| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
3 members (Peggy M, Mike B, 1 invisible),
77
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,026 Posts1,055,409 Members48,422 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,393 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,393 | It's been my experience that later(1955 and up) 235 and 261 clutch forks have different angle bends in them where they exit the bell housing. Laying one fork over another will show this. I've never seen any differences with any 216 clutch forks though.
I think the angle difference is in relation to the height of the TO bearing.
Drew
| | |
|
|
| |
