| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
8 members (Bill Hanlon, 52Carl, Danielbolt, Hotrod Lincoln, NJC, Stovebolt48, Gdads51, 1 invisible),
46
guests, and
3
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,180 Posts1,057,163 Members48,464 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 34 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Mar 2007 Posts: 34 | Thanks Longbox, that is so simple that I feel stupid for not thinking of it. I added the measurements up, there is only 1" difference. The 1966 assembly is 1" longer. I don't see why that couldn't be accounted for by turning the tie rods in a little more into the adjusting sleeves.
Just to be absolutely sure, I asked my friend to get me a stud to stud measurement of one of his tie rod assemblies on his 1963 C-10. I still have the original tie rod assemblies from my 1966 C-10 assembled. I will compare lengths.
Seth K. Pyle | | |
|
|
| |
