| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (baldeagle, Gray_Ghost, Peggy M, Wickedbass, Charles in CA, cmayna, pkr),
62
guests, and
8
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,018 Posts1,055,342 Members48,419 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | 
#18866 03/05/2002 1:05 AM | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 146 Member | | Member Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 146 | Tony,
Don't think so. Not with this increase, because the big end of the 292 rods are smaller than the 261 and I'm not going to weld to make more stroke than I could achieve just offset grinding.
The idea of getting power without revving too high is quite clever in this case. I do not plan spinning it more than 5.000 rpm anyway(this will not be a drag racing engine and this rpm may be sustained a short while, but not all day long, of course). Would even consider sacrificing some numbers than over revving and breaking. Also plan using a shorter duration higher lift cam.
Alexandre Garcia
| | |
|
|
| |
