The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
7 members (greenie-reddy, Deegs53, Cosmo, Otto Skorzeny, TooMany2count, DennisM, 1 invisible), 540 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,781
Posts1,039,297
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1072450 12/09/2014 4:03 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 12
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 12
It seems a lot of people change the rear axle on their trucks. From what I understand this is because it’s a torque tube, not a U joint axle. I have a 52 3600 truck with a U joint axle. Is this the factory rear end and is there any reason I couldn’t or shouldn’t use it? I would like to change the gear ratio but would keep the drum brakes.

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 182
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 182
Hello Neighbor,

In 1952, only the 3100 used the torque tube rear axle. The 3600 uses the Eaton HO52 axle, which was used from 1946 until sometime in the 70s. 4.10 gears are available used, but are hard to find.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,066
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,066
It's the factory rear end. That era 3/4 & 1 ton has a partial torque tube from the trans to a cross member and a flange that connected to an open drive line type rear end. There is an optional rear end available which is from a 67-72 truck with an auto trans. It has a 4:10 ratio. They are getting difficult to find however. There are numerous posts about this subject on this site.
Fred


1956 3100 Pickup/Red/350/3sp OD/PS/Disc Brakes
1957 Bel Air Sport Coupe/Red/355/TH350/PS/Disc Brakes
2017 Silverado LT Single Cab SB/Black/5.3/6 Speed Trans
1947 Willys CJ2A w/F-Head engine
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 96
5
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
5 Offline
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 96
the 3600 is a different animal when it comes to the brakes and rear end also has a longer box and running boards.
some parts are the same.
most who want a taller geared differential end up going to the junk yard with a tape measure and finding something that will fit
then you have to weld new spring perches and shock mounts

do your research before you start doing stuff with a 3600 some parts are available some aren't

evaluate what you have and then decide what to do based on the condition and what parts you need

Last edited by 513600; 12/09/2014 9:45 PM.
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 12
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 12
If I can't change the rear end gears, can I make it up in the transmission. I'm thinking of lower gears ratios in the transmission, like 2.85,1.85,1.31.1.0,.77. My goal is to be able to drive my truck at least 75-80 mph, with some acceleration. I want to keep up with traffic.

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,440
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,440
The OD tranny is the way to go but I think you are expecting too much speed out of a 216. My 248 tops out around 75 on flat ground with no wind. I'd recommend a disc brake upgrade with the higher speeds.


"It's just a phase. He'll grow out of it." Mama, 1964

1956 Chevy 1/2-ton 3100
1953 Chevy 6100 "The Yard dog"
1954 GMC Suburban Now with a new proud owner.
Joined: Nov 1995
Posts: 5,470
Bond Villain
Bond Villain
Joined: Nov 1995
Posts: 5,470
Concur with Cletis. I did the 4:10 3rd member upgrade to my 3800 (I have a 235 engine). Top speed I have been able to attain is 72 (going downhill) and 69 on level ground. It runs out of horsepower before it runs out of gears. It will cruise comfortably at 65 MPH now. BUT ... Cletis is also right about the brakes. I keep doubly aware of what's going on at that speed and hope like crazy I do not need to panic brake.

Also, next up is a front axle rebuild (king pins, ball ends, etc). 72 MPH is a little tense wink

Going to taller gears in either the rear axle or the transmission will tax your 216 or 235 considerably. You will not have a lot of acceleration.

John



~ John

"We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are"

1948 International Farmall Super A
1949 Chevrolet 3804
In the Legacy Gallery | In the Gallery Forum
1973 IH 1310 Dump
2001 International/AmTran RE3000 "Skoolie"
2014 Ford E-350 4x4 (Quigley)
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
Matt, if I were in your shoes, I would go with a T-5 transmission with the .70~ overdrive gear, and keep the stock rear end gears. The T-5 with the extra shifts will keep the engine in its optimum power band more often than a factory 4 speed which you start in 2nd gear (1st is granny gear for pulling stumps).
The stock rear end gears, even with the .70~ overdrive, will keep you from going faster than the stock brakes can stop you, while allowing you to keep up with highway traffic (excluding Mr Milliman, of course).
Carl


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 46
W
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
W Offline
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 46
I put myself in a position to find out top end on 59 gmc,235 3 on the tree,390 or 410 gears with 7:00 16 tires.it did about 80 mph,but coming off a hill i heard a loud pop and motor wasnt running well.that move coused me to find a piston without a hole in it and instal.maybe was askin for to much,hmmm

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 362
L
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
L Offline
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 362
Wots50, not meaning to get off topic, but did you change the rear in your truck. I know the GMC came with a 270 and 3.07 gearing from factory. My 58 was one of those and the 235 just wasn't up to the task with that rear gear, a small block resides there now. It'll cruise 65/70 once you get it moving, 1st is a little tall in my opinion.

Matt, the 235 is a great engine, if that's what you have in your truck, but with a few exceptions just isn't up to those speeds regularly. They were designed for 50's era roads and just not up to todays speeds. I'd pull it and update the drive line with the speeds you're wanting putting the original drive line aside in case the next owner wants to put it back. That's just my thoughts and it's your truck. Larry

Last edited by LarryW; 12/10/2014 1:37 PM.

58 gmc 100 with 350 sbc
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 12
M
New Guy
New Guy
M Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 12
Sorry, I should have said this in my earlier post. I am changing the engine to a 1964 small block 327.

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 96
5
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
5 Offline
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 96
Ok the challenge with a rear end swap is finding one that is narrow enough to fit.
nothing is going to be a simple direct bolt in.

again tape measure and a trip to the junk yard
find a 3.55 or a 3.73 ratio.

or find a T5 better yet do both

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 319
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 319
The 327, with an overdrive transmission, will give you what you want.

cm


If you can't fix it with a hammer and screwdriver, you need a bigger hammer.
1965 Chevy C10

Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.182s Queries: 14 (0.142s) Memory: 0.6529 MB (Peak: 0.7519 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 21:03:46 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS