The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
2 members (Gdads51, 55shaker), 85 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,054
Posts1,055,782
Members48,426
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 173
T
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 173
Good morning. We have a 1952 3100. Attempted to install a dual master under the cab in the location of the old master. Using the following parts...

https://www.classicparts.com/1947-59-Dual-Master-Cylinder/productinfo/71%2D201/

https://www.classicparts.com/1947-54-Master-Cylinder-Adapter-Kit/productinfo/71%2D984/

The adapter kit bolts in using the old bolts from the original master. The MC mounting surface faces towards the rear of the truck. The MC then mounts to it from the back side.

We mounted the adapter bracket first and then attempted to lift up the dual master and it was obvious there was going to be clearance issues with the rear transmission cross member. Has anyone ever installed one of these before?

We had a different truck a few years ago that was titled as a 1951 but had all the 1952 characteristics. We installed the exact same kit without issue on that truck. Now, in hind site, that truck had a different rear end, a 235 and I'm assuming a different transmission. This truck has the stock rear end, torque tube, etc. It does have a 235 also. Not sure if transmission is original.

So, is there a difference in cross members in a 1951 and 1952?



Ron and Ryan Hill
1952 Chevy 3100
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 173
T
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 173
Well, a different viewpoint and approach makes all the difference. We had installed just the bracket to the truck and then tried to mount the master cylinder to the bracket. This is where the apparent issues with the cross member materialized. I pulled the bracket off and installed the mc to the bracket first. I then when down under the truck to see if I needed to drill new holes, etc. I lifted the rear of the mc up over the cross member and then started to slide the bracket forward. That's when I noticed the holes lined right up. So, the mc fits fine. It's about an 1/8 of an inch above the cross member. So, we are good. If at first you don't succeed....


Ron and Ryan Hill
1952 Chevy 3100
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,440
Bolter
Bolter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,440
Don’t you just love it when a plan comes together!🛠


Martin
'62 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed (Restomod in progress)
'47 Chevy 3100 5 Window (long term project)
‘65 Chevy Biscayne (Emily)
‘39 Dodge Business Coupe (Clarence)
“I fought the law and the law won" now I are a retired one!
Support those brave men/women who stand the "Thin Blue Line"! Hug a cop!
USAF 1965-1969 Weather Observation Tech (I got paid to look at the clouds)


Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0