| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
10 members (Gdads51, klhansen, Bill Hanlon, cmayna, tclederman, qside, Hanks custodian, mick53, 1955 1 Series, ShopRag),
115
guests, and
3
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,268 Posts1,058,384 Members48,485 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#42900 03/17/2004 9:41 PM | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 31 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 31 | Actually Murdoc, a carb was designed in the thirties to net 68 mpg. I DO remember reading about that in my engineering text books. The big three or the Govt bought the guy's design and shelved it or blew it up.
Actually, what your pop was describing is similar to steam turbines using downline inefficiencies to improve stuff at the intake, so it's probably not a hoax. Guy's just applying steam plant methods to gas driven cars.
From a volume manufacturer's view point, this would be absurdly too expensive! There are sometimes cost benefits to making cars inefficient: because making them too efficient costs too darn much and would not sell.
Ain't it cool?
Cheers from Chris in NC with the stalling MOPAR
Spito, spitero, huchtooey splateus! 1958 GMC Series 100 stepside 1954 Chevrolet Bel Air 4-DR sedan 1966 Chrysler Newport 2-DR hardtop
| | |
| |
| |