The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (Ricks Big Dump, Donf, Peggy M, 1 invisible), 148 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,086
Posts1,056,101
Members48,434
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 6
I
New Guy
New Guy
I Offline
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 6
A guy has a clamshell fold down tail light he says fits the 49-53 Suburban. It looks identical to the 55.2 and up version. Anyone know if they were the same? Thanks in advance for any help.


idaho
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
You mean the one on Ebay? Looks the Same


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Maybe someone can look up part number 897861 in Group 2.679, Lamp, Tail & Stop for years after 1957?

It is the same part for;
41-52 Station Wagon (left side in 41-48, and center in 49-52)
47-57 Canopy Express and Suburban with End Gate

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
TC, be sure you are talking the swing down. If you are, you have answered that they are the same when you show to 47-57. But if they are same for 57 they are also same to 59. I agree with same.
The station wagon is illegitimi non carborundum.


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 6
I
New Guy
New Guy
I Offline
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 6
Yes Bart, the one on Ebay. Thanks so much to both of you guys for your help, I finally have clarification.


idaho
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
" TC, be sure you are talking the swing down."

Bartamos,

The Suburban with End Gate has the swing-down lamp, as listed in my earlier post.

I guessed it was the same on Station Wagon to 1959, but the online Parts Manual only went to 1957 (that is why I asked, and gave the GM part number). Thanks for the additional-years info.

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
Your info is good proof. Appreciate your research. I did focus on the end gate 57 but was confused by also used on Station wagon. I am not sure if a station wagon had it or not. No offence intended.


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
I think the MPB indicates that the station wagon is the same (through 1957):

http://chevy.oldcarmanualproject.com/1929_57chevyparts/57cmpc0241.htm

fortuitous, I'd say

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
I don't know how to read that page.
L.,
L.,
Center

Are those all for 897861? Does L. mean left? Why the comma? The swing down would always be in the center of the tail gate?


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Good question(s).

I assume (meaning, make an [censored]-of-You-and-Me) that it means that the same part was, in the years designated, installed/displayed on the left of the lower endgate and in some years it was installed/displayed on the center of the endgate.

My assumption is supported by any/no same rear-lamp not being listed for any other location for the same vehicle in the years designated. And, no other rear-lamp is designated for those vehicles.

Apparently, that lamp swung/swang/swanged down in either location?

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
Negatory. Until I see a swing down not in center, I'm sticking with my story. Maybe the L. does not mean left? I see designations "R.H." in places. Some of these old documents had several different draftsman (PC: Drafter) who just pulled any old abbreviation out of their assume. The FAM is famous for that.


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
I agree about the 1957 station wagon.

What about the rear lamp on the 1957 Suburban (with end gate)?

http://cdn.barrett-jackson.com/staging/carlist/items/Fullsize/Cars/15630/15630_Rear_3-4_Web.jpg

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
I don't know about the part number/L., thing, But to answer his question, I think we did.


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn

Moderated by  MNSmith, Rusty Rod 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0