The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
5 members (Hanks custodian, 2-Ton, Robert Crandall, Gdads51, 1 invisible), 91 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,169
Posts1,057,038
Members48,458
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 47
M
'Bolter
'Bolter
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 47
Howdy all.

Working on the subject engine / exhaust combo in my 59 Burb. I want to go rams head exhaust manifolds. I just picked up a very inexpensive set of manifolds (3747038 and 3749965) that I believe are 1.9 inch. I'm not a high performance speedster. However, are these 1.9ers going to restrict my capabilities to a major degree?? Appreciate your input.

Thanks! Maddog

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,868
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,868
Unless you're planning to run some outrageous RPM, I doubt if you'll notice any problems at all. I've run the small-pipe ram's horns on 350's at 6K+ RPM on the dyno, and they could have handled more speed easily. The big ones (2 1/2" pipes) were used on the 300 HP 327's and some of the high performance 350's, and it was difficult to tell the difference in performance between them and most of the headers we ran during dyno testing.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,624
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,624
My buddy runs them on a somewhat hi-performance 350 and hasn't complained about anything except the "JetHot" coating not holding up.


Six volt guy living in a twelve volt world
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,832
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,832
I have also spent a lot of dyno time with sbc and had the same results Jerry mentioned. Dynos had mass air flow sensors for years before cars and something I've noticed is larger exhaust kills some low end torque. Horsepower is not really affected till high rpm range. I think the loss of some exhaust scavaging with the large manifold is the reason since the maf sensor shows a drop compared to the smaller manifold. All the readings are so small that they are insignificant on a street engine.















































































































































































Evan

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0