Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
3 members (Otto Skorzeny, Gdads51, 1 invisible),
137
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,109 Posts1,056,266 Members48,439 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Nov 2015 Posts: 84 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2015 Posts: 84 | I have a 1950 5 window 1/2 ton gmc. With a 216 and 3 in the tree. All original so it also has the enclosed drive shaft. It runs and drives great . That being said I have a chance at a 292. Will the 292 bolt right in .or what can of worms would I be opening up? Just a thought at this stage. Thanks | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | A 292 will not bolt right in.
Different motor mounts Different clutch-housing bolt pattern. Longer block than 216/235/261 (even longer with water-pump/fan). | | | | | Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 2,074 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 2,074 | Not a direct bolt in but would be well worth the swap if you want to make a great driver out of your truck. Will be a project, needing motor mount kit and a change out of the rest of your old drive train. 292 bolts up to modern automatics and standard tranys. Best of luck | | | | | Joined: Nov 2015 Posts: 84 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2015 Posts: 84 | Interesting looks like I need to think on it . Thanks for the info. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2015 Posts: 914 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2015 Posts: 914 | You have a 1/2 ton that is not going to haul much so the added work does not make it worth the effort. And, it will be a lot of work.
Want some more top end 3.55 gears maybe available for your year and model truck. Jeffrey | | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,280 Renaissance Man | | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,280 | If someone gave me a nice 292, I would take it. I would then turn right around and sell it and use that money towards buying a small block V8. There is a kit offered by CPP which makes dropping a 350 in these old trucks a breeze. There is absolutely no wow factor looking at a 292 in the engine bay of a 1950 truck IMHO, and they are gas hogs.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | | Joined: Nov 2015 Posts: 84 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2015 Posts: 84 | Lots of good opinions here. My 216 is running good and strong for what it is. I tend to keep it under 3000 rpm for the most part. Usually about 55 mph up to about 65 max. At 65 tack reads about 2800 roughly. old school split manifold dual straight piped. Not too loud till about 55 mph at which point I believe I should be wearing ear plugs lol. This usually keeps me under about 55. Not much traffic around here so it's not a big deal. So I may keep looking for the right engine for a direct fit for when the 216 gives up. Any opinions on a 261 ? | | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,804 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,804 | 261's are great engines- - - -just a little hard to find and pricey when you do. The hot setup is the "Cadillac stroker" buildup that brings the displacement up close to 300 cubic inches. It's an expensive modification, using 292 connecting rods and Cadillac V8 pistons, and requiring some custom crankshaft grinding. http://www.angelfire.com/nv/conv/stovebolt.htmlJerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | You have more choices for 261s on Canada than we do down south.
The Canadian Pontiac used a 261 with hydraulic lifters.
The only considerations/adaptations you might need would be to "relocate" the water pump and use your older clutch housing/assembly.
A 261, and changin the ring/pinion gears to 3.55 would give you a real nice cruiser. | | | | | Joined: Nov 2015 Posts: 84 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2015 Posts: 84 | Speaking of the 261 . What are the differences between a 261 from say a grain truck or from a Pontiac car. Hydraulic lifters ? I here years ago the 261 was what everyone wanted for an upgrade. And then hot rod from there. The Pontiac I here was only Canadian eh. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | USA/Canadian truck 261 - mechanical lifters Canadian Pontiac 261 - hydraulic lifters
The 261 was only available on trucks in the USA. | | |
| |