Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,081 Posts1,056,078 Members48,434 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jul 2010 Posts: 6 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jul 2010 Posts: 6 | A guy has a clamshell fold down tail light he says fits the 49-53 Suburban. It looks identical to the 55.2 and up version. Anyone know if they were the same? Thanks in advance for any help.
idaho
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 Sir Searchalot | | Sir Searchalot Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 | You mean the one on Ebay? Looks the Same
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | Maybe someone can look up part number 897861 in Group 2.679, Lamp, Tail & Stop for years after 1957?
It is the same part for; 41-52 Station Wagon (left side in 41-48, and center in 49-52) 47-57 Canopy Express and Suburban with End Gate
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 Sir Searchalot | | Sir Searchalot Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 | TC, be sure you are talking the swing down. If you are, you have answered that they are the same when you show to 47-57. But if they are same for 57 they are also same to 59. I agree with same. The station wagon is illegitimi non carborundum.
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn | | | | | Joined: Jul 2010 Posts: 6 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jul 2010 Posts: 6 | Yes Bart, the one on Ebay. Thanks so much to both of you guys for your help, I finally have clarification.
idaho
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | " TC, be sure you are talking the swing down."
Bartamos,
The Suburban with End Gate has the swing-down lamp, as listed in my earlier post.
I guessed it was the same on Station Wagon to 1959, but the online Parts Manual only went to 1957 (that is why I asked, and gave the GM part number). Thanks for the additional-years info. | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 Sir Searchalot | | Sir Searchalot Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 | Your info is good proof. Appreciate your research. I did focus on the end gate 57 but was confused by also used on Station wagon. I am not sure if a station wagon had it or not. No offence intended.
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 Sir Searchalot | | Sir Searchalot Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 | I don't know how to read that page. L., L., Center
Are those all for 897861? Does L. mean left? Why the comma? The swing down would always be in the center of the tail gate?
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | Good question(s).
I assume (meaning, make an [censored]-of-You-and-Me) that it means that the same part was, in the years designated, installed/displayed on the left of the lower endgate and in some years it was installed/displayed on the center of the endgate.
My assumption is supported by any/no same rear-lamp not being listed for any other location for the same vehicle in the years designated. And, no other rear-lamp is designated for those vehicles.
Apparently, that lamp swung/swang/swanged down in either location?
| | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 Sir Searchalot | | Sir Searchalot Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 | Negatory. Until I see a swing down not in center, I'm sticking with my story. Maybe the L. does not mean left? I see designations "R.H." in places. Some of these old documents had several different draftsman (PC: Drafter) who just pulled any old abbreviation out of their assume. The FAM is famous for that.
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 Sir Searchalot | | Sir Searchalot Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 | I don't know about the part number/L., thing, But to answer his question, I think we did.
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn | | |
| |