The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (Guitplayer, Jon G, 3800GUY, TexasA&M48Truck, JW51, joe apple), 551 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,777
Posts1,039,270
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
M
'Bolter
'Bolter
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
HI Stovebolters

I am currently debating on switching my current 1985 K5 Chevy Blazer rear end with 4.10 gears with a more modern Chevy Colorado rear end with 3.42 gears in it.

With the 4.10's hooked behind the current stock 4 speed (sm420 ?? I think) my first gear is a granny gear....second gear is like a normal 1 st gear and 3rd and 4th gears are like the normal 2nd and 3rd gear is in today vehicles. I know from a high end aspect the the lower the number in the rear end will result in a higher top end with lower rpm's in the end.

So will the 3.42's make the 1st and 2nd gear's a little more user friendly??? or will it make harder to use???

Any insight would be a wonderful thing.

MikeC


1951 Chevy 3800 1-Ton
Howard Knapp
In the Stovebolt Gallery
1948 Chevy 1-Ton (sold Nov 2017)
1953 Chevy 1-Ton (sold 10/1/2016)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,596
4
'Bolter
'Bolter
4 Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,596
The taller gears (3.42 is "taller" than 4.10) will make it slower off the line. It might make it a little more user friendly, but I wouldn't think it would be a considerable difference. Why not just get 3.42's for your current rear end? If you change to the Colorado your brakes are different again, you have to worry about mounting and all that... Seems like not the best way to make the change.

Is there a reason you want to use the Colorado? The width of the rear end is also narrower than the K5.

I know that you've been having frustrations with your truck, I don't think this is the right way for you to get taller gears.


1946 GMC Pickup - S-10 Frame, 455 Buick, TH400, original patina.

My 46 GMC on Photobucket
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
It will make a much better driver out of it. All gears will be higher ratio but you have the granny 1st gear for rock crawling.
If it is 4 wheel drive you will have to replace both axles.
The manual 4 speed in that will be a SM 465.

Last edited by Wrenchbender Ret.; 06/15/2016 9:10 PM.

They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,061
Big Bolt Forum Moderator
Big Bolt Forum Moderator
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,061
I had 3.42 gears in my 59 Suburban with a 350/SM465 and 31x10.10-15 tires. It was very driveable. I only used granny as a granny and could go down the road 90mph+ if I decided to. You will still only user granny every now and then.


Mike
1955 Chevy 6400 ex-flatbed (no bed now!) sold September 2023
In the Stovebolt Gallery
1958 Chevy 6400 flatbed W/dump
In the Stovebolt Gallery
1959 Chevy Suburban Owned for almost 20 years, Daily Driver -- sold May 2016
In the Stovebolt Gallery

Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof

Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.048s Queries: 14 (0.045s) Memory: 0.6127 MB (Peak: 0.6515 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 13:25:08 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS