Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,051 Posts1,055,729 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 201 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 201 | Anyone running a Muncie M20, M21, M22 in their AD trucks? If so what shifter linkage are you using and where does it put your shifter? | | | | | Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 319 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 319 | Not a Muncie, but I've got a Saginaw 4-speed (from a '74 Nova) in my '65. I made a plate to put the shifter as far forward as possible, and shortened the shift rods. It's a little tricky getting into 1st when it's cold, but the shifter isn't under the seat any more.
cm If you can't fix it with a hammer and screwdriver, you need a bigger hammer.1965 Chevy C10 | | | | | Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 1,262 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 1,262 | Not an AD... I had a M-21 Muncie in my '65 C10. I used a Hurst shifter designed for a '57 Chevy passenger car to clear the stock bench seat.
In my '65, the set-up did not allow the shifter to clear the stock bench seat. It would have worked though with a modified bench seat that had a shifter cut-out.
In my build thread below there are a bunch of photo's of how I modified the floor and of the trans and shifter arrangement.
IMHO, the Muncies are old school cool, but they aren't really as good of a choice as an overdrive transmission would be. In my truck with 33" dia. tires and a 3.37 rear gear I had to slip the clutch a bit to get it going, and that's when it was empty. A higher ratio rear gear would have helped that, but would have raised the highway rpm too. That's why an overdrive transmission would be better. Great around town performance & great highway RPM's too. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2013 Posts: 52 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2013 Posts: 52 | Just saw this thread...anyone who still want to use a stick these days usually gets my attention. I strongly considered a Muncie as I had several M22s in cars (vettes, etc) in past years. To deal with the bench seat. Hurst does have a special stick that jogs forward a couple inches before going vertical. They have a recommended linkage for this application, too. As I didn't own a Muncie at the time of my build or have a special deal somewhere, I went with a Tremec 5 spd. I looked at Muncies in a wide variety of prices and promises. I seriously considered an S10 5 spd, but since I wasn't running a 6, I passed on that. It was extra $$, but not more than the top prices I saw on Muncies. I finished my truck in August and now have almost 1k miles on it. I love the Tremec - positive shifting, perfect location for the shifter, the overdrive gear etc. My 49 AD
Last edited by Hilltown; 09/10/2015 6:50 PM.
| | | | | Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 37 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 37 | Sorry to drag out an old thread but my problem is along the same thing. I am putting a m-20 muncie behind my 235 motor. Truck is a 47 1/2 ton AD. My question after doing some searching is do I need a transmission crosmember? I had plains to add one but after reading some search threads some say it is not needed. Or will not allow enough flexibility in the drive line, causing transmission problems. I was thinking it wouldn't hurt to have one. Not that the m-20 can't take all that massive power of the 235 but it's aluminum case could use support. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | There was a rear-of-transmission cross-member through 1953 (for all transmissions).
The rear-engine-mount cross-member changed in 1954. Its "stronger" design allowed the elimination of the rear-of-transmission cross-member on all drive-trains, except for the very heavy Hydra-Matic transmission.
What is the weight of the M-20 transmission? Maybe someone knows the weight of the 1947 3-speed transmission? | | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 6,214 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 6,214 | All of my BIG truck transmissions just hang on the bell housing. The fire engine has a New Process 5-speed that I think weighs about 130 pounds. Mike B  | | | | | Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,215 Moderator | | Moderator Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,215 | I don't have a Muncie in my panel but I do in my 454 Beaumont. The tranny weighs about 75-80 pounds, about half of what the SM420 weighs. | | | | | Joined: Jul 2015 Posts: 10 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Jul 2015 Posts: 10 | Your correct in questioning the position of the shifter and the bench seat. I have a 50AD 350 SBC with a Saginaw (only difference in the shifters is the reverse rod) and ordered a custom Hurst shifter from "Patricks" who makes a custom shifter mount that bolts on to the gearbox and not the tail shaft. It moves the shifter forward to the proper position. He also has the perfect fit floor pan and boot to fit the set up. Its about $350. http://www.patricksantiquecars.com/chevy-gmc-auto-parts.html | | | | | Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 899 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 899 | I have 383 SBC, 485 HP. in my 55 210 with a wide ratio Muncie hanging off the back of the bell housing with no rear trans mount. I beat the hell out of it, and have had no problems.
Brian 1955.2 3100 Truck The older I get the more dangerous I am!!!!! | | |
| |