Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
8 members (Dennys28, Ponchogl, VicZ, Hotrod Lincoln, Southerntruck, Cosmo, Patina 54, 1 invisible),
133
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,087 Posts1,055,977 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Oct 2015 Posts: 10 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Oct 2015 Posts: 10 | i have a 1950 chevy 1 ton, 6v, SRW with a dump box. the motor is a 261, it has the original transmission and i've got the 5.14 gears in the rear. i would like to put a T5 transmission in it, but i will lose the PTO output. i was wondering if someone could recommend something like a 6v motor to drive the PTO or a different trans or just a different setup in order to not lose the PTO.
thank in advance
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 Crusing in the Passing Lane | | Crusing in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 | If you get a GM 14 bolt rear, you can keep your dump system as is; or you could make the PTO pump, engine driven via belt, a lot of work.
Ed
'37 GMC T-18 w/ DD 4-53T, RTO-610, 6231 aux., '95 GMC running gear, full disc brakes, power steering, 22.5 wheels and tires. '47 GMC 1 ton w/ 302, NP-540, 4wd, full width Blazer front axle. '54 GMC 630 w/ 503 gasser, 5 speed, ex fire truck, shortened WB 4', install 8' bed. '55 GMC 370 w/270, 420 4 speed, grain, dump bed truck from ND. Works OK.
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,782 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,782 | Mount a power steering pump on the engine, and use a hydraulic motor to drive the PTO pump. Be aware it's going to be pretty slow. Also, the T5 will be way too light duty for the application you're considering. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2015 Posts: 10 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Oct 2015 Posts: 10 | Hi guys thank for the reply Do you think the GM 14 bolt comes in 3.73 and do you think the engine is powerful enough to drive it or is there a better ratio to use. i don't really want to use 4.10 gears (just doesn't seem like it's enough gain for the expense). See I never thought of using a power steering pump to power the hydraulics, that's an awesome idea. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 103 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 103 | 4.10's are a significant difference from the 5.14's. I think you would find a good medium there between acceptable highway speeds and available power. Gotta remember that there were no such thing as an interstate in '50!
Jerry, just curious, why would the T-5 be too light duty for a 148 HP engine? The 4.3 puts out a whopping 180! | | | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 Crusing in the Passing Lane | | Crusing in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 | You might also consider use and number of nearby mountains when considering 4.10 or 3.73(which 14 bolt's have) , number of nearby freeways.
Ed
'37 GMC T-18 w/ DD 4-53T, RTO-610, 6231 aux., '95 GMC running gear, full disc brakes, power steering, 22.5 wheels and tires. '47 GMC 1 ton w/ 302, NP-540, 4wd, full width Blazer front axle. '54 GMC 630 w/ 503 gasser, 5 speed, ex fire truck, shortened WB 4', install 8' bed. '55 GMC 370 w/270, 420 4 speed, grain, dump bed truck from ND. Works OK.
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,782 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,782 | why would the T-5 be too light duty for a 148 HP engine? The 4.3 puts out a whopping 180! Try gettinng the truck loaded up with dirt or gravel, and then hit a section of washboard road on a hard pull- - - - -the inertia of several times the weight of the vehicle the T-5 was intended to work with will take teeth off the gears like shellng an ear of dried corn. The gears in the SM-420 weren't over-engineered for no reason at all. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 103 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 103 | | | | | | Joined: Nov 1995 Posts: 5,719 62401 | | 62401 Joined: Nov 1995 Posts: 5,719 | Before getting too crazy with transmission swaps, etc, you might want to read our Techtip on swapping out your rear axle's third member for one with a 4.10 ratio Heck of a lot simpler than what's been discussed so far....  And the 4.10 is a heck of a nice improvement over the original ratio. I've done it in my AD 1-ton and was quite pleased. One of our users (mrf1002u) was honchoing a swap deal with the rock crawlers -- they wanted our original 5.x ratio third members and were swapping us their 4.10's AND covering the shipping. All we had to pay for were the new gaskets and oil to refill the axle. Just my uninformed personal opinion, but I think your truck would be pretty gutless with the 3.x gearing.
Last edited by John Milliman; 08/21/2017 11:02 AM.
~ John A kid raised on Hotwheels, Matchbox and Tonka cannot be reasonably expected to own only one vehicle as an adult. 1949 Chevrolet 3804In the Legacy Gallery | In the Gallery Forum1973 IH 1310 Dump1963 Kaiser M38A12001 International/AmTran RE3000 "Skoolie"2014 Ford E-350 4x4 (Quigley) | | | | | Joined: Feb 2013 Posts: 614 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2013 Posts: 614 | I Second Johns suggestion! I also made the 4:10 swap, with the help of the ODSS! The ratio works great. I had two yards of top soil in the truck and it handled it with no problem. I'm totally stock with a 92hp, 216. It was actually the first time I used first gear for a normal drive. Your choice, but I would try the easy route first. Good luck, Jim | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | yes, the 4.10 ratio is great for an original 1 ton, I have that in my 51 GMC with original 228.
Though I haven't tried it my opinion is the 3.73 ratio might be OK in flat country and or if you don't haul anything much. Otherwise the 4.10 is pretty good all around, no to fast, not to slow, and considering the low engine HP and only just adequate brakes staying a little slow is a good thing. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2015 Posts: 10 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Oct 2015 Posts: 10 | I guess I need to rethink the whole thing. I would love to do a center section swap but trying to find one has been a bit tough. I looked around locally but nothing yet, I guess i'll just keep looking.
| | |
| |