since 1976 with the draft tube system so I guess it'll stay like that forever.


Ray
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
Originally Posted by Pre '68 Dave
1940 was the first 216 to use a rear main seal.

Yar^^^^


Can’t begin to tell you how much I hate the name Stovebolt.
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
Anyone have any posts pertaining to my original questions?

Don


Can’t begin to tell you how much I hate the name Stovebolt.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,280
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,280
Either your PCV has a huge orifice in it, or you have a problem other than the PCV.
Check your engine vacuum at idle with, and then without the PCV in the loop.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
52Carl #1268089 06/04/2018 2:44 PM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
Originally Posted by 52Carl
Either your PCV has a huge orifice in it, or you have a problem other than the PCV.
Check your engine vacuum at idle with, and then without the PCV in the loop.

Going to this afternoon. The valve I a standard V237. This is where I don’t shine. Figuring out issues. I did expect it to run differently after the PCV add and the new exhaust system.

Thx Don

Last edited by Don huffer; 06/04/2018 2:45 PM.

Can’t begin to tell you how much I hate the name Stovebolt.
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
I was hoping someone would say, “well when you make that change, be sure to look for or check if.......

Don


Can’t begin to tell you how much I hate the name Stovebolt.
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,489
J
Moderator, Electrical Bay
Moderator, Electrical Bay
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,489
Don, the PCV I added to the 235 didn't make much noticeable difference in the running. At least not yet. It runs leaner...and I expected that, but the engine vacuum isn't much lower. I used a 3/8 inch hose from the intake manifold to the modified crankcase draft tube and then I used a 1/4 inch reducer at the valve cover because I wanted more negative pressure inside the engine. It seems to be doing ok and as the engine has been rebuilt there's not a great amount of blow-by anyhow. Good luck.
Jon


~ Jon
1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end
Jon G #1268142 06/05/2018 1:06 AM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
Originally Posted by Jon G
Don, the PCV I added to the 235 didn't make much noticeable difference in the running. At least not yet. It runs leaner...and I expected that, but the engine vacuum isn't much lower. I used a 3/8 inch hose from the intake manifold to the modified crankcase draft tube and then I used a 1/4 inch reducer at the valve cover because I wanted more negative pressure inside the engine. It seems to be doing ok and as the engine has been rebuilt there's not a great amount of blow-by anyhow. Good luck.
Jon

Jon
I’m not really experiencing any problems. Wasn’t sure until this afternoon but it turns out my rough idle is caused by a bad plug wire. I also adjusted the idle mixture a smidg.

Thank for your reply, Don


Can’t begin to tell you how much I hate the name Stovebolt.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,280
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,280
Just as I predicted. An unrelated issue, You are welcome...


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
52Carl #1268190 06/05/2018 3:36 PM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
Originally Posted by 52Carl
Just as I predicted. An unrelated issue, You are welcome...

Sorry to have not given credit to you but it was your post the pointed me in the right direction. This is how I installed the PCV in my 216

Thx Don
Attachments


Can’t begin to tell you how much I hate the name Stovebolt.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,280
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,280
Very clean looking setup there Don!
I wasn't looking for credit. I am so full of crap, sometimes I annoy myself. smile


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
52Carl #1268249 06/06/2018 3:26 AM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
D
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
D Offline
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 370
Thanks Carl

Don


Can’t begin to tell you how much I hate the name Stovebolt.
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,362
M
'Bolter
'Bolter
M Offline
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,362
Don, that is a very nice PVC setup. It'd pass for stock to many casual fans. I'd copy your work but I'm running vacuum wipers and suspect I'd have insufficient vacuum for both the PVC and wipers?


RonR


1951 3600 with Clark flatbed, T5, 4.10 rear
1970 340 Duster
1990 5.0 V8 Miata (1990 Mustang Gt Drivetrain)
1964 CJ5
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,214
V
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
V Offline
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,214
I added a PCV to my 49 216 back in 2013 and it reduced the amount of smokey blowby from the 3 valve cover vents and didn't cause any problems with overall engine performance. I originally tried Deve's mod but the lower end of my 216's engine is well worn and produced too much oil film residue in the intake vacuum port. So I modified the draft tube to put more baffles and space between the PCV and crankcase and this reduced the oil film deposits in the intake to almost nil...
Below is a copy of the final setup thats I've been running for approx 20k miles. The vacuum wipers do work and have worked many times with this final setup.

Originally Posted by Volfandt
Update. Heres a pic of the PCV mounted in the road draft tube. It is still a temp setup so don't mind my little rigged up strap to hold the PCV into the grommet.
I figure the gorilla glue will eventually let loose and when it does I have a 30.08mm freeze plug that I will drive into the road draft tube w/a proper grommet that will hold the PCV. Until then this works grin

I went w/a PV1053 PCV is is the straight eqivilent to the 90 degree angled PV 141. The straight PCV lined up better.

The larger PCV that I tried and didn't work was the PV233. It is all metal and also straight but came w/a 90 degree adaptor. IT would stay in the glued in grommet without my rigged up strap but unfortunately is too large and draws too much vaccum which negatively effected the vaccum windshield wipers.
Dave


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0