Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,013 Posts1,055,312 Members48,419 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: May 2004 Posts: 10 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: May 2004 Posts: 10 | I recently bought a great used bumper for the front of my 1950 half ton. It's scratched but solid and will look great until the day comes that I can paint and rechrome. Anyway, the bumper fits the front brackets just fine and matches what's left of the existing font bumper perfectly. Therefore, I know it is correct. However, when I compare it to my rear bumper, I find that the rear bumper is shorter and doesn't have as much curvature. I had always thought the front and rear bumper were the same part. I had assumed the the rear bumper was original since it was a one owner truck and everything else on the truck is original. Well, the rear bumper HAS had some modifications done to it at some point in its history. There is a homemade trailer hitch welded to the frame and to the top of the bumper. So it has had some tinkering but it still doesn't explain the shorter size. Is it possible that this rear bumper came off another vehicle with a similar bumper style. The bolt pattern matches and at a quick glance, you would think it was a correct bumper. Only after comparing it to my new bumper, did I notice the discrpency. Sorry for the long explaination but would appreciate any insight. | | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 1,419 ODSS President | | ODSS President Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 1,419 | The shorter rear bumper IS the correct one, you are lucky. These were an option on some years of trucks.
~ Cosmo 1949 Chevy Half Ton Rocinante, like Don Quixote, he is awkward, past his prime, and engaged in a task beyond his capacities. "...my good horse Rocinante, mine eternal and inseparable companion in all my journeys and courses." ...Don Quixote, Cervantes "If you come to a fork in the road, take it."...Yogi Berra "Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength." ...Eric Hoffer
| | | | | Joined: May 2004 Posts: 10 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: May 2004 Posts: 10 | cosmo, Thanks for the info. It makes me wonder why there was an option for a shorter bumper - Any idea? | | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | I think that you will find that the bumper itself was an option. I also think that the rear bumper was different than the fron one. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 454 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 454 | Yep, the front and rear bumpers were different, with different part numbers (Front - 3700438, Rear - 3700469). As you noted, the rear bumper is "flatter" with less curvature than the front. Can't recall if the rear was a option on all models of trucks. I'll look at my RPO list when I get home tonight and check. By the way, if you don't own one yourself, here's an online copy of the 1929-1954 Master Parts Catalog . Great reference.
Jeff Nelson
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." - Benjamin Franklin "Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest." - Mark Twain
| | | | | Joined: May 2004 Posts: 10 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: May 2004 Posts: 10 | I guess my confusion came from reading somewhere that the bumpers were the same. Thanks for the input on this topic and I'm excited to find out what I did. I do however have to do some cutting and grinding to get rid of the homemade hitch! | | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 428 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 428 | A rear bumper was standard on 47-50 models. Became optional on 51's and was deleted entirely sometime during the 51 year. Reappeared in 53 as an option. | | | | | Joined: May 2003 Posts: 183 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: May 2003 Posts: 183 | Well, that explains why the rear bumper on my 52 3100 looks like it was homemade. That was the year you couldn't even get one as an option. Thanks for the info.
My dad always told me, "Don't force it, get a bigger hammer".
| | |
| |