Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,154 Posts1,056,850 Members48,456 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#11891 02/29/2004 6:51 AM | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 2 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 2 | I have a 1951 3100 with a 235. Just today I bought a 1971 c10 with a 350/350 and 12bolt rearend. I plan to put the engine/tranny and rearend in my 51. Can my 1951 straight axle front suspension handle a V8? I haven't seen too many trucks like mine with V8s who haven't gone with the IFS. Would I be better off trying to put my 51 body onto the 71 chassis? I had a friend swear this would be my best bet. (even though the 71 is a longbed, his answer was to cut a section out of the frame). If anyone has any ideas, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks, - Jeff | | |
#11892 02/29/2004 6:59 AM | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,851 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,851 | I think I'd stick with the early chassis, and add a leaf or two in the front springs, if necessary. Doing a body swap is going to involve a lot of work, and there's no guarantee it would look right when it's finished. Cutting and splicing a frame is a tricky job, too. We do it on the roundtrack cars, but that's an entirely different situation than building a street machine. BTW, the weight difference between the stovebolt and the 350 isn't much. Those old sixes are HEAVY! Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | |
#11894 02/29/2004 11:23 PM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | The front suspension from the '71 can be adapted to the stock '51 frame. You need to make some spacers to fit between the frame and the crossmember, and between the steering box and the crossmember, to make that work. And you still have the track width problem.
Plus, the rear from that '71 will be too wide under the back of your '51.
You'll be looking for offset wheels for both ends.
Provided you aren't worried about the track width issues, I'd rather adapt the front suspension than shorten the frame and build all new mounts, but that's just my opinion.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
#11896 03/01/2004 4:23 AM | Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 23 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 23 | Jeff, You might want to search the archives at one time someone had a question about the weight of a 235 (6) compared to a 350. If memory serves me right the somebody posted weights of chevy motors and the 350 is actually lighter than the 235. So my advise is to keep the straight axle, put the 350 in, and ditch the rearend at a swap meet and find something that fits better. By the way I am a born and bred husker, currently living in the Land of the Big 10, be still show my colors.
Willy 57 | | |
#11897 03/01/2004 12:39 PM | Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 1,586 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 1,586 | I don't believe the rear axle is too wide. I put a 80 Chevy 1/2 ton 4x4 rear axle in my 51,only an inch or so wider than the original, I bet the 70 something axle is the same width as the 80 axle. The small block will fit, you have jimmy the steering box over a touch,the stock exhaust manifold is a tight fit on left side.Some use a right side mani rear dump on the left,some say a rams horn works, a little trial and error. If ya drive hard,it's best to add discs in the front,the stock drums are marginal for fast driving. | | |
#11898 03/04/2004 4:36 AM | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 2 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 2 | Thanks for all your advice. I've decided to pull the engine/tranny and rearend. The rear axle of the 71 measures out about the same as the 51, but the 71's front axle was alot wider. And with the body/frame swap, I think I'd be looking at alot more work with 2 trucks cluttering my garage for a longer period of time. Thanks again! Jeff | | |
#11899 03/04/2004 7:13 PM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | Originally posted by Tony: I don't believe the rear axle is too wide. I put a 80 Chevy 1/2 ton 4x4 rear axle in my 51,only an inch or so wider than the original, I bet the 70 something axle is the same width as the 80 axle. The rear axle under my '72 C10 is too wide to go under my '55 1st Suburban. I know axle widths have been different year to year, but I'd suggest measuring carefully before committing to a course of action.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
| |