| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,087 Posts1,056,119 Members48,435 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 2,766 Carburetion specialist | | Carburetion specialist Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 2,766 | With all respect to those who have posted that have had success with the clones:
Comparing something new to something needing work will normally mean the something new works better.
However, comparing a clone on a SBC to a properly functioning Q-Jet would result in:
(A) fuel economy of about 10~15 percent less for the clone (B) low RPM torque of maybe 5~10 percent less for the clone (C) more difficult hot starts for the clone (D) no improvement in high end HP for the clone
Remember that the Q-Jet is a 750 CFM carburetor (150P/variable 600S). The 600 clone is 250P/variable 375S (no, this is NOT a misprint!).
Running the clone through a square-bore -> spreadbore adapter (not changing the intake) reduces the clone to a 525 CFM (150P/variable 375S).
However, the clone is convenient, if you don't object to the loss in performance.
Jon.
Good carburetion is fuelish hot airThe most expensive carburetor is the wrong one you attempt to modify. If you truly believe "one size fits all," try walking a mile in your spouse's shoes!The Carburetor Shop | | |
| |
| |