| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
1 members (Russ_B_10),
91
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,050 Posts1,055,643 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | Correct and original are really two different things. It could still have the original motor but if the truck has seen many miles its most likely been rebuilt or replaced.
If its been rebuilt it is still original. If its been replaced it may still be correct, but it isn't original.
Now if you will accept my definitions at face value, and not all do, what do you really have? There is no registry that lists what motor came in what truck and no way beyond coincidence of showing the motor belongs in the truck. There can be many ways to show it didn't start life there.
I tend to evaluate a little differently. If its going to require a lot of work to make it look original I don't care how original it really is, I go whatever direction my pocket book and whims take me. If its likely a clean and easy return to original I'm like to consider that route, knowing its not what I want but could be easy to turn for more project money.
I've never completed a restoration, but is because I rarely buy stuff I don't see as hot rod material.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
| |
| |