| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,202 Posts1,057,284 Members48,467 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | If you are not going to load the truck I think the Camaro stuff will handle the weight. The frame is heavier than the smaller trucks, but the total empty weight is not that much more than the late 70's Camaros.
The key issue in my mind is the brakes. The Camaro overloaded with everything you could stuff in it would never gross near the 8800 the 1-ton is rated to carry. If you were ever to load the Camaro suspended truck like a 1-ton truck you would not have the brakes you would really want for stopping it.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | |
|
|
| |
