| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (1 invisible),
46
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,043 Posts1,055,610 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | 
#66922 10/08/2006 3:18 AM | Joined: Jan 1970 Posts: 365 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 1970 Posts: 365 | Does anyone know how much initial advance setting the timing to the ball on the flywheel yields?
When I got my 261 running I was very careful to set the timing exactly 'on the ball'. I also went to great pains to tighten the distributor down exactly in the center of the 'octane scale'.
My 51 Chevy 1/2 ton with 89mm (.70) overdrive and 3.50 rear gears gets about 14 mpg on the highway. I have about 1000 miles on a complete overhaul (.030 overbore, split exhaust, single Carter YF, 848 head).
Today just for giggles I advanced the timing to the last of the marks on the advance side of the scale. It seems like the throttle is more responsive and I don't have to push the gas pedal as far to maintain road speed. I can't get this engine to ping so I don't feel the timing is too far advanced. I will be getting a vaccuum gauge on the engine (as soon as I find it) to verify the timing settings.
The flywheel I am using came from a 235 truck engine if that makes a difference. | | |
|
|
| |
