The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 196 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,081
Posts1,056,078
Members48,434
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1150611 02/17/2016 5:54 AM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,096
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,096
I'm contemplating a '48 235 rebuild .

What max overbore is normal for this engine .

Thanks for your time smile

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269

http://chevy.oldcarmanualproject.com/shop/1948_51truck/51ctsm0624.htm

Shop Manual says 0.040" oversize, but, I have seen people post that larger pistons are available and can be used. Someone will correct/confirm a max practical/available oversize.

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,096
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,096
Thanks Tim , that's what I was looking for .

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 285
G
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
G Offline
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 285
I'm no expert by any means, but I have a 1955 235 bored .060" over. I found .080" pistons when looking to rebuild it and read about some.100" pistons being put in high performance applications, hut no one actually carried them.

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
P
'Bolter
'Bolter
P Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,922
1/2" over is perfectly safe, everyone says so.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
I have a 1961 261 that was .060 overbored in 1972 (my second engine rebuild).

It has been back in my Suburban for about 10 years.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,795
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,795
Millions of stovebolt engines have run for decades with .060" and .080" overbores. When boring a block for a sleeve, it's common to bore the cylinder 3/16"(0.1875") or 1/4"(0.250") oversize without hitting water, but an overbore that size would not be suitable to run a piston in. I have sleeved hundreds of cylinders without any issues, so it's possible to salvage a worn or damaged block as long as there are no cracks or holes in the cylinder wall in the top or bottom 1/2" to 3/4" of the cylinder.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,513
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,513
Originally Posted by Hotrod Lincoln
Millions of stovebolt engines have run for decades with .060" and .080" overbores.

Mine's one of them (.080"). I will confess that before the rings seated it ran hot enough to make me nervous but settled down after break in.









1952 1300 Canadian 1/2 ton restomod
You Tube
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13
Just following up on this topic. I was talking to the machinist that is boring my 235. It is currently at .030 over and now he doesn't think that it will clean up at .040 over so it would have to go up to .060. Has anyone noticed a power loss due to boring it that much? Would I get more power out of it by putting sleeves in it? I plan on running a cam from Patrick's in it with dual exhaust, 2 carbs, and HEI ignition.


1954 Chevy 3100
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,652
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,652
You will be fine at 60. I would even go .080 if need be but not more then that. But at .060 you can find pistons and rings so good to go.


Mike
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,795
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,795
You will actually gain a little power at 60 over, due to slightly more displacement and more compression pressure, but it would take a skilled dyno operator and a fair amount of luck to actually measure it. Be sure your cooling system is up to dissipating the extra heat load the thinner cylinder walls will create. Installing a new water pump and a new or rebuilt radiator would be a really good idea.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 13
Thanks I feel a little more comfortable going with 60 now If it needs it.


1954 Chevy 3100

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0