The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
9 - 11 Memorials

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (sawdust54, G508, Peggy M, Uncles51), 86 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,028
Posts1,055,414
Members48,422
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1082640 01/31/2015 3:12 AM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3
D
New Guy
New Guy
D Offline
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3
I have a 1960 235 truck engine. Replacing rings on one piston. Manual for the 1960 series states "Compression rings in all truck engines are the deep section twist type. This type of compression ring takes its name from its installed position which is cocked or twisted. It assumes and maintains this position for life because the upper edge of its diameter is chamfered." In the specs section the manual states "Upper compression ring: Thickwall Inside bevel, Lower compression ring: Thickwall taper faced scraper". When checking the rings that were on the piston i see both compression rings have the inside chamfer (as alluded to in the manual). My question centers around my replacement ring set, the top compression ring has no chamfer, the bottom compression rings do. Is this going to make any difference? Since i have a complete ring set and only am replacing them on one piston i could use a bottom ring also for the top in order to obtain a top chamfered ring as well if its important? Any advice. My ring set is supposedly for a 1960 era 235 (Enginetech part # R35646) but i believe 1953 and earlier 235 rings are different, perhaps i have a pre 1953 set??? any advice?

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 135
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 135
If the top ring on your new set has no markings or no bevel on either side of the ring, you can install it either way. If the second ring has a bevel, it should have a marking (sometimes referred to as a pip mark) denoting which side of the ring faces up. I would not substitute a beveled ring for the top ring with no bevel.



Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3
D
New Guy
New Guy
D Offline
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3
thank you for the response.


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0